Na Kun, Qiu Miaohan, Wei Ningxin, Li Jiayin, Yan Chenghui, Li Jing, Li Yi, Han Yaling
Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
College of Life Sciences and Biopharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Sep 8;10:1201091. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1201091. eCollection 2023.
In current clinical practice, controversy remains regarding the clinical benefits of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients facing high risks of both ischemia and bleeding ("bi-risk") following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of identifying a group of bi-risk ACS patients after PCI using the OPT-BIRISK criteria, emphasizing extended DAPT treatment safety and efficacy beyond 12 months in these bi-risk ACS after PCI in real-world conditions.
This analysis compared extended DAPT and single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) at 12-24 months in ACS patients undergoing PCI complicated with both ischemic and bleeding risk as defined by OPT-BIRISK criteria without premature DAPT discontinuation before 9 months or major clinical adverse events within 12 months. This was a analysis of the Optimal antiPlatelet Antiplatelet Therapy for Chinese Patients with Coronary Artery Disease (OPT-CAD) study. The main research outcome was the incidence of ischemic events within 12-24 months, which was determined as a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiac death events. Through propensity score matching (PSM), groups were balanced. For the external validation of the OPT-BIRISK criteria to identify a bi-risk ACS patient, ischemic events, BARC 2, 3, 5 bleeding events, and BARC 3, 5 bleeding events at 5 years were analyzed.
The total number of ACS patients analyzed in this analysis was 7,049, of whom 4,146 (58.8%) were bi-risk patients and 2,903 (41.2%) were not. The frequency of ischemic events was significantly different between the two groups at 5 years (11.70% vs. 5.55%, < 0.001), and the incidence of BARC 2,3,5 bleeding was significantly higher in the bi-risk group (6.90% vs. 4.03%, < 0.001) than in the non-bi-risk group. Among the bi-risk patients without any clinical adverse events within 12 months that underwent extended DAPT treatment ( = 2,374, 75.7%) exhibited a lower risk of stroke at 12-24 months (1.10% vs. 2.10%, = 0.036) relative to those that underwent SAPT ( = 763, 24.3%), while bleeding risk did not differ significantly between these groups. PSM cohort analysis results were consistent with those of overall group analyses.
In conclusion, the findings showed that using the OPT-BIRISK criteria could help physicians identify ACS patients at a high risk of developing recurrent ischemia and bleeding episodes after PCI. Compared to antiplatelet monotherapy, a strategy of extended DAPT may offer potential benefits in lowering the risk of stroke without carrying a disproportionately high risk of serious bleeding problems among these patients who were event-free after a year of DAPT.
在当前临床实践中,对于接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后同时面临缺血和出血高风险(“双风险”)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者,延长双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的临床益处仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨使用OPT-BIRISK标准识别一组PCI术后双风险ACS患者的可行性,强调在现实世界条件下,这些双风险PCI术后ACS患者超过12个月的延长DAPT治疗的安全性和有效性。
本分析比较了在OPT-BIRISK标准定义的同时存在缺血和出血风险且在9个月前未提前停用DAPT或12个月内无重大临床不良事件的PCI术后ACS患者中,12至24个月时延长DAPT与单一抗血小板治疗(SAPT)的情况。这是对中国冠状动脉疾病患者最佳抗血小板治疗(OPT-CAD)研究的分析。主要研究结局是12至24个月内缺血事件的发生率,其被确定为中风、心肌梗死和心源性死亡事件的复合情况。通过倾向评分匹配(PSM)使各组达到平衡。为了对OPT-BIRISK标准识别双风险ACS患者进行外部验证,分析了5年时的缺血事件、BARC 2、3、5级出血事件以及BARC 3、5级出血事件。
本分析中纳入的ACS患者总数为7049例,其中4146例(58.8%)为双风险患者,2903例(41.2%)为非双风险患者。两组在5年时缺血事件的发生率有显著差异(11.70%对5.55%,P<0.001),双风险组BARC 2、3、5级出血的发生率显著高于非双风险组(6.90%对4.03%,P<0.001)。在12个月内无任何临床不良事件且接受延长DAPT治疗的双风险患者中(n = 2374,75.7%),与接受SAPT的患者(n = 763,24.3%)相比,12至24个月时中风风险较低(1.10%对2.10%,P = 0.036),而这些组之间出血风险无显著差异。PSM队列分析结果与总体组分析结果一致。
总之,研究结果表明,使用OPT-BIRISK标准可帮助医生识别PCI术后有复发缺血和出血事件高风险的ACS患者。与抗血小板单药治疗相比,延长DAPT策略可能在降低中风风险方面具有潜在益处,且在这些接受一年DAPT后无事件的患者中不会带来过高的严重出血问题风险。