Schudde Lauren
The University of Texas at Austin.
Rev Res Educ. 2018 Mar;42(1):72-92. doi: 10.3102/0091732x18759040. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
To date, the theory of intersectionality has largely guided qualitative efforts in social science and education research. Translating the construct to new methodological approaches is inherently complex and challenging, but offers the possibility of breaking down silos that keep education researchers with similar interests-but different methodological approaches-from sharing knowledge. Quantitative approaches that emphasize the varied impacts of individual identities on educational outcomes move beyond singular dimensions capturing individual characteristics, drawing a parallel to intersectionality. Scholars interested in heterogeneous effects recognize the shortcomings of focusing on the effect of a single social identity. This integrative review explores techniques used in quantitative research to examine heterogeneous effects across individual background, drawing on methodological literature from the social sciences and education. I examine the goals and challenges of the quantitative techniques and explore how they relate to intersectionality. I conclude by discussing what education researchers can learn from other applied fields that are working to develop a crosswalk across the two disparate, but interconnected, literatures.
迄今为止,交叉性理论在很大程度上指导了社会科学和教育研究中的定性研究工作。将这一概念转化为新的方法论方法本质上是复杂且具有挑战性的,但它提供了打破壁垒的可能性,这些壁垒使得有着相似兴趣但方法论方法不同的教育研究者无法分享知识。强调个体身份对教育成果的多样影响的定量方法超越了捕捉个体特征的单一维度,与交叉性形成了类比。对异质性影响感兴趣的学者认识到专注于单一社会身份影响的缺点。本整合性综述借鉴社会科学和教育领域的方法论文献,探讨定量研究中用于检验个体背景异质性影响的技术。我审视了定量技术的目标和挑战,并探讨它们与交叉性的关系。最后,我将讨论教育研究者可以从其他致力于在这两个不同但相互关联的文献之间建立桥梁的应用领域中学到什么。