J Couns Psychol. 2023 Oct;70(5):604. doi: 10.1037/cou0000701.
Reports the retraction of "Is training effective? A study of counseling psychology doctoral trainees in a psychodynamic/interpersonal training clinic" by Clara E. Hill, Ellen Baumann, Naama Shafran, Shudarshana Gupta, Ashley Morrison, Andrés E. Pérez Rojas, Patricia T. Spangler, Shauna Griffin, Laura Pappa and Charles J. Gelso (, 2015[Apr], Vol 62[2], 184-201). The following article is being retracted (https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000053). This retraction is at the request of coauthors Hill and Gelso after the results of an investigation by the University of Maryland Institutional Review Board (IRB). The IRB found that the study included data from between one and four therapy clients of the Maryland Psychotherapy Clinic and Research Laboratory (MPCRL) who either had not been asked to provide consent or had withdrawn consent for their data to be included in the research. Baumann, Shafran, Gupta, Morrison, Rojas, Spangler, Griffin and Pappa were not responsible for obtaining and verifying participant consent but agreed to the retraction of this article (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2015-02322-001.) We investigated changes over 12 to 42 months in 23 predoctoral trainees during their externship training in a psychodynamic/interpersonal psychotherapy clinic. Over time, trainees increased in client-rated working alliance and real relationship, therapist-rated working alliance, client-rated interpersonal functioning, ability to use helping skills (e.g., challenges, immediacy), higher-order functioning (e.g., conceptualization ability, countertransference management), feelings about themselves as therapists (e.g., more authentic, more self-aware), and understanding about being a therapist (e.g., theoretical orientation, curiosity about client dynamics). In contrast, trainees did not change in engaging clients (return after intake or for at least 8 sessions), judge-rated psychodynamic techniques in third and ninth sessions across clients (although trainees used more cognitive-behavioral techniques over time in third but not ninth sessions), or changes in client-rated symptomatology. Trainees primarily attributed changes to graduate training, individual and group supervision, research participation, and working with clients. Implications for training and research are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
报告撤回 Clara E. Hill、Ellen Baumann、Naama Shafran、Shudarshana Gupta、Ashley Morrison、Andrés E. Pérez Rojas、Patricia T. Spangler、Shauna Griffin、Laura Pappa 和 Charles J. Gelso 的文章“培训有效吗？心理动力学/人际培训诊所中咨询心理学博士生的研究”（2015 年 4 月，第 62 卷，第 184-201 页）。应合著者 Hill 和 Gelso 的要求，马里兰大学机构审查委员会（IRB）的一项调查结果，撤回了这篇文章（https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000053）。Baumann、Shafran、Gupta、Morrison、Rojas、Spangler、Griffin 和 Pappa 并未负责获取和核实参与者的同意，但同意撤回这篇文章（原始文章的摘要如下）。我们调查了 23 名博士生在心理动力学/人际心理治疗诊所的实习培训中，在 12 至 42 个月期间的变化。随着时间的推移，受训者在客户评定的工作联盟和真实关系、治疗师评定的工作联盟、客户评定的人际功能、使用帮助技能的能力（例如，挑战，即时性）、更高层次的功能（例如，概念化能力，反移情管理）、作为治疗师的自我感觉（例如，更真实，更自我意识）和对治疗师的理解（例如，理论取向，对客户动态的好奇心）方面有所提高。相比之下，受训者在吸引客户方面并没有变化（在入职后或至少 8 次就诊后返回），在第 3 次和第 9 次就诊中，对客户的判断性心理动力学技术没有变化（尽管随着时间的推移，受训者在第 3 次但不在第 9 次就诊中使用了更多的认知行为技术），或者客户评定的症状学变化。受训者主要将变化归因于研究生培训、个人和小组监督、研究参与以及与客户合作。讨论了对培训和研究的影响。（PsycInfo 数据库记录（c）2023 APA，保留所有权利）。
