Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
J Clin Densitom. 2023 Oct-Dec;26(4):101430. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101430. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
Lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS) used in conjunction with FRAX® improves 10-year fracture prediction. The derived FRAX risk adjustment is based upon TBS measured from L1-L4, designated TBS-FRAX. In prior studies, TBS measurements that include L1 and exclude L4 give better fracture stratification than L1-L4. We compared risk stratification from TBS-adjusted FRAX using TBS derived from different combinations of upper lumbar vertebral levels renormalized for level-specific differences in individuals from the Manitoba Bone Density Program aged >40 years with baseline assessment of TBS and FRAX. TBS measurements for L1-L3, L1-L2 and L1 alone were calculated after renormalization for level-specific differences. Corresponding TBS-adjusted FRAX scores designated TBS-FRAX, TBS-FRAX and TBS-FRAX were compared with TBS-FRAX for fracture risk stratification. Incident major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) and hip fractures were assessed. The primary outcome was incremental change in area under the curve (ΔAUC). The study population included 71,209 individuals (mean age 64 years, 89.8% female). Before renormalization, mean TBS for L1-3, L1-L2 and L1 was significantly lower and TBS-adjusted FRAX significantly higher than from using TBS. These differences were largely eliminated when TBS was renormalized for level-specific differences. During mean follow-up of 8.7 years 6745 individuals sustained incident MOF and 2039 sustained incident hip fractures. Compared with TBS-FRAX, use of FRAX without TBS was associated with lower stratification (ΔAUC = -0.009, p < 0.001). There was progressive improvement in MOF stratification using TBSL-FRAX (ΔAUC = +0.001, p < 0.001), TBS-FRAX (ΔAUC = +0.004, p < 0.001) and TBS-FRAX (ΔAUC = +0.005, p < 0.001). TBS-FRAX was significantly better than all other combinations for MOF prediction (p < 0.001). Incremental improvement in AUC for hip fracture prediction showed a similar but smaller trend. In conclusion, this single large cohort study found that TBS-adjusted FRAX performance for fracture prediction was improved when limited to the upper lumbar vertebral levels and was best using L1 alone.
腰椎骨小梁骨密度评分(TBS)与 FRAX®联合使用可提高 10 年骨折预测能力。衍生的 FRAX 风险调整基于 L1-L4 测量的 TBS,称为 TBS-FRAX。在先前的研究中,包括 L1 并排除 L4 的 TBS 测量比 L1-L4 具有更好的骨折分层能力。我们比较了基于 TBS 调整的 FRAX 使用来自马尼托巴骨密度计划中年龄>40 岁的个体的不同上腰椎椎体水平的 TBS 测量值进行风险分层,这些个体的 TBS 测量值经过水平特异性差异重新归一化,并且在基线时评估了 TBS 和 FRAX。在对水平特异性差异进行重新归一化后,计算了 L1-L3、L1-L2 和 L1 单独的 TBS 测量值。指定为 TBS-FRAX、TBS-FRAX 和 TBS-FRAX 的相应 TBS 调整的 FRAX 评分与 TBS-FRAX 用于骨折风险分层进行了比较。评估了主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)和髋部骨折的发生率。主要结局是曲线下面积(AUC)的增量变化(ΔAUC)。研究人群包括 71,209 名个体(平均年龄 64 岁,89.8%为女性)。在重新归一化之前,L1-3、L1-L2 和 L1 的平均 TBS 明显较低,而 TBS 调整的 FRAX 明显较高。当 TBS 针对水平特异性差异进行重新归一化时,这些差异在很大程度上消除了。在平均 8.7 年的随访期间,有 6745 名患者发生了主要骨质疏松性骨折,2039 名患者发生了髋部骨折。与 TBS-FRAX 相比,不使用 TBS 的 FRAX 与分层能力降低相关(ΔAUC= -0.009,p<0.001)。使用 TBSL-FRAX(ΔAUC=+0.001,p<0.001)、TBS-FRAX(ΔAUC=+0.004,p<0.001)和 TBS-FRAX(ΔAUC=+0.005,p<0.001),MOF 分层能力得到了逐步改善。TBS-FRAX 对 MOF 预测的效果明显优于其他所有组合(p<0.001)。髋部骨折预测 AUC 的增量改善显示出相似但较小的趋势。总之,这项单一大队列研究发现,当限制在上腰椎椎体水平时,TBS 调整的 FRAX 对骨折预测的性能得到了改善,并且使用 L1 时效果最佳。