Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA ARS), Beltsville, MD, United States of America.
USDA ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Meat Safety and Quality, Clay Center, NE, United States of America.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 20;905:167189. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167189. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
Developing effective and sensitive detection methods for antimicrobial resistant Salmonella enterica from surface water is a goal of the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS). There are no specified methods for recovery of S. enterica in surface waters in the U.S. A multi-laboratory evaluation of four methods - bulk water enrichment (BW), vertical Modified Moore Swab (VMMS), modified Standard Method 9260.B2 (SM), and dead-end ultrafiltration (DEUF) - was undertaken to recover S. enterica from surface water. In Phase 1, one-liter volumes of water were collected from the same site on five different dates. Water was shipped and analyzed at four different laboratory locations (A, B, C, and D) for recovery of 1) inoculated fluorescent S. Typhimurium strain (ca. 30 CFU/L) and 2) Salmonella present in the water sampled. At each location, BW, VMMS, or SM recovery was performed on five separate 1 L water samples. Twenty 1 L water samples were subjected to each recovery method, and overall, sixty 1 L samples were assayed for Salmonella. Inoculated, fluorescent Salmonella Typhimurium and environmental Salmonella spp. were recovered from 65 % (39/60) and 45 % (27/60) of water samples, respectively. BW, VMMS, and SM recovered fluorescent S. Typhimurium from 60 %, 60 %, and 75 % of inoculated samples, respectively. Analysis by Chi-squared test determined laboratory location had a significant (p < 0.05) effect on fluorescent S. Typhimurium recovery compared to method or date of water collection. In Phase 2, recovery of inoculated fluorescent S. Typhimurium from 1 L samples by SM and DEUF was compared at laboratory locations B and D. SM and DEUF recovered fluorescent S. Typhimurium from 100 % (20/20) and 95 % (19/20) of inoculated water samples, respectively; laboratory location (p > 0.05) did not affect Salmonella recovery. Uniform laboratory methodology and training should be prioritized in conducting Salmonella recovery from surface water in laboratories.
开发针对食源性沙门氏菌的有效和敏感的检测方法是国家抗菌药物耐药性监测系统(NARMS)的目标之一。美国目前还没有针对地表水的沙门氏菌回收的具体方法。本研究对四种方法——批量水富集法(BW)、垂直改良摩尔拭子法(VMMS)、改良标准方法 9260.B2(SM)和死端超滤法(DEUF)——进行了多实验室评估,以从地表水回收沙门氏菌。在第 1 阶段,从五个不同日期的同一地点采集了 1 升水样。水样被运往四个不同的实验室(A、B、C 和 D)进行分析,以回收 1)接种荧光鼠伤寒沙门氏菌菌株(约 30 CFU/L)和 2)水样中存在的沙门氏菌。在每个地点,对五个单独的 1 升水样进行 BW、VMMS 或 SM 回收。对每种回收方法进行了 20 个 1 升水样的检测,总共对 60 个 1 升水样进行了沙门氏菌检测。接种荧光鼠伤寒沙门氏菌和环境沙门氏菌分别从 65%(39/60)和 45%(27/60)的水样中回收。BW、VMMS 和 SM 分别从 60%、60%和 75%的接种样本中回收了荧光鼠伤寒沙门氏菌。卡方检验分析表明,与水样采集日期或方法相比,实验室位置对荧光鼠伤寒沙门氏菌的回收有显著影响(p<0.05)。在第 2 阶段,在实验室 B 和 D 比较了 SM 和 DEUF 对 1 升接种荧光鼠伤寒沙门氏菌样品的回收效果。SM 和 DEUF 分别从 100%(20/20)和 95%(19/20)的接种水样中回收了荧光鼠伤寒沙门氏菌;实验室位置(p>0.05)未影响沙门氏菌的回收。在实验室从地表水回收沙门氏菌时,应优先采用统一的实验室方法和培训。