LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Université Paris Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Medical Oncology department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Present Address: Université Paris Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
J Thorac Oncol. 2024 Feb;19(2):297-313. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.09.1445. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
We report the primary analysis from JAVELIN Lung 100, a phase 3 trial comparing avelumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1]) versus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment for PD-L1-positive (+) advanced NSCLC.
Adults with PD-L1+ (≥1% of tumor cells; PD-L1 immunohistochemistry 73-10 pharmDx), EGFR and ALK wild-type, previously untreated, stage IV NSCLC were randomized to avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W), avelumab 10 mg/kg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks and Q2W thereafter, or platinum-based doublet chemotherapy every 3 weeks. Primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) per independent review committee. The primary analysis population was patients with high-expression PD-L1+ tumors (≥80% of tumor cells).
A total of 1214 patients were randomized to avelumab Q2W (n = 366), avelumab QW (n = 322), or chemotherapy (n = 526). In the primary analysis population, hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and PFS with avelumab Q2W (n = 151) versus chemotherapy (n = 216) were 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-1.09; one-sided p = 0.1032; median OS, 20.1 versus 14.9 mo) and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.54-0.93; one-sided p = 0.0070; median PFS, 8.4 versus 5.6 mo), respectively. With avelumab QW (n = 130) versus chemotherapy (n = 129), HRs were 0.79 (95% CI: 0.59-1.07; one-sided p = 0.0630; median OS, 19.3 versus 15.3 mo) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.52-0.98; one-sided p = 0.0196; median PFS, 7.5 versus 5.6 mo), respectively. No new safety signals were observed.
Longer median OS and PFS were observed with avelumab versus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC, but differences in OS and PFS were not statistically significant, and the trial did not meet its primary objective.
gov Identifier: NCT02576574.
我们报告了 JAVELIN Lung 100 的主要分析结果,这是一项 3 期临床试验,比较了avelumab(抗程序性死亡配体 1 [PD-L1])与铂类双联化疗作为 PD-L1 阳性(+)晚期 NSCLC 的一线治疗。
未经治疗的 PD-L1+(肿瘤细胞的≥1%;PD-L1 免疫组化 73-10 pharmDx)、EGFR 和 ALK 野生型、先前未经治疗的 IV 期 NSCLC 成年患者被随机分配接受avelumab 10 mg/kg,每 2 周(Q2W),avelumab 10 mg/kg 每周一次(QW)治疗 12 周,然后 Q2W 或每 3 周接受铂类双联化疗。主要终点为独立审查委员会评估的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。主要分析人群为高表达 PD-L1+肿瘤患者(≥80%的肿瘤细胞)。
共 1214 例患者被随机分配至avelumab Q2W(n=366)、avelumab QW(n=322)或化疗(n=526)组。在主要分析人群中,avelumab Q2W(n=151)与化疗(n=216)相比,OS 和 PFS 的风险比(HR)分别为 0.85(95%置信区间[CI]:0.67-1.09;单侧 p=0.1032;中位 OS,20.1 与 14.9 个月)和 0.71(95% CI:0.54-0.93;单侧 p=0.0070;中位 PFS,8.4 与 5.6 个月)。avelumab QW(n=130)与化疗(n=129)相比,HR 分别为 0.79(95% CI:0.59-1.07;单侧 p=0.0630;中位 OS,19.3 与 15.3 个月)和 0.72(95% CI:0.52-0.98;单侧 p=0.0196;中位 PFS,7.5 与 5.6 个月)。未观察到新的安全性信号。
avelumab 与铂类双联化疗相比,晚期 NSCLC 的中位 OS 和 PFS 更长,但 OS 和 PFS 的差异无统计学意义,试验未达到主要终点。
gov 标识符:NCT02576574。