Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 25;13(1):16005. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43352-y.
To evaluate the differential associations of high-risk plaque characteristics (HRPC) with resting or hyperemic physiologic indexes (instantaneous wave-free ratio [iFR] or fractional flow reserve [FFR]), a total of 214 vessels from 127 patients with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and invasive physiologic assessment were investigated. HPRC were classified into quantitative (minimal luminal area < 4 mm or plaque burden ≥ 70%) and qualitative features (low attenuation plaque, positive remodeling, napkin ring sign, or spotty calcification). Vessels with FFR ≤ 0.80 or iFR ≤ 0.89 had significantly higher proportions of HRPC than those with FFR > 0.80 or iFR > 0.89, respectively. FFR was independently associated with both quantitative and qualitative HRPC, but iFR was only associated with quantitative HRPC. Both FFR and iFR were significantly associated with the presence of ≥ 3 HRPC, and FFR demonstrated higher discrimination ability than iFR (AUC 0.703 vs. 0.648, P = 0.045), which was predominantly driven by greater discriminating ability of FFR for quantitative HRPC (AUC 0.832 vs. 0.744, P = 0.005). In conclusion, both FFR and iFR were significantly associated with CCTA-derived HRPC. Compared with iFR, however, FFR was independently associated with the presence of qualitative HRPC and showed a higher predictive ability for the presence of ≥ 3 HRPC.
为了评估高危斑块特征(HRPC)与静息或充血性生理指标(瞬时无波比[iFR]或血流储备分数[FFR])的差异相关性,对 127 例稳定性心绞痛或急性冠状动脉综合征患者的 214 支血管进行了研究,这些患者接受了冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CCTA)和侵入性生理评估。HRPC 分为定量(最小管腔面积<4mm 或斑块负荷≥70%)和定性特征(低衰减斑块、正性重构、餐巾环征或点状钙化)。FFR≤0.80 或 iFR≤0.89 的血管与 FFR>0.80 或 iFR>0.89 的血管相比,具有 HRPC 的比例显著更高。FFR 与定量和定性 HRPC 均独立相关,但 iFR 仅与定量 HRPC 相关。FFR 和 iFR 均与存在≥3 个 HRPC 显著相关,FFR 显示出比 iFR 更高的判别能力(AUC 0.703 与 0.648,P=0.045),这主要是由于 FFR 对定量 HRPC 的判别能力更强(AUC 0.832 与 0.744,P=0.005)。总之,FFR 和 iFR 与 CCTA 衍生的 HRPC 显著相关。然而,与 iFR 相比,FFR 与定性 HRPC 的存在独立相关,并且对存在≥3 个 HRPC 的预测能力更高。