Suppr超能文献

饮忘川之水:将自愿选择纳入自愿遗忘研究。

Drinking the waters of Lethe: Bringing voluntary choice into the study of voluntary forgetting.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Hildesheim, Unversitaetsplatz 1, D-31141, Hildesheim, Germany.

Department of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2024 Feb;52(2):254-270. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01467-7. Epub 2023 Sep 25.

Abstract

The directed forgetting paradigm has long been used to test whether humans can voluntarily choose to forget learned information. However, to date, nearly all directed forgetting paradigms have involved a forced-choice paradigm, in which the participants are instructed about which learned information they should forget. While studies have repeatedly shown that this directed forgetting does lead to a decreased ability to later remember the information, it is still unclear whether these effects would be present if participants were allowed to, of their own accord, choose which information they wanted to forget. In two experiments here, we introduce a free-choice variety of the item method directed forgetting paradigm and show that directed forgetting effects are robust, both for instructed and voluntary forgetting. We discuss the implications of our findings for notions of voluntary forgetting and for the self-choice effect in memory.

摘要

定向遗忘范式长期以来一直被用于测试人类是否能够自愿选择忘记所学信息。然而,迄今为止,几乎所有的定向遗忘范式都涉及到一种强制选择范式,即参与者被指示应该忘记哪些所学信息。虽然研究一再表明,这种定向遗忘确实会导致后来回忆信息的能力下降,但如果允许参与者自行选择想要忘记的信息,这种效果是否会存在仍不清楚。在本文的两个实验中,我们引入了一种自由选择的项目方法定向遗忘范式,并表明定向遗忘效应是稳健的,无论是在指令性遗忘还是自愿性遗忘中都是如此。我们讨论了我们的发现对自愿遗忘概念和记忆中的自我选择效应的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3893/10896790/f9811cb0b53e/13421_2023_1467_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验