Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Department of Psychology, California State University, Bakersfield, CA, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Jun;27(3):529-535. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01723-w.
Despite the substantial evidence highlighting the role of selective rehearsal in item-method directed forgetting, recent work has suggested that forgetting may occur as a function of an active inhibitory mechanism that is more effortful than elaborative rehearsal processes. In the present work, we test this hypothesis by implementing a double-item presentation within the item-method directed forgetting paradigm. Participants studied two unrelated items at a time. Some words were followed by the same cue, and participants were instructed to remember or forget both items (pure condition). On other trials, participants were to remember one but forget the other word (mixed condition). Selective rehearsal and inhibition accounts make distinct predictions regarding memory performance in the double-item presentation. In Experiment 1, we compared recognition performance in the pure and mixed conditions, while in Experiment 2, we included a neutral baseline condition to further distinguish between the selective rehearsal and inhibition accounts. Contrary to the inhibition account but consistent with selective rehearsal, we found for both remember and forget items that recognition was greater in the mixed than in the pure condition. Recognition for forget items also did not differ from neutral items. We conclude that selective rehearsal, not inhibition, is responsible for item-method directed forgetting.
尽管有大量证据强调了选择性复述在项目方法定向遗忘中的作用,但最近的研究表明,遗忘可能是一种主动抑制机制的作用,这种机制比详尽复述过程更费力。在本研究中,我们通过在项目方法定向遗忘范式中实施双项目呈现来检验这一假设。参与者一次学习两个不相关的项目。有些单词后面跟着相同的提示,参与者被指示记住或忘记两个项目(纯条件)。在其他试验中,参与者被要求记住一个单词但忘记另一个单词(混合条件)。选择性复述和抑制解释对双项目呈现中的记忆表现做出了不同的预测。在实验 1 中,我们比较了纯条件和混合条件下的识别表现,而在实验 2 中,我们包括了一个中性基线条件,以进一步区分选择性复述和抑制解释。与抑制解释相反,但与选择性复述一致,我们发现,对于记住和忘记的项目,混合条件下的识别都高于纯条件。忘记项目的识别也与中性项目没有差异。我们的结论是,选择性复述而不是抑制是项目方法定向遗忘的原因。