• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕早期早产型先兆子痫的预测及阿司匹林预防:对自发性和医源性早产的影响。

First-trimester prediction of preterm pre-eclampsia and prophylaxis by aspirin: Effect on spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm birth.

作者信息

Nicolaides Kypros H, Syngelaki Argyro, Poon Liona C, Rolnik Daniel L, Tan Min Yi, Wright Alan, Wright David

机构信息

Fetal Medicine Research Institute, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

Institute of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2024 Mar;131(4):483-492. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17673. Epub 2023 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.17673
PMID:37749709
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report the predictive performance for preterm birth (PTB) of the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) triple test and National Institute for health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines used to screen for pre-eclampsia and examine the impact of aspirin in the prevention of PTB.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of data from the SPREE study and the ASPRE trial.

SETTING

Multicentre studies.

POPULATION

In SPREE, women with singleton pregnancies had screening for preterm pre-eclampsia at 11-13 weeks of gestation by the FMF method and NICE guidelines. There were 16 451 pregnancies that resulted in delivery at ≥24 weeks of gestation and these data were used to derive the predictive performance for PTB of the two methods of screening. The results from the ASPRE trial were used to examine the effect of aspirin in the prevention of PTB in the population from SPREE.

METHODS

Comparison of performance of FMF method and NICE guidelines for pre-eclampsia in the prediction of PTB and use of aspirin in prevention of PTB.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Spontaneous PTB (sPTB), iatrogenic PTB for pre-eclampsia (iPTB-PE) and iatrogenic PTB for reasons other than pre-eclampsia (iPTB-noPE).

RESULTS

Estimated incidence rates of sPTB, iPTB-PE and iPTB-noPE were 3.4%, 0.8% and 1.6%, respectively. The corresponding detection rates were 17%, 82% and 25% for the triple test and 12%, 39% and 19% for NICE guidelines, using the same overall screen positive rate of 10.2%. The estimated proportions prevented by aspirin were 14%, 65% and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Prediction of sPTB and iPTB-noPE by the triple test was poor and poorer by the NICE guidelines. Neither sPTB nor iPTB-noPE was reduced substantially by aspirin.

摘要

目的

报告胎儿医学基金会(FMF)三联检测法和用于子痫前期筛查的英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)指南对早产(PTB)的预测性能,并研究阿司匹林在预防PTB中的作用。

设计

对SPREE研究和ASPRE试验的数据进行二次分析。

设置

多中心研究。

研究对象

在SPREE研究中,单胎妊娠妇女在妊娠11 - 13周时采用FMF方法和NICE指南进行早产子痫前期筛查。共有16451例妊娠在妊娠≥24周时分娩,这些数据用于得出两种筛查方法对PTB的预测性能。ASPRE试验的结果用于研究阿司匹林在SPREE研究人群中预防PTB的效果。

方法

比较FMF方法和NICE指南对子痫前期的预测性能以及阿司匹林在预防PTB中的应用。

主要观察指标

自发性早产(sPTB)、子痫前期导致的医源性早产(iPTB - PE)以及子痫前期以外原因导致的医源性早产(iPTB - noPE)。

结果

sPTB、iPTB - PE和iPTB - noPE的估计发病率分别为3.4%、0.8%和1.6%。三联检测法对应的检测率分别为17%、82%和25%,NICE指南对应的检测率分别为12%、39%和19%,两种方法的总体筛查阳性率均为10.2%。阿司匹林预防的估计比例分别为14%、65%和0%。

结论

三联检测法对sPTB和iPTB - noPE的预测效果较差,NICE指南的预测效果更差。阿司匹林对sPTB和iPTB - noPE均未显著降低。

相似文献

1
First-trimester prediction of preterm pre-eclampsia and prophylaxis by aspirin: Effect on spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm birth.孕早期早产型先兆子痫的预测及阿司匹林预防:对自发性和医源性早产的影响。
BJOG. 2024 Mar;131(4):483-492. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17673. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
2
Routine first-trimester pre-eclampsia screening and risk of preterm birth.常规早孕期子痫前期筛查与早产风险。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;60(2):185-191. doi: 10.1002/uog.24915. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
3
Prediction and prevention of small-for-gestational-age neonates: evidence from SPREE and ASPRE.预测和预防小于胎龄儿:来自 SPREE 和 ASPRE 的证据。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;52(1):52-59. doi: 10.1002/uog.19077. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
4
ASPRE trial: risk factors for development of preterm pre-eclampsia despite aspirin prophylaxis.ASPRE 试验:尽管进行了阿司匹林预防,早产子痫前期发展的风险因素。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;58(4):546-552. doi: 10.1002/uog.23668. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
5
Prospective evaluation of screening performance of first-trimester prediction models for preterm preeclampsia in an Asian population.前瞻性评估亚洲人群中早孕期预测早产子痫前期模型的筛查性能。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):650.e1-650.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.041. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
6
ASPRE trial: incidence of preterm pre-eclampsia in patients fulfilling ACOG and NICE criteria according to risk by FMF algorithm.ASPRE 试验:根据 FMF 算法风险,符合 ACOG 和 NICE 标准的患者中早产子痫前期的发生率。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;51(6):738-742. doi: 10.1002/uog.19019. Epub 2018 May 3.
7
Serum PlGF compared with PAPP-A in first trimester screening for preterm pre-eclampsia: Adjusting for the effect of aspirin treatment.早孕期筛查早产子痫前期中血清 PlGF 与 PAPP-A 的比较:调整阿司匹林治疗的影响。
BJOG. 2022 Jul;129(8):1308-1317. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17096. Epub 2022 Feb 13.
8
ASPRE trial: performance of screening for preterm pre-eclampsia.ASPRE 试验:早产子痫前期筛查的表现。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;50(4):492-495. doi: 10.1002/uog.18816. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
9
Screening for pre-eclampsia at 11-13 weeks' gestation: use of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, placental growth factor or both.11-13 孕周筛查子痫前期:使用妊娠相关血浆蛋白-A、胎盘生长因子或两者联合。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;56(3):400-407. doi: 10.1002/uog.22093. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
10
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of early screening for pre-eclampsia by NICE guidelines and a method combining maternal factors and biomarkers: results of SPREE.NICE 指南指导下的早期子痫前期筛查诊断准确性比较及联合母体外周血标志物和母体因素的方法:SPREE 研究结果。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;51(6):743-750. doi: 10.1002/uog.19039. Epub 2018 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Aspirin on Timing of Birth in Pregnancies With Clinical Manifestations of Placental Dysfunction: Evidence From a Multicentre Randomised Clinical Trial.阿司匹林对伴有胎盘功能障碍临床表现的妊娠分娩时间的影响:一项多中心随机临床试验的证据
BJOG. 2025 May 14. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18211.