• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度顺势疗法从业者治疗糖尿病的实践、处方习惯、经验及认知:一项在线观察性研究。

Practice, prescription habits, experience and perception of Indian homeopathic practitioners in treatment of diabetes mellitus: An online observational study.

作者信息

Varanasi Roja, Srivastava Amit, Kumar Rt Shaji, Bala Renu

机构信息

Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, New Delhi, Jawahar Lal Nehru Bhartiya Chikitsa Avum Homoeopathy Anusandhan Bhawan, 61-65, Institutional Area, Opposite D-Block, Janakpuri, New Delhi 110058, India.

Regional Research Institute for Homoeopathy, (Under Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, New Delhi), New Checkon, Opposite Tribal Colony, Imphal East, Manipur 795001, India.

出版信息

J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2023 Sep-Oct;14(5):100787. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2023.100787. Epub 2023 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaim.2023.100787
PMID:37751636
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10692382/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown homoeopathy to effectively control blood sugar levels and improve quality of life (QOL), though a standard treatment protocol is required.

OBJECTIVE

This study intended to assess the homoeopathic practice, prescription habits, experience, and perception of Indian Homeopathic Practitioners (HPs) in treating DM.

METHODOLOGY

A web-based cross-sectional with a snowball sampling method was conducted between 30th July 2021 and 18th August 2021. A questionnaire to record clinical attributes of Indian HPs in the management of DM was formed after the consensus of the subject experts and pilot testing for feasibility.

RESULTS

Participants were 513 HPs with mean age [Standard Deviation (SD)] of 40.44 years (11.16) and a mean duration of the homoeopathic medical practice of 14.67 years [95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 13.71-15.63]. The majority of HPs made classical homoeopathic prescription (201, 39.2%) though the success in the management of DM was better among HPs who prescribed more than one potentized medicine [vs classical prescription, Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.34, p = 0.032]. As perceived by the HPs, homoeopathic treatment resulted in a major improvement in QOL of the diabetic patients (418, 81.5%) with very few adverse effect (100, 19.5%). The blood sugar level was controlled better when homoeopathy was given alongside conventional medicine (348, 67.8%).

CONCLUSION

The clinical experience of HPs in this study has shown that homoeopathic treatment can benefit DM patients in preventing complications and improving QOL. It further reported that homoeopathy can be an important adjuvant to conventional treatment in managing DM.

摘要

背景

研究表明顺势疗法能有效控制血糖水平并改善生活质量(QOL),不过仍需要一个标准治疗方案。

目的

本研究旨在评估印度顺势疗法从业者(HP)在治疗糖尿病方面的顺势疗法实践、处方习惯、经验及看法。

方法

于2021年7月30日至2021年8月18日采用基于网络的横断面研究及雪球抽样方法。在主题专家达成共识并进行可行性预试验后,形成了一份记录印度HP在糖尿病管理中临床特征的问卷。

结果

参与者为513名HP,平均年龄[标准差(SD)]为40.44岁(11.16),顺势疗法医疗实践的平均时长为14.67年[95%置信区间(CI)=13.71 - 15.63]。大多数HP采用经典顺势疗法处方(201名,39.2%),不过在处方一种以上增效药物的HP中,糖尿病管理的成功率更高[与经典处方相比,优势比(OR)=2.34,p = 0.032]。在HP看来,顺势疗法治疗使糖尿病患者的生活质量有了显著改善(418名,81.5%),不良反应极少(100名,19.5%)。顺势疗法与传统药物同时使用时,血糖水平控制得更好(348名,67.8%)。

结论

本研究中HP的临床经验表明,顺势疗法治疗可使糖尿病患者在预防并发症和改善生活质量方面受益。研究还进一步报告称,顺势疗法在糖尿病管理中可成为传统治疗的重要辅助手段。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d37/10692382/f3215132b52d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d37/10692382/8c657e4558aa/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d37/10692382/71e61edadaf9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d37/10692382/f3215132b52d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d37/10692382/8c657e4558aa/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d37/10692382/71e61edadaf9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d37/10692382/f3215132b52d/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Practice, prescription habits, experience and perception of Indian homeopathic practitioners in treatment of diabetes mellitus: An online observational study.印度顺势疗法从业者治疗糖尿病的实践、处方习惯、经验及认知:一项在线观察性研究。
J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2023 Sep-Oct;14(5):100787. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2023.100787. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
2
Paediatric homoeopathy in general practice: where, when and why?全科医疗中的儿科顺势疗法:地点、时间与原因?
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Jun;59(6):743-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02213.x.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Efficacy of homoeopathic treatment for diabetic distal symmetric polyneuropathy: A multicentric randomised double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.顺势疗法治疗糖尿病远端对称性多发性神经病的疗效:一项多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照临床试验。
Explore (NY). 2021 Sep-Oct;17(5):417-423. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 May 22.
5
Comparative effectiveness of homoeopathic vs. conventional therapy in usual care of atopic eczema in children: long-term medical and economic outcomes.顺势疗法与常规疗法在儿童特应性皮炎常规护理中的比较效果:长期的医疗和经济结果。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054973. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
6
Homoeopathy vs. conventional primary care in children during the first 24 months of life-a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.顺势疗法与常规初级保健在儿童生命的头 24 个月 - 一项实用的随机对照试验。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Dec;183(12):5455-5465. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05791-1. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
7
Randomised controlled trial to compare efficacy of standard care alone and in combination with homoeopathic treatment of moderate/severe COVID-19 cases.随机对照试验比较单独使用标准护理与联合顺势疗法治疗中度/重度 COVID-19 病例的疗效。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 15;18(11):e0292783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292783. eCollection 2023.
8
Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy.顺势疗法的临床效果是安慰剂效应吗?顺势疗法与对抗疗法的安慰剂对照试验比较研究。
Lancet. 2005;366(9487):726-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67177-2.
9
[Clinical medicine and homeopathy].[临床医学与顺势疗法]
Padiatr Padol. 1992;27(6):A95-100.
10
Homeopathy.顺势疗法
Med Clin North Am. 2002 Jan;86(1):47-62. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(03)00071-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Global prevalence and types of complementary and alternative medicines use amongst adults with diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis.全球成年人糖尿病患者中补充和替代医学的使用情况和类型:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Sep;77(9):1259-1274. doi: 10.1007/s00228-021-03097-x. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Metformin for Obesity: A Systematic Review.二甲双胍治疗肥胖的疗效和安全性:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2021 Mar;147(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1610.
3
Adverse effects in homeopathy. A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
顺势疗法的不良反应。观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Explore (NY). 2022 Jan-Feb;18(1):114-128. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2020.11.008. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
4
Economic menace of diabetes in India: a systematic review.印度糖尿病的经济威胁:一项系统综述。
Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2020 Oct;40(4):464-475. doi: 10.1007/s13410-020-00838-z. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
5
Efficacy of homoeopathic treatment for diabetic distal symmetric polyneuropathy: A multicentric randomised double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.顺势疗法治疗糖尿病远端对称性多发性神经病的疗效:一项多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照临床试验。
Explore (NY). 2021 Sep-Oct;17(5):417-423. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 May 22.
6
Role of AYUSH Therapies in Modern Medicine: A Qualitative Study to Explore the Awareness and Attitudes of Doctors Towards the Utilization of Alternate System of Medicine for Diabetes Mellitus.阿育吠陀疗法在现代医学中的作用:一项定性研究,以探索医生对使用替代医学治疗糖尿病的认知和态度。
Int J Gen Med. 2020 Jan 13;13:1-8. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S220444. eCollection 2020.
7
Adherence, satisfaction, and experience with metformin 500 mg prolonged release formulation in Indian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a postmarketing observational study.印度2型糖尿病患者对500毫克二甲双胍缓释制剂的依从性、满意度及用药体验:一项上市后观察性研究
Int J Gen Med. 2019 Apr 9;12:147-159. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S179622. eCollection 2019.
8
Comment on Monami et al. "Alternative treatment or alternative to treatment? A systematic review of randomized trials on homeopathic preparations for diabetes and obesity".关于莫纳米等人的评论。“替代治疗还是治疗的替代物?对顺势疗法治疗糖尿病和肥胖症的随机试验的系统评价”
Acta Diabetol. 2019 Feb;56(2):245-246. doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1247-3. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
9
Utilization, preference, perception and characteristics of people adopting traditional and AYUSH systems of medicine in India: a systematic review.印度采用传统医学和阿育吠陀医学体系人群的利用情况、偏好、认知及特征:一项系统评价
J Complement Integr Med. 2018 Oct 18;16(2):/j/jcim.2019.16.issue-2/jcim-2018-0020/jcim-2018-0020.xml. doi: 10.1515/jcim-2018-0020.
10
Alternative treatment or alternative to treatment? A systematic review of randomized trials on homeopathic preparations for diabetes and obesity.替代治疗还是治疗替代方案?关于顺势疗法制剂治疗糖尿病和肥胖症的随机试验的系统评价。
Acta Diabetol. 2019 Feb;56(2):241-243. doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1235-7. Epub 2018 Sep 27.