Suppr超能文献

定量方法对微纤维评估的影响 - 基于质量和计数的方法比较分析。

Impact of quantification method on microfiber assessment - A comparative analysis between mass and count based methods.

机构信息

Department of Fashion Technology, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, 641004, India.

Department of Fashion Technology, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, 641004, India.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2023 Dec 1;347:119040. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119040. Epub 2023 Sep 24.

Abstract

Microfiber from textiles is one of the new anthropogenic pollutants which attracted a wide range of researchers. Domestic laundry, being the most common cause of microfiber release from textiles, is widely studied. Studies exhibit a broad range of quantities of microfibers owing to the distinct quantification methodologies employed due to their convenience and resource availability. Out of several such estimation processes, reporting microfiber quantity in numbers or mass (mg or g) is quite common with respect to the unit area or weight of the textile used. However, results reported by different literature vary significantly. Hence, this study aims to analyze the microfiber release from knitted polyester fabric using count- and mass-based methods. Four different fabrics were used for this study with three different counting processes from literature along with direct weight difference estimation. The results of the direct counting method showed that the average microfiber release of selected fabrics is 13.28-33.16 microfibers per sq.cm, whereas, the direct weight estimation showed an average weight of 0.0664 ± 0.0289 mg/sq.cm. The subsequent conversion showed a release of 887.89 ± 633.49 microfibers/sq.cm of the fabric. Further, the microfiber mass was also estimated using the number of microfiber count and found that a sq.cm of fabric releases up to 0.0010-0.0024 mg of microfibers. While comparing the results, the weight-based estimation showed a significantly higher microfiber release (41.3-42.9 times) than the direct counting method. The deposition of surfactants in detergents, contaminants from the water, atmospheric contaminants, and finishes released from the fabric can be the sources of additional weights noted in the direct mass estimation. As the weight-based method is quite simple and the fastest way to quantify the microfibers, future studies must focus on this area to reduce the error percentage in quantification.

摘要

微纤维是一种新型的人为污染物,引起了广泛的研究。家庭洗涤是纺织品中微纤维释放的最常见原因,因此受到广泛研究。由于所采用的量化方法不同,导致研究结果显示出广泛的微纤维数量范围,这些方法因方便和资源可用性而被广泛采用。在这些估计过程中,由于方便和资源可用性,报道的微纤维数量通常以数量或质量(毫克或克)表示,相对于使用的纺织品的单位面积或重量。然而,不同文献报道的结果差异很大。因此,本研究旨在使用计数和质量两种方法分析针织聚酯纤维布的微纤维释放情况。这项研究使用了四种不同的织物,其中三种来自文献的计数方法和一种直接重量差估计方法。直接计数方法的结果表明,所选织物的平均微纤维释放量为每平方厘米 13.28-33.16 根微纤维,而直接重量估计值为每平方厘米 0.0664 ± 0.0289 毫克。随后的转换表明,每平方厘米织物的微纤维释放量为 887.89 ± 633.49 根。此外,还使用微纤维计数数量来估算微纤维的质量,发现每平方厘米织物释放的微纤维质量高达 0.0010-0.0024 毫克。在比较结果时,基于重量的估计显示出比直接计数方法更高的微纤维释放量(41.3-42.9 倍)。洗涤剂中的表面活性剂沉积、水中的污染物、大气污染物和织物释放的整理剂可能是直接质量估计中注意到的额外重量的来源。由于基于重量的方法非常简单,也是量化微纤维最快的方法,因此未来的研究必须集中在这一领域,以减少量化中的误差百分比。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验