Mahoney Liam, Raffaeli Genny, Beken Serdar, Ünal Sezin, Kotidis Charalampos, Cavallaro Giacomo, Garrido Felipe, Bhatt Aomesh, Dempsey Eugene M, Allegaert Karel, Simons Sinno H P, Flint Robert B, Smits Anne
University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Pediatr Res. 2024 Jan;95(1):75-83. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02779-9. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
Many drugs are used off-label or unlicensed in neonates. This does not mean they are used without evidence or knowledge. We aimed to apply and evaluate the Grading and Assessment of Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Studies (GAPPS) scoring system for the level of evidence of two commonly used anti-epileptic drugs.
Midazolam and phenobarbital as anti-epileptics were evaluated with a systematic literature search on neonatal pharmacokinetic (PK) and/or pharmacodynamic [PD, (amplitude-integrated) electroencephalography effect] studies. With the GAPPS system, two evaluators graded the current level of evidence. Inter-rater agreement was assessed for dosing evidence score (DES), quality of evidence (QoE), and strength of recommendation (REC).
Seventy-two studies were included. DES scores 4 and 9 were most frequently used for PK, and scores 0 and 1 for PD. Inter-rater agreements on DES, QoE, and REC ranged from moderate to very good. A final REC was provided for all PK studies, but only for 25% (midazolam) and 33% (phenobarbital) of PD studies.
There is a reasonable level of evidence concerning midazolam and phenobarbital PK in neonates, although using a predefined target without integrated PK/PD evaluation. Further research is needed on midazolam use in term neonates with therapeutic hypothermia, and phenobarbital treatment in preterms.
There is a reasonable level of evidence concerning pharmacotherapy of midazolam and phenobarbital in neonates. Most evidence is however based on PK studies, using a predefined target level or concentration range without integrated, combined PK/PD evaluation. Using the GAPPS system, final strength of recommendation could be provided for all PK studies, but only for 25% (midazolam) to 33% (phenobarbital) of PD studies. Due to the limited PK observations of midazolam in term neonates with therapeutic hypothermia, and of phenobarbital in preterm neonates these subgroups can be identified for further research.
许多药物在新生儿中存在超说明书或未获许可使用的情况。但这并不意味着它们是在没有证据或认知的情况下使用的。我们旨在应用和评估药代动力学 - 药效学研究分级与评估(GAPPS)评分系统,以评估两种常用抗癫痫药物的证据水平。
通过对新生儿药代动力学(PK)和/或药效学[PD,(振幅整合)脑电图效应]研究进行系统的文献检索,对作为抗癫痫药物的咪达唑仑和苯巴比妥进行评估。使用GAPPS系统,两名评估者对当前的证据水平进行分级。评估者间在给药证据评分(DES)、证据质量(QoE)和推荐强度(REC)方面的一致性。
纳入了72项研究。PK研究最常使用的DES评分为4和9,PD研究最常使用的评分为0和1。评估者间在DES、QoE和REC方面的一致性从中度到非常好不等。为所有PK研究提供了最终的REC,但仅为25%(咪达唑仑)和33%(苯巴比妥)的PD研究提供了最终REC。
关于新生儿咪达唑仑和苯巴比妥的PK,有合理水平的证据,尽管在没有综合PK/PD评估的情况下使用了预定义目标。对于治疗性低温足月新生儿使用咪达唑仑以及早产儿使用苯巴比妥治疗,还需要进一步研究。
关于新生儿咪达唑仑和苯巴比妥的药物治疗有合理水平的证据。然而,大多数证据基于PK研究,使用预定义的目标水平或浓度范围,而没有综合的、联合的PK/PD评估。使用GAPPS系统,可以为所有PK研究提供最终推荐强度,但仅为25%(咪达唑仑)至33%(苯巴比妥)的PD研究提供最终推荐强度。由于治疗性低温足月新生儿中咪达唑仑以及早产儿中苯巴比妥的PK观察有限,这些亚组可被确定用于进一步研究。