Suppr超能文献

在美国一项基于医院的观察性研究中,与4因子凝血酶原复合物浓缩剂相比,阿哌沙班治疗Xa因子抑制剂相关的严重出血时死亡率更低。

Lower mortality with andexanet alfa vs 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for factor Xa inhibitor-related major bleeding in a U.S. hospital-based observational study.

作者信息

Dobesh Paul P, Fermann Gregory J, Christoph Mary J, Koch Bruce, Lesén Eva, Chen Hungta, Lovelace Belinda, Dettling Theresa, Danese Mark, Ulloa Julie, Danese Sherry, Coleman Craig I

机构信息

University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Pharmacy, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2023 Aug 30;7(6):102192. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102192. eCollection 2023 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Well-designed studies with sufficient sample size comparing andexanet alfa vs 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) in routine clinical practice to evaluate clinical outcomes are limited.

OBJECTIVES

To compare in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized with rivaroxaban- or apixaban-related major bleeding who were treated with andexanet alfa or 4F-PCC.

METHODS

An observational cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05548777) was conducted using electronic health records between May 2018 and September 2022 from 354 U.S. hospitals. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, inpatient admission with diagnosis code D68.32 (bleeding due to extrinsic anticoagulation), a record of use of the factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban or apixaban, andexanet alfa or 4F-PCC treatment during index hospitalization, and a documented discharge disposition. Multivariable logistic regression on in-hospital mortality with andexanet alfa vs 4F-PCC was performed. The robustness of the results was assessed via a supportive propensity score-weighted logistic regression.

RESULTS

The analysis included 4395 patients (andexanet alfa,  = 2122; 4F-PCC,  = 2273). There were 1328 patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), 2567 with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeds, and 500 with critical compartment or other bleed types. In the multivariable analysis, odds of in-hospital mortality were 50% lower for andexanet alfa vs 4F-PCC (odds ratio [OR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.39-0.65;  < .01) and were consistent for both ICH (OR, 0.55; [0.39-0.76];  < .01) and GI bleeds (OR, 0.49 [0.29-0.81];  = .01). Similar results were obtained from the supporting propensity score-weighted logistic regression analyses.

CONCLUSION

In this large observational study, treatment with andexanet alfa in patients hospitalized with rivaroxaban- or apixaban-related major bleeds was associated with 50% lower odds of in-hospital mortality than 4F-PCC. The magnitude of the risk reduction was similar in ICH and GI bleeds.

摘要

背景

在常规临床实践中,比较安多凝血素α与四因子凝血酶原复合物浓缩剂(4F-PCC)并评估临床结局的设计良好且样本量充足的研究有限。

目的

比较接受安多凝血素α或4F-PCC治疗的因利伐沙班或阿哌沙班相关大出血住院患者的院内死亡率。

方法

使用2018年5月至2022年9月期间来自354家美国医院的电子健康记录进行了一项观察性队列研究(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05548777)。纳入标准为年龄≥18岁;因诊断代码D68.32(外源性抗凝导致的出血)住院;有使用Xa因子抑制剂利伐沙班或阿哌沙班的记录;在索引住院期间接受安多凝血素α或4F-PCC治疗;以及有记录的出院处置情况。对安多凝血素α与4F-PCC的院内死亡率进行多变量逻辑回归分析。通过支持性倾向评分加权逻辑回归评估结果的稳健性。

结果

分析纳入4395例患者(安多凝血素α组,n = 2122;4F-PCC组,n =  2273)。有1328例颅内出血(ICH)患者,2567例胃肠道(GI)出血患者,500例严重腔隙或其他出血类型患者。在多变量分析中,安多凝血素α组的院内死亡几率比4F-PCC组低50%(比值比[OR],0.50;95%置信区间[CI],0.39 - 0.65;P <.01),在ICH患者(OR,0.55;[0.39 - 0.76];P <.01)和GI出血患者中(OR,0.49 [0.29 - 0.81];P = .01)也是如此。支持性倾向评分加权逻辑回归分析得出了类似结果。

结论

在这项大型观察性研究中,因利伐沙班或阿哌沙班相关大出血住院的患者接受安多凝血素α治疗的院内死亡几率比接受4F-PCC治疗低50%。在ICH和GI出血患者中,风险降低幅度相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/023f/10518480/3489ed9eb033/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验