Suppr超能文献

战术人群压力的主观和客观测量方法研究:一项范围综述

An Examination of Subjective and Objective Measures of Stress in Tactical Populations: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Tramel Whitney, Schram Ben, Canetti Elisa, Orr Robin

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, QLD 4226, Australia.

Tactical Research Unit, Bond University, Robina, QLD 4226, Australia.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 11;11(18):2515. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11182515.

Abstract

Persons working in tactical occupations are often exposed to high-stress situations. If this stress is to be measured, an understanding of the stress outcomes used in these occupations is needed. The aim of this review was to capture and critically appraise research investigating subjective and objective outcome measures of physiological stress in tactical occupations. Several literature databases (PubMed, EMBASE, EBsco) were searched using key search words and terms. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were critically evaluated and scored by two authors using the Joanne Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool. Of 17,171 articles, 42 studies were retained. The Cohen's Kappa agreement between authors was 0.829 with a mean JBI Score of included studies of 8.1/9 ± 0.37 points. Multiple subjective and objective measures were assessed during a variety of high-stress tasks and environments across different occupations, including police officers, emergency service personnel, firefighters, and soldiers in the military. Common objective outcomes measures were heart rate, cortisol, and body temperature, and subjective measures were ratings of perceived exertion, and the Self Trait Anxiety Inventory. Often used in combination (i.e., subjective and objective), these outcome measures can be used to monitor stressors faced by tactical personnel undergoing on-the-job training.

摘要

从事战术职业的人员经常面临高压力的情况。如果要衡量这种压力,就需要了解这些职业中所使用的压力结果。本综述的目的是收集并批判性地评估有关战术职业中生理压力的主观和客观结果测量的研究。使用关键搜索词在几个文献数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、EBsco)中进行了检索。符合纳入标准的研究由两位作者使用乔安妮·布里格斯研究所(JBI)的批判性评估工具进行严格评估和评分。在17171篇文章中,保留了42项研究。作者之间的科恩kappa一致性为0.829,纳入研究的JBI平均评分为8.1/9 ± 0.37分。在不同职业(包括警察、应急服务人员、消防员和军人)的各种高压力任务和环境中,评估了多种主观和客观测量方法。常见的客观结果测量方法是心率、皮质醇和体温,主观测量方法是感知运动用力评分和自我特质焦虑量表。这些结果测量方法通常结合使用(即主观和客观),可用于监测接受在职培训的战术人员所面临的压力源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c024/10530665/51cf726f48f4/healthcare-11-02515-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验