• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中风患者功能状态测量中的最小临床重要差异(MCID):逆概率治疗加权法

Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in the Functional Status Measures in Patients with Stroke: Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting.

作者信息

Chang Yu-Chien, Lin Hsiu-Fen, Chen Yu-Fu, Chen Hong-Yaw, Shiu Yu-Tsz, Shi Hon-Yi

机构信息

Division of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yuan's General Hospital, Kaohsiung 80249, Taiwan.

Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 7;12(18):5828. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185828.

DOI:10.3390/jcm12185828
PMID:37762771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10532241/
Abstract

This study proposed to evaluate the temporal trend, define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for five functional status measures, and identify risk factors for reaching deterioration in the MCID. This prospective cohort study analyzed 680 patients with ischemic stroke and 151 patients with hemorrhagic stroke at six hospitals between April 2015 and October 2021. All patients completed the functional status measures before rehabilitation (baseline), and at the 12th week and 2nd year after rehabilitation. Patients in the post-acute care (PAC) group exhibited significantly larger improvements for the functional status measures compared to those in the non-PAC group ( < 0.05). Patients with hemorrhagic stroke also displayed larger improvements in the functional status measures when compared to patients with ischemic stroke. Furthermore, the improvement in MCID ranged from 0.01 to 16.18 points when comparing baseline and the 12th week after rehabilitation, but the deterioration in MCID ranged from 0.38 to 16.12 points. Simultaneously, assessing the baseline and the second year after rehabilitation, the improvement in MCID ranged from 0.01 to 18.43 points, but the deterioration in MCID ranged from 0.68 to 17.26 points. Additionally, the PAC program, age, education level, body mass index, smoking, readmission within 30 days, baseline functional status score, use of Foley catheter and nasogastric tube, as well as a history of previous stroke are significantly associated with achieving deterioration in MCID ( < 0.05). These findings suggest that if the mean change scores of the functional status measures have reached the thresholds, the change scores can be perceived by patients as clinically important.

摘要

本研究旨在评估时间趋势,确定五项功能状态指标的最小临床重要差异(MCID),并识别达到MCID恶化的风险因素。这项前瞻性队列研究分析了2015年4月至2021年10月期间六家医院的680例缺血性脑卒中患者和151例出血性脑卒中患者。所有患者在康复前(基线)、康复后第12周和第2年完成功能状态指标评估。与非急性后期护理(PAC)组相比,PAC组患者的功能状态指标改善更为显著(<0.05)。与缺血性脑卒中患者相比,出血性脑卒中患者的功能状态指标改善也更大。此外,比较基线和康复后第12周时,MCID的改善范围为0.01至16.18分,但MCID的恶化范围为0.38至16.12分。同时,评估基线和康复后第二年时,MCID的改善范围为0.01至18.43分,但MCID的恶化范围为0.68至17.26分。此外,PAC项目、年龄、教育水平、体重指数、吸烟、30天内再次入院、基线功能状态评分、使用Foley导管和鼻胃管以及既往脑卒中病史与MCID恶化显著相关(<0.05)。这些发现表明,如果功能状态指标的平均变化分数达到阈值,患者可将这些变化分数视为具有临床重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c5/10532241/01eeba48428b/jcm-12-05828-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c5/10532241/fd0135283170/jcm-12-05828-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c5/10532241/01eeba48428b/jcm-12-05828-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c5/10532241/fd0135283170/jcm-12-05828-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c5/10532241/01eeba48428b/jcm-12-05828-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in the Functional Status Measures in Patients with Stroke: Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting.中风患者功能状态测量中的最小临床重要差异(MCID):逆概率治疗加权法
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 7;12(18):5828. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185828.
2
Multidisciplinary Care after Acute Care for Stroke: A Prospective Comparison between a Multidisciplinary Post-Acute Care Group and a Standard Group Matched by Propensity Score.急性脑卒中后多学科治疗:多学科急性后治疗组与倾向评分匹配的标准组的前瞻性比较
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 20;18(14):7696. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147696.
3
What Is the Clinical Benefit of Common Orthopaedic Procedures as Assessed by the PROMIS Versus Other Validated Outcomes Tools?常见骨科手术的临床获益有哪些?与其他经过验证的结局评估工具相比,PROMIS 评估如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Sep 1;480(9):1672-1681. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002241. Epub 2022 May 10.
4
General cognition predicts post-stroke recovery defined through minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a cohort study in an Italian rehabilitation clinic.一般认知能力可预测通过最小临床重要差异(MCID)定义的中风后恢复情况:一项在意大利康复诊所进行的队列研究。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Oct;51(5):597-606. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
5
Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?测试最小临床重要差异:共识还是难题?
Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.10.015.
6
Assessing health status over time: impact of recall period and anchor question on the minimal clinically important difference of copd health status tools.评估随时间推移的健康状况:回顾期和锚定问题对 COPD 健康状况工具的最小临床重要差异的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jun 26;16(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0950-7.
7
Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke.确定中风患者功能独立性测量量表的最小临床重要差异。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jan;87(1):32-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.130.
8
Establishing the minimal clinically important difference of the Barthel Index in stroke patients.确定中风患者巴氏指数的最小临床重要差异。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 May-Jun;21(3):233-8. doi: 10.1177/1545968306294729. Epub 2007 Mar 9.
9
When Do Patients Improve After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement? A Prospective Cohort Analysis.髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼撞击症后患者何时改善?一项前瞻性队列分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Nov;46(13):3111-3118. doi: 10.1177/0363546518795696. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
10
What Preoperative Factors are Associated With Not Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference After THA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.哪些术前因素与 THA 后未达到最小临床重要差异有关?一项国际多中心研究的结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jun;477(6):1301-1312. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000667.

本文引用的文献

1
Post-Acute Care Rehabilitation Services and Outcomes in Skilled Nursing Facilities Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情之前及期间,熟练护理机构中的急性后期护理康复服务与结果
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Mar 3;4(3):e230019. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0019.
2
New Directions for Improving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Use in Clinical Care and Research.改善患者报告结局测量中最小临床重要差异的新方向,用于临床护理和研究。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Mar 1;149(3):276-277. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.4733.
3
Mechanical thrombectomy in minor stroke due to isolated M2 occlusion: a multicenter retrospective matched analysis.
机械取栓治疗孤立 M2 段闭塞所致轻型卒中:多中心回顾性配对分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Nov;15(e2):e198-e203. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019557. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
4
Characteristics of COVID-19 Inpatients in Rehabilitation Units during the First Pandemic Wave: A Cohort Study from a Large Hospital in Champagne Region.疫情第一波期间康复病房中新冠病毒肺炎住院患者的特征:来自香槟地区一家大型医院的队列研究
Biology (Basel). 2022 Jun 20;11(6):937. doi: 10.3390/biology11060937.
5
Minimal clinically important difference of the Berg Balance Scale and comfortable walking speed in patients with acute stroke: A multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study.伯格平衡量表与急性脑卒中患者舒适行走速度的最小临床重要差异:一项多中心、前瞻性、纵向研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2022 Nov;36(11):1512-1523. doi: 10.1177/02692155221108552. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
6
Post-acute care transitions and outcomes among medicare beneficiaries in assisted living communities.辅助生活社区中医疗保险受益人的急性后期护理过渡与结局
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 May;70(5):1429-1441. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17669. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
7
Posterior Circulation Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Vessels Occlusion in Patients Presenting with NIHSS Score ≤ 10.美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分≤10分的大血管闭塞患者的后循环血管内血栓切除术
Life (Basel). 2021 Dec 17;11(12):1423. doi: 10.3390/life11121423.
8
Current Status of Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Regional Cardiocerebrovascular Centers in Korea.韩国地区心脑血管中心心脏康复的现状
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 29;10(21):5079. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215079.
9
Multidisciplinary Care after Acute Care for Stroke: A Prospective Comparison between a Multidisciplinary Post-Acute Care Group and a Standard Group Matched by Propensity Score.急性脑卒中后多学科治疗:多学科急性后治疗组与倾向评分匹配的标准组的前瞻性比较
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 20;18(14):7696. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147696.
10
Minimal clinically important difference of Gait Assessment and Intervention Tool (GAIT) in patients with sub-acute stroke.步态评估及干预工具(GAIT)在亚急性脑卒中患者中的最小临床重要差异。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Dec;57(6):874-878. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06735-6. Epub 2021 Jul 12.