Duchenne Jürgen, Larsen Camilla K, Cvijic Marta, Galli Elena, Aalen John M, Klop Boudewijn, Mirea Oana, Puvrez Alexis, Bézy Stéphanie, Wouters Laurine, Minten Lennert, Sirnes Per A, Khan Faraz H, Voros Gabor, Willems Rik, Penicka Martin, Kongsgård Erik, Hopp Einar, Bogaert Jan, Smiseth Otto A, Donal Erwan, Voigt Jens-Uwe
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 21;12(18):6108. doi: 10.3390/jcm12186108.
The presence of mechanical dyssynchrony on echocardiography is associated with reverse remodelling and decreased mortality after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Contrarily, myocardial scar reduces the effect of CRT. This study investigated how well a combined assessment of different markers of mechanical dyssynchrony and scarring identifies CRT responders. In a prospective multicentre study of 170 CRT recipients, septal flash (SF), apical rocking (ApRock), systolic stretch index (SSI), and lateral-to-septal (LW-S) work differences were assessed using echocardiography. Myocardial scarring was quantified using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) or excluded based on a coronary angiogram and clinical history. The primary endpoint was a CRT response, defined as a ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume 12 months after implantation. The secondary endpoint was time-to-death. The combined assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony and septal scarring showed AUCs ranging between 0.81 (95%CI: 0.74-0.88) and 0.86 (95%CI: 0.79-0.91) for predicting a CRT response, without significant differences between the markers, but significantly higher than mechanical dyssynchrony alone. QRS morphology, QRS duration, and LV ejection fraction were not superior in their prediction. Predictive power was similar in the subgroups of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The combined assessments significantly predicted all-cause mortality at 44 ± 13 months after CRT with a hazard ratio ranging from 0.28 (95%CI: 0.12-0.67) to 0.20 (95%CI: 0.08-0.49). The combined assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony and septal scarring identified CRT responders with high predictive power. Both visual and quantitative markers were highly feasible and demonstrated similar results. This work demonstrates the value of imaging LV mechanics and scarring in CRT candidates, which can already be achieved in a clinical routine.
超声心动图显示的机械性不同步与心脏再同步治疗(CRT)后的逆向重构及死亡率降低相关。相反,心肌瘢痕会降低CRT的疗效。本研究调查了综合评估不同的机械性不同步和瘢痕形成标志物对识别CRT反应者的效果如何。在一项对170名CRT接受者的前瞻性多中心研究中,使用超声心动图评估了室间隔闪烁(SF)、心尖摆动(ApRock)、收缩期伸展指数(SSI)以及侧壁与室间隔(LW-S)的做功差异。使用心脏磁共振成像(CMR)对心肌瘢痕进行量化,或根据冠状动脉造影和临床病史排除瘢痕。主要终点是CRT反应,定义为植入后12个月左心室收缩末期容积减少≥15%。次要终点是死亡时间。机械性不同步和室间隔瘢痕的综合评估显示,预测CRT反应的曲线下面积(AUC)在0.81(95%置信区间:0.74 - 0.88)至0.86(95%置信区间:0.79 - 0.91)之间,各标志物之间无显著差异,但显著高于单独的机械性不同步。QRS形态、QRS时限和左心室射血分数在预测方面并不更优。在缺血性心肌病患者亚组中,预测能力相似。综合评估显著预测了CRT后44±13个月的全因死亡率,危险比范围为0.28(95%置信区间:0.12 - 0.67)至0.20(95%置信区间:0.08 - 0.49)。机械性不同步和室间隔瘢痕的综合评估能够以较高的预测能力识别CRT反应者。视觉和定量标志物都高度可行且结果相似。这项研究证明了在CRT候选者中对左心室力学和瘢痕进行成像的价值,这在临床常规中已经可以实现。