Suppr超能文献

肩袖损伤关节镜修复术后ASES和Constant-Murley评分、内旋/移位及Jobe试验的纵向分析

Longitudinal Analysis of the ASES and Constant-Murley Scores, and the Internal Rotation/Shift and Jobe Tests Following Arthroscopic Repair of Supraspinatus Lesions.

作者信息

Fieseler George, Laudner Kevin, Cornelius Jakob, Schulze Stephan, Delank Karl-Stefan, Schwesig René

机构信息

Clinic for Hand, Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Sports Medicine, Clinic Hann, Münden, 34346 Hannoversch Münden, Germany.

Department of Health Sciences, Hybl Sports Medicine and Performance Center, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO 80918, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2023 Aug 25;13(9):1304. doi: 10.3390/jpm13091304.

Abstract

It is essential to investigate patients post-surgery using functional surveys like the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) and the Constant-Murley shoulder (CMS) scores, as well as clinical tests, such as the Internal Rotation and Shift (IRO/Shift) and Jobe tests. In this study, 51 out of an initial 87 patients underwent an arthroscopic supraspinatus repair (22 single-row, 16 double-row, 13 debridement). Testing occurred pre-surgery, and 3 and 6 months post-surgery. Both surveys showed significant improvements over time among all 87 patients, but there were no differences between groups (lesion/no lesion) ( > 0.815) or time × group ( > 0.895). The IRO/Shift test showed a stronger ability to distinguish between both groups (positive vs. negative) with respect to the ASES and CMS scores over time, but the Jobe test did not ( > 0.100). Improvements in the CMS scores and the Jobe test were lower following repair compared to the ASES and IRO/Shift test. Most patients returned to adequate levels of functional abilities at 6 months post-surgery. The time required to return to activities of daily living and negative clinical tests was longer for the double-row repair patients compared to the single-row and debridement groups. In conclusion, both the functional surveys and the clinical tests demonstrated improvements following surgery.

摘要

使用美国肩肘外科医师学会肩部(ASES)评分和康斯坦特-默里肩部(CMS)评分等功能评估方法,以及内旋和移位(IRO/Shift)试验和乔布试验等临床检查方法对术后患者进行调查至关重要。在本研究中,最初的87例患者中有51例接受了关节镜下冈上肌修复术(22例单排修复、16例双排修复、13例清创术)。在术前、术后3个月和6个月进行检查。两项评估均显示,所有87例患者随时间推移均有显著改善,但两组(有损伤/无损伤)之间无差异(>0.815),时间×组间也无差异(>0.895)。随着时间的推移,IRO/Shift试验在区分两组(阳性与阴性)的ASES和CMS评分方面显示出更强的能力,但乔布试验则不然(>0.100)。与ASES和IRO/Shift试验相比,修复术后CMS评分和乔布试验的改善程度较低。大多数患者在术后6个月恢复到足够的功能水平。与单排修复组和清创术组相比,双排修复患者恢复日常生活活动和临床检查阴性所需的时间更长。总之,功能评估和临床检查均显示术后有改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e64/10533080/7e93d42d466c/jpm-13-01304-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验