Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, 221006 Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Department of Orthopedics, Zaozhuang Mining Group Central Hospital, 277800 Zaozhuang, Shandong Province, China.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Jun;107(4):102828. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102828. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
There are few previous studies on traumatic supraspinatus tear with adhesive capsulitis. This study used arthroscopic release with single-row fixation or double-row suture bridge fixation to treat adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder with rotator cuff tears. Further, the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic release with single-row fixation and double-row suture bridge fixation was compared.
Arthroscopic release combined with single-row fixation or double-row suture bridge fixation showed good clinical outcomes in patients with traumatic supraspinatus tear with adhesive capsulitis.
A single-center prospective randomized trial was performed from June 2013 to June 2017. Of the 68 patients with traumatic supraspinatus tear and adhesive capsulitis who underwent arthroscopic release, 34 (22 with tear measuring≤3cm and 12 with tear measuring>3cm) were included in the single-row fixation group and 34 (20 with tear measuring≤3cm and 14 with tear measuring>3cm) were included in the double-row suture bridge fixation group. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder scores, range of motion, time to achieve satisfactory scores, and rotator cuff re-tear rate were compared between the groups.
The range of motion, VAS score, UCLA and ASES shoulder scores significantly improved after surgery in both groups. There was a significant difference in the UCLA and ASES shoulder scores, time to achieve satisfactory scores, and rotator cuff re-tear rates in patients with tears measuring>3cm between the groups.
Arthroscopic release combined with single-row fixation or double-row suture bridge fixation showed good clinical outcomes in patients with traumatic supraspinatus tear with adhesive capsulitis. Therefore, the capsule of the shoulder should be thoroughly released to achieve such outcomes. For patients with rotator cuff tears measuring>3cm, double-row suture bridge fixation was superior to single-row fixation and the rotator cuff re-tear rate was low.
I; prospective, randomized trial, treatment study.
既往关于创伤性冈上肌腱撕裂合并肩关节囊炎的研究较少。本研究采用关节镜下松解联合单排固定或双排缝合桥固定治疗伴有肩袖撕裂的粘连性肩关节囊炎,并对比分析关节镜下松解联合单排固定与双排缝合桥固定的临床疗效。
关节镜下松解联合单排固定或双排缝合桥固定治疗创伤性冈上肌腱撕裂合并肩关节囊炎可获得较好的临床效果。
采用单中心前瞻性随机对照研究,于 2013 年 6 月至 2017 年 6 月共纳入 68 例创伤性冈上肌腱撕裂合并肩关节囊炎患者,均接受关节镜下松解术治疗。根据冈上肌腱撕裂大小将患者分为两组:单排固定组(撕裂口长度≤3cm 22 例,撕裂口长度>3cm 12 例)和双排缝合桥固定组(撕裂口长度≤3cm 20 例,撕裂口长度>3cm 14 例)。比较两组患者的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)评分、美国肩肘外科医师协会(ASES)评分、肩关节活动度、达到满意评分所需时间和肩袖再撕裂率。
两组患者术后肩关节活动度、VAS 评分、UCLA 评分和 ASES 评分均明显改善,且撕裂口长度>3cm 患者的 UCLA 评分和 ASES 评分、达到满意评分所需时间和肩袖再撕裂率差异有统计学意义。
关节镜下松解联合单排固定或双排缝合桥固定治疗创伤性冈上肌腱撕裂合并肩关节囊炎可获得较好的临床效果,术中应彻底松解肩关节囊。对于撕裂口长度>3cm 的患者,双排缝合桥固定优于单排固定,且肩袖再撕裂率较低。
Ⅰ级;前瞻性随机对照试验,治疗性研究。