Shin Yonghoon, Won Yoonsun, Yang Taeil, Kim Joohan, Lee Joonpyo, Seo Jeongduk, Jang Albert Youngwoo, Kim Minsu, Oh Pyung Chun, Lee Kyounghoon, Kang Woong Chol, Han Seung Hwan, Suh Soon Yong
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Department of Cardiology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon 21565, Republic of Korea.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 12;59(9):1649. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091649.
: Polymer-free ultrathin strut sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents (PF-SES) are recognized as safe and effective in diverse patient populations, although the implications of post-dilation during stent implantation remain underexamined. : In this study, patients implanted with PF-SES at Gachon University Gil Medical Center between December 2014 and February 2018 were evaluated. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), encompassing nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death were identified as primary outcomes, with secondary outcomes including target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and in-stent restenosis (ISR). : Of the 384 initial patients, 299 were considered eligible for analysis. The groups, delineated by those undergoing post-dilation (143 patients) and those not (156 patients), exhibited comparable rates of primary outcomes [hazard ratio (HR), 2.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.40 to 11.87; = 0.37]. The outcomes remained consistent irrespective of the post-dilation status and were similarly unaffected in multivariate analyses (HR, 2.90; 95% CI, 0.52 to 16.34; = 0.227). : These results suggest that the clinical outcomes of patients with post-dilation were similar to that of those without post-dilation in those with the polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents.
无聚合物超薄支撑西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架(PF - SES)在不同患者群体中被认为是安全有效的,尽管支架植入过程中后扩张的影响仍未得到充分研究。在本研究中,对2014年12月至2018年2月期间在加川大学吉尔医学中心植入PF - SES的患者进行了评估。主要不良心血管事件(MACE),包括非致命性心肌梗死(MI)、非致命性中风和心血管死亡被确定为主要结局,次要结局包括靶血管重建(TVR)、靶病变重建(TLR)和支架内再狭窄(ISR)。在384例初始患者中,299例被认为符合分析条件。根据是否进行后扩张分为两组(后扩张组143例患者,未进行后扩张组156例患者),两组主要结局发生率相当[风险比(HR),2.17;95%置信区间(CI),0.40至11.87;P = 0.37]。无论后扩张状态如何,结局均保持一致,在多变量分析中同样未受影响(HR,2.90;95% CI,0.52至16.34;P = 0.227)。这些结果表明,在植入无聚合物西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架的患者中,进行后扩张患者的临床结局与未进行后扩张患者的临床结局相似。