Perletta Fabrizia, Di Pancrazio Chiara, Rodomonti Diamante, Di Febo Tiziana, Luciani Mirella, Krasteva Ivanka Marinova, Maggetti Marta, Profeta Francesca, Salini Romolo, De Massis Fabrizio, Sacchini Flavio, Tittarelli Manuela
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise, 64100 Teramo, Italy.
Microorganisms. 2023 Aug 26;11(9):2162. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11092162.
Canine brucellosis caused by , is an infectious disease affecting dogs and wild Canidae. Clinical diagnosis is challenging, and laboratory testing is crucial for a definitive diagnosis. Various serological methods have been described, but their accuracy is uncertain due to limited validation studies. The present study aimed to evaluate the performances of three serological tests for the diagnosis of in comparison with bacterial isolation (gold standard), in order to establish a protocol for the serological diagnosis of canine brucellosis. A panel of sera from naturally infected dogs ( = 61), from which was isolated, and uninfected dogs ( = 143), negative for isolation, were tested using microplate serum agglutination (mSAT), complement fixation performed using the antigen (-CFT), and a commercial immunofluorescence assay (IFAT). The sensitivity and specificity of the three serological methods were, respectively, the following: 96.7% (95% CI 88.8-98.7%) and 92.3 (95% CI 86.7-95.1%) for mSAT; 96.7% (95% CI 88.8-98.7%) and 96.5 (95% CI 92.1-98.2%) for -CFT; 98.4% (95% CI 91.3-99.4%) and 99.3 (95% CI 96.2-99.8%) for IFAT. The use in of the three methods in parallel, combined with bacterial isolation and molecular methods, could improve the diagnosis of the infection in dogs.
由[病原体名称未给出]引起的犬布鲁氏菌病是一种影响犬类和野生犬科动物的传染病。临床诊断具有挑战性,而实验室检测对于确诊至关重要。已经描述了各种血清学方法,但由于验证研究有限,其准确性尚不确定。本研究旨在评估三种血清学检测方法与细菌分离(金标准)相比在诊断[疾病名称未给出]方面的性能,以便建立犬布鲁氏菌病血清学诊断方案。使用微量板血清凝集试验(mSAT)、使用[抗原名称未给出]抗原进行的补体结合试验(-CFT)以及一种商业免疫荧光试验(IFAT),对一组来自自然感染犬(n = 61,从中分离出了[病原体名称未给出])和未感染犬(n = 143,[病原体名称未给出]分离阴性)的血清进行检测。三种血清学方法的敏感性和特异性分别如下:mSAT为96.7%(95%可信区间88.8 - 98.7%)和92.3(95%可信区间86.7 - 95.1%);-CFT为96.7%(95%可信区间88.8 - 98.7%)和96.5(95%可信区间92.1 - 98.2%);IFAT为98.4%(95%可信区间91.3 - 99.4%)和99.3(95%可信区间96.2 - 99.8%)。将这三种方法与细菌分离和分子方法并行使用,可提高犬感染的诊断水平。