Castellanos A, Portillo B, Zaman L, Luceri R M, Myerburg R J
Am J Cardiol. 1986 Nov 1;58(10):964-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(86)80020-0.
Linking is an electrophysiologic phenomenon in which each successive impulse entering a macroreentry circuit propagates preferentially along 1 limb because of the functional impedance to conduction in the contralateral limb produced by the previous impulse. Electrophysiologic studies were performed in 12 patients with a bidirectionally conducting accessory pathway. Linking was analyzed while 1:1 atrioventricular conduction took place through the normal pathway. When atrial pacing (at the same cycle length) could be initiated during sinus rhythm in patients with rapidly conducting accessory pathways, linking was dynamically maintained by repetitive local refractoriness (interference). When it could be initiated during the usual type of orthodromic circus movement tachycardia, linking was sustained by actual impulse collision, the underlying mechanism having also been called entrainment. When it could be initiated during sinus rhythm in a patient with a slowly conducting accessory pathway, linking was maintained by impulse collision, but the underlying mechanism could not be called entrainment because stimulation had not been started during tachycardia. This study showed that 2 terms--linking and entrainment--may be applied to the same mechanism and, conversely, that the same name could not be used in reference to the same mechanism when pacing was initiated under different circumstances. However, using the proposed conceptual formulation for linking, it is apparent that seemingly diverse mechanisms associated with macroreentry circuits involving accessory pathways are, in fact, variations on a common electrophysiologic theme.
联律是一种电生理现象,即进入大折返环路的每一个相继冲动,由于前一个冲动在对侧肢体产生的功能性传导阻抗,优先沿一个肢体传导。对12例具有双向传导旁路的患者进行了电生理研究。在通过正常途径发生1:1房室传导时对联律进行分析。对于具有快速传导旁路的患者,当在窦性心律期间可以启动心房起搏(在相同周期长度下)时,联律通过重复的局部不应期(干扰)动态维持。当在通常类型的顺向型房室折返性心动过速期间可以启动心房起搏时,联律通过实际的冲动碰撞得以维持,其潜在机制也被称为拖带。对于具有缓慢传导旁路的患者,当在窦性心律期间可以启动心房起搏时,联律通过冲动碰撞维持,但潜在机制不能称为拖带,因为在心动过速期间尚未开始刺激。这项研究表明,“联律”和“拖带”这两个术语可能适用于相同的机制,相反,当在不同情况下启动起搏时,不能用相同的名称来指代相同的机制。然而,使用所提出的联律概念表述,很明显,与涉及旁路的大折返环路相关的看似不同的机制,实际上是一个共同电生理主题的变体。