Suppr超能文献

50 岁及以上患有轻度胆石性胰腺炎人群中胆囊切除术的时间间隔及相关结局。

Time to interval cholecystectomy and associated outcomes in a population aged 50 and above with mild gallstone pancreatitis.

机构信息

Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Sep 28;408(1):380. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03098-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cholecystectomy on index admission for mild gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) is recommended, although not always feasible. This study examined rates and outcomes of people aged ≥ 50 years who underwent interval (delayed) cholecystectomy at increasing time points.

METHODS

Hospitalisation and death data were linked for individuals aged ≥ 50 years admitted to hospital in New South Wales, Australia with mild GSP between 2008-2018. Primary outcome was interval cholecystectomy timing. Secondary outcomes included mortality, emergency readmission for gallstone-related disease (GSRD) (28 and 180-day), and length of stay (LOS) (index admission and total six-month GSRD).

RESULTS

3,003 patients underwent interval cholecystectomy: 861 (28.6%) at 1-30, 1,221 (40.7%) at 31-90 and 921 (30.7%) at 91-365 days from index admission. There was no difference in 365-day mortality between groups. Longer delay to cholecystectomy was associated with increased 180-day emergency GSRD readmission (17.5% vs 15.8% vs 19.9%, p < 0.001) and total six-month LOS (5.9 vs 8.4 vs 8.3, p < 0.001). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was increasingly required with cholecystectomy delay (14.5% vs 16.9% vs 20.4%, p < 0.001), as were open cholecystectomy procedures (4.8% vs 7.6% vs 11.3%, p < 0.001). Extended delay was associated with patients of lower socioeconomic status, regional/rural backgrounds or who presented to a low volume or non-tertiary hospital (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Delay to interval cholecystectomy results in increased rates of emergency readmission, overall LOS, risks of conversion to open surgery and need for ERCP. Index admission cholecystectomy is still recommended, however when not possible, interval cholecystectomy should be performed within 30 days to minimise patient risk and healthcare burden.

摘要

背景

对于轻度胆石性胰腺炎(GSP)患者,建议在入院时行胆囊切除术,但并非总是可行。本研究调查了年龄≥50 岁的患者在不同时间点行间隔(延迟)胆囊切除术的比例和结局。

方法

对 2008 年至 2018 年在澳大利亚新南威尔士州因轻度 GSP 住院的年龄≥50 岁的患者进行了住院和死亡数据的链接。主要结局为间隔性胆囊切除术的时间。次要结局包括死亡率、因胆石相关疾病(GSRD)的急诊再入院(28 天和 180 天)和住院时间(指数入院和总 6 个月 GSRD)。

结果

3003 例患者行间隔性胆囊切除术:861 例(28.6%)在入院后 1-30 天,1221 例(40.7%)在入院后 31-90 天,921 例(30.7%)在入院后 91-365 天。三组患者 365 天死亡率无差异。胆囊切除术的延迟与 180 天急诊 GSRD 再入院率(17.5%比 15.8%比 19.9%,p<0.001)和总 6 个月 LOS(5.9 比 8.4 比 8.3,p<0.001)增加有关。随着胆囊切除术的延迟,需要行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的比例增加(14.5%比 16.9%比 20.4%,p<0.001),开放胆囊切除术的比例也增加(4.8%比 7.6%比 11.3%,p<0.001)。较长的延迟与社会经济地位较低、区域性/农村背景或就诊于低容量或非三级医院的患者有关(p<0.001)。

结论

间隔性胆囊切除术的延迟导致急诊再入院率、总 LOS、转为开放性手术的风险以及 ERCP 的需求增加。仍推荐入院时行胆囊切除术,但如果不可行,间隔性胆囊切除术应在 30 天内进行,以最大限度地降低患者风险和医疗负担。

相似文献

7
Effect of surgical timing on outcomes after cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis.
Surgery. 2023 Sep;174(3):660-665. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.05.009. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
8
Gallstone pancreatitis in older patients: Are we operating enough?
Surgery. 2011 Sep;150(3):515-25. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.072.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic and therapeutic management of severe acute pancreatitis. Evidence based medicine (EBM) clinical practice guidelines.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2025 Apr 9;20(1):1-29. doi: 10.20452/wiitm.2025.17941.

本文引用的文献

3
Index cholecystectomy rates in mild gallstone pancreatitis: a single-centre experience.
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Oct;90(10):2011-2014. doi: 10.1111/ans.15887. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
4
Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of early versus delayed cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis.
Br J Surg. 2019 Oct;106(11):1442-1451. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11221. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
5
Acute Biliary Pancreatitis is Associated With Adverse Outcomes in the Elderly: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug;53(7):e291-e297. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001108.
6
Initial Medical Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis: American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review.
Gastroenterology. 2018 Mar;154(4):1103-1139. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.031. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
7
Is the acute surgical unit model feasible for Australian regional centres?
ANZ J Surg. 2016 Nov;86(11):889-893. doi: 10.1111/ans.13724. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
9
Acute pancreatitis: update on management.
Med J Aust. 2015 May 4;202(8):420-3. doi: 10.5694/mja14.01333.
10
The ICD-10 Charlson Comorbidity Index predicted mortality but not resource utilization following hip fracture.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;68(1):44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验