Suppr超能文献

在内镜下括约肌切开术和分期胆囊切除术是重症急性胆石性胰腺炎(GSP)初始胆囊切除术的合理替代方案。

Endoscopic sphincterotomy and interval cholecystectomy are reasonable alternatives to index cholecystectomy in severe acute gallstone pancreatitis (GSP).

作者信息

Sanjay Pandanaboyana, Yeeting Sim, Whigham Carole, Judson Hannah, Polignano Francesco M, Tait Iain S

机构信息

Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, DD2 9SY, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2008 Aug;22(8):1832-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9710-1. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

UK guidelines for gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) advocate definitive treatment during the index admission, or within 2 weeks of discharge. However, this target may not always be achievable. This study reviewed current management of GSP in a university hospital and evaluated the risk associated with interval cholecystectomy.

METHODS

All patients that presented with GSP over a 4-year period (2002-2005) were stratified for disease severity (APACHE II). Patient demographics, time to definitive therapy [index cholecystectomy; endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES); Interval cholecystectomy], and readmission rates were analysed retrospectively.

RESULTS

100 patients admitted with GSP. Disease severity was mild in 54 patients and severe in 46 patients. Twenty-two patients unsuitable for surgery underwent ES as definitive treatment with no readmissions. Seventy-eight patients underwent cholecystectomy, of which 40 (58%) had an index cholecystectomy, and 38 (42%) an interval cholecystectomy. Only 10 patients with severe GSP had an index cholecystectomy, whilst 30 were readmitted for Interval cholecystectomy (p = 0.04). The median APACHE score was 4 [standard deviation (SD) 3.8] for index cholecystectomy and 8 (SD 2.6) for Interval cholecystectomy (p < 0.05). Median time (range) to surgery was 7.5 (2-30) days for index cholecystectomy and 63 (13-210) days for Interval cholecystectomy. Fifty percent (19/38) of patients with GSP had ES prior to discharge for interval cholecystectomy. Two (5%) patients were readmitted: with acute cholecystitis (n = 1) and acute pancreatitis (n = 1) , whilst awaiting interval cholecystectomy. No mortality was noted in the Index or Interval group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that overall 62% (22 endoscopic sphincterotomy and 40 index cholecystectomy) of patients with GSP have definitive therapy during the Index admission. However, surgery was deferred in the majority (n = 30) of patients with severe GSP, and 19/30 underwent ES prior to discharge. ES and interval cholecystectomy in severe GSP is associated with minimal morbidity and readmission rates, and is considered a reasonable alternative to an index cholecystectomy in patients with severe GSP.

摘要

背景

英国胆石性胰腺炎(GSP)指南提倡在初次住院期间或出院后2周内进行确定性治疗。然而,这一目标并非总能实现。本研究回顾了一所大学医院目前对GSP的治疗情况,并评估了延期胆囊切除术相关的风险。

方法

对4年期间(2002 - 2005年)所有出现GSP的患者按疾病严重程度(急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II [APACHE II])进行分层。回顾性分析患者的人口统计学资料、至确定性治疗的时间[初次胆囊切除术;内镜括约肌切开术(ES);延期胆囊切除术]以及再入院率。

结果

100例因GSP入院的患者。54例患者病情轻度,46例患者病情严重。22例不适合手术的患者接受ES作为确定性治疗,无再入院情况。78例患者接受了胆囊切除术,其中40例(58%)进行了初次胆囊切除术,38例(42%)进行了延期胆囊切除术。只有10例重症GSP患者进行了初次胆囊切除术,而30例因延期胆囊切除术再次入院(p = 0.04)。初次胆囊切除术的APACHE评分中位数为4 [标准差(SD)3.8],延期胆囊切除术的APACHE评分中位数为8(SD 2.6)(p < 0.05)。初次胆囊切除术至手术的中位时间(范围)为7.5(2 - 30)天,延期胆囊切除术为63(13 - 210)天。50%(19/38)的GSP患者在出院前接受ES以进行延期胆囊切除术。2例(5%)患者再次入院:1例因急性胆囊炎,1例因急性胰腺炎,均在等待延期胆囊切除术期间。初次或延期组均未观察到死亡病例。

结论

本研究表明,总体而言,62%(22例内镜括约肌切开术和40例初次胆囊切除术)的GSP患者在初次住院期间接受了确定性治疗。然而,大多数(n = 30)重症GSP患者的手术被推迟,其中19/30例在出院前接受了ES。重症GSP患者行ES和延期胆囊切除术的发病率和再入院率极低,被认为是重症GSP患者初次胆囊切除术的合理替代方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验