Sanjay Pandanaboyana, Yeeting Sim, Whigham Carole, Judson Hannah, Polignano Francesco M, Tait Iain S
Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, DD2 9SY, Scotland, UK.
Surg Endosc. 2008 Aug;22(8):1832-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9710-1. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
UK guidelines for gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) advocate definitive treatment during the index admission, or within 2 weeks of discharge. However, this target may not always be achievable. This study reviewed current management of GSP in a university hospital and evaluated the risk associated with interval cholecystectomy.
All patients that presented with GSP over a 4-year period (2002-2005) were stratified for disease severity (APACHE II). Patient demographics, time to definitive therapy [index cholecystectomy; endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES); Interval cholecystectomy], and readmission rates were analysed retrospectively.
100 patients admitted with GSP. Disease severity was mild in 54 patients and severe in 46 patients. Twenty-two patients unsuitable for surgery underwent ES as definitive treatment with no readmissions. Seventy-eight patients underwent cholecystectomy, of which 40 (58%) had an index cholecystectomy, and 38 (42%) an interval cholecystectomy. Only 10 patients with severe GSP had an index cholecystectomy, whilst 30 were readmitted for Interval cholecystectomy (p = 0.04). The median APACHE score was 4 [standard deviation (SD) 3.8] for index cholecystectomy and 8 (SD 2.6) for Interval cholecystectomy (p < 0.05). Median time (range) to surgery was 7.5 (2-30) days for index cholecystectomy and 63 (13-210) days for Interval cholecystectomy. Fifty percent (19/38) of patients with GSP had ES prior to discharge for interval cholecystectomy. Two (5%) patients were readmitted: with acute cholecystitis (n = 1) and acute pancreatitis (n = 1) , whilst awaiting interval cholecystectomy. No mortality was noted in the Index or Interval group.
This study demonstrates that overall 62% (22 endoscopic sphincterotomy and 40 index cholecystectomy) of patients with GSP have definitive therapy during the Index admission. However, surgery was deferred in the majority (n = 30) of patients with severe GSP, and 19/30 underwent ES prior to discharge. ES and interval cholecystectomy in severe GSP is associated with minimal morbidity and readmission rates, and is considered a reasonable alternative to an index cholecystectomy in patients with severe GSP.
英国胆石性胰腺炎(GSP)指南提倡在初次住院期间或出院后2周内进行确定性治疗。然而,这一目标并非总能实现。本研究回顾了一所大学医院目前对GSP的治疗情况,并评估了延期胆囊切除术相关的风险。
对4年期间(2002 - 2005年)所有出现GSP的患者按疾病严重程度(急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II [APACHE II])进行分层。回顾性分析患者的人口统计学资料、至确定性治疗的时间[初次胆囊切除术;内镜括约肌切开术(ES);延期胆囊切除术]以及再入院率。
100例因GSP入院的患者。54例患者病情轻度,46例患者病情严重。22例不适合手术的患者接受ES作为确定性治疗,无再入院情况。78例患者接受了胆囊切除术,其中40例(58%)进行了初次胆囊切除术,38例(42%)进行了延期胆囊切除术。只有10例重症GSP患者进行了初次胆囊切除术,而30例因延期胆囊切除术再次入院(p = 0.04)。初次胆囊切除术的APACHE评分中位数为4 [标准差(SD)3.8],延期胆囊切除术的APACHE评分中位数为8(SD 2.6)(p < 0.05)。初次胆囊切除术至手术的中位时间(范围)为7.5(2 - 30)天,延期胆囊切除术为63(13 - 210)天。50%(19/38)的GSP患者在出院前接受ES以进行延期胆囊切除术。2例(5%)患者再次入院:1例因急性胆囊炎,1例因急性胰腺炎,均在等待延期胆囊切除术期间。初次或延期组均未观察到死亡病例。
本研究表明,总体而言,62%(22例内镜括约肌切开术和40例初次胆囊切除术)的GSP患者在初次住院期间接受了确定性治疗。然而,大多数(n = 30)重症GSP患者的手术被推迟,其中19/30例在出院前接受了ES。重症GSP患者行ES和延期胆囊切除术的发病率和再入院率极低,被认为是重症GSP患者初次胆囊切除术的合理替代方案。