Department of Food, Nutrition and Dietetics, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Psychology, Counselling, and Therapy, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Dec;35(12):e14684. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14684. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based dietary management approaches for symptoms of dyspepsia are lacking. This study aimed to compare dietary factors, symptoms, quality of life (QOL) and salivary cortisol in dyspepsia participants and healthy controls. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was completed by adults with dyspepsia (n = 121) meeting Rome IV criteria and healthy controls (n = 52). Outcome measures included self-reported questionnaires about dietary habits, triggers, restrictions, dietary management approaches, nutritional intake, psychological variables, QOL, gastrointestinal symptoms, and optional cortisol awakening response (CAR) via saliva samples. Data were analyzed using Chi-square or Mann-Whitney U. Cortisol awakening response data was analyzed using moderated regression controlling for age, gender and distress. KEY RESULTS: Fermentable carbohydrates (FODMAPs) (55%) were the most reported trigger in adults with dyspepsia. The dyspepsia group (88%) followed special diets more than controls (47%; p < 0.001), with a low FODMAP diet being most common (69%). The dyspepsia group consumed less fiber (p = 0.014), calcium (p = 0.015), and total FODMAPs (p < 0.001) than controls. There was a greater prevalence of comorbid anxiety (41%) and depression (31%) in dyspepsia compared to controls (15% and 12%, respectively, p < 0.001 and p = 0.006). The dyspepsia group had poorer QOL and greater gastrointestinal symptom severity than controls (p < 0.001). There was a negative association between anxiety and CAR (p = 0.001) in dyspepsia but not in controls. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Adults with dyspepsia follow special diets more than controls and perceive FODMAPs as a key dietary trigger. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring nutritional adequacy and QOL, and emphasize mechanisms of depleted stress response in dyspepsia, warranting further exploration.
背景:目前缺乏针对消化不良症状的循证饮食管理方法。本研究旨在比较消化不良患者和健康对照者的饮食因素、症状、生活质量(QOL)和唾液皮质醇。
方法:采用罗马 IV 标准诊断的消化不良患者(n=121)和健康对照者(n=52)完成横断面调查。结局指标包括饮食习惯、诱因、限制、饮食管理方法、营养摄入、心理变量、QOL、胃肠道症状以及可选唾液皮质醇觉醒反应(CAR)的自我报告问卷。采用卡方检验或曼-惠特尼 U 检验分析数据。采用调节回归分析控制年龄、性别和痛苦程度分析皮质醇觉醒反应数据。
主要结果:可发酵碳水化合物(FODMAPs)(55%)是消化不良患者最常报告的诱因。消化不良组(88%)比对照组(47%;p<0.001)更常遵循特殊饮食,其中低 FODMAP 饮食最常见(69%)。消化不良组的膳食纤维(p=0.014)、钙(p=0.015)和总 FODMAPs(p<0.001)摄入均低于对照组。与对照组相比,消化不良组的共病焦虑症(41%)和抑郁症(31%)更为常见(分别为 15%和 12%,p<0.001 和 p=0.006)。消化不良组的 QOL 较差,胃肠道症状严重程度大于对照组(p<0.001)。消化不良患者的焦虑与 CAR 呈负相关(p=0.001),但对照组无此关联。
结论:与对照组相比,消化不良患者更常遵循特殊饮食,认为 FODMAPs 是关键饮食诱因。这些发现强调了监测营养充足性和 QOL 的重要性,并强调了消化不良中应激反应枯竭的机制,值得进一步探讨。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023-12
World J Gastroenterol. 2014-12-14
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2020-12-25