• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项β-内酰胺类过敏评估方案的分析,该方案对由抗菌药物管理计划处理的各种报告过敏情况提出了挑战。

Analysis of a beta-lactam allergy assessment protocol challenging diverse reported allergies managed by an antimicrobial stewardship program.

作者信息

Jacobs Max W, Bremmer Derek N, Shively Nathan R, Moffa Matthew A, Trienski Tamara L, Carr Dustin R, Buchanan Carley A, Walsh Thomas L

机构信息

Medicine Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Department of Pharmacy, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Sep 8;3(1):e153. doi: 10.1017/ash.2023.432. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1017/ash.2023.432
PMID:37771740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10523545/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and efficacy of a novel beta-lactam allergy assessment algorithm managed by an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) team.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

One quaternary referral teaching hospital and one tertiary care teaching hospital in a large western Pennsylvania health network.

PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS

Patients who received a beta-lactam challenge dose under the beta-lactam allergy assessment algorithm.

INTERVENTIONS

A beta-lactam allergy assessment protocol was designed and implemented by an ASP team. The protocol risk stratified patients' reported allergies to identify patients appropriate for a challenge with a beta-lactam antibiotic. This retrospective analysis assessed the safety and efficacy of this protocol among patients receiving a challenge dose from November 2017 to July 2021.

RESULTS

Over a 45-month period, 119 total patients with either penicillin or cephalosporin allergies entered the protocol. Following a challenge dose, 106 (89.1%) patients were treated with a beta-lactam. Eleven patients had adverse reactions to a challenge dose, one of which required escalation of care to the intensive care unit. Of the patients with an unknown or low-risk reported allergy, 7/66 (10.6%) had an observed adverse reaction compared to 3/42 (7.1%) who had an observed reaction with a reported high-risk or anaphylactic allergy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our implemented protocol was safe and effective, with over 90% of patients tolerating the challenge without incident and many going on to receive indicated beta-lactam therapy. This protocol may serve as a framework for other inpatient ASP teams to implement a low-barrier allergy assessment led by ASP teams.

摘要

目的

评估由抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)团队管理的新型β-内酰胺类过敏评估算法的安全性和有效性。

设计

回顾性分析。

地点

宾夕法尼亚州西部一个大型医疗网络中的一家四级转诊教学医院和一家三级护理教学医院。

患者或参与者

在β-内酰胺类过敏评估算法下接受β-内酰胺类激发剂量的患者。

干预措施

ASP团队设计并实施了一项β-内酰胺类过敏评估方案。该方案根据风险对患者报告的过敏情况进行分层,以确定适合接受β-内酰胺类抗生素激发试验的患者。这项回顾性分析评估了2017年11月至2021年7月期间接受激发剂量的患者中该方案的安全性和有效性。

结果

在45个月的时间里,共有119例对青霉素或头孢菌素过敏的患者进入该方案。给予激发剂量后,106例(89.1%)患者接受了β-内酰胺类治疗。11例患者对激发剂量有不良反应,其中1例需要升级到重症监护病房进行治疗。在报告的过敏情况未知或低风险的患者中,7/66(10.6%)观察到有不良反应,而在报告的高风险或过敏性过敏患者中,3/42(7.1%)观察到有不良反应。

结论

我们实施的方案是安全有效的,超过90%的患者耐受激发试验且无不良事件发生,许多患者随后接受了指定的β-内酰胺类治疗。该方案可为其他住院ASP团队实施由ASP团队主导的低门槛过敏评估提供框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13da/10523545/463e8ee24255/S2732494X23004321_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13da/10523545/855836c6d874/S2732494X23004321_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13da/10523545/8f0b02bee11b/S2732494X23004321_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13da/10523545/061431c82811/S2732494X23004321_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13da/10523545/463e8ee24255/S2732494X23004321_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13da/10523545/855836c6d874/S2732494X23004321_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13da/10523545/8f0b02bee11b/S2732494X23004321_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13da/10523545/061431c82811/S2732494X23004321_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13da/10523545/463e8ee24255/S2732494X23004321_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of a beta-lactam allergy assessment protocol challenging diverse reported allergies managed by an antimicrobial stewardship program.一项β-内酰胺类过敏评估方案的分析,该方案对由抗菌药物管理计划处理的各种报告过敏情况提出了挑战。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Sep 8;3(1):e153. doi: 10.1017/ash.2023.432. eCollection 2023.
2
Use of a beta-lactam graded challenge process for inpatients with self-reported penicillin allergies at an academic medical center.在一家学术医疗中心,对自我报告有青霉素过敏史的住院患者采用β-内酰胺分级激发流程。
Front Allergy. 2023 Jul 31;4:1161683. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2023.1161683. eCollection 2023.
3
Full-dose challenge of moderate, severe, and unknown beta-lactam allergies in the emergency department.在急诊科对中度、重度和未知β-内酰胺类过敏进行全剂量挑战。
Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;31(8):777-781. doi: 10.1111/acem.14893. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
4
The Penicillin Allergy Delabeling Program: A Multicenter Whole-of-Hospital Health Services Intervention and Comparative Effectiveness Study.青霉素过敏标签去除计划:一项多中心全院卫生服务干预和比较效果研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 2;73(3):487-496. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa653.
5
Outcomes from an inpatient beta-lactam allergy guideline across a large US health system.美国大型医疗体系中住院患者β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏指南的结果。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 May;40(5):528-535. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.50. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
6
Improving Antibiotic Stewardship for Inpatients with Reported Beta-Lactam Allergies and Limited Access to Penicillin Skin Testing.改善报告有β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏且无法进行青霉素皮试的住院患者的抗生素管理。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2022 Mar;48(3):147-153. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.12.001. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
7
Evaluation and Management of Penicillin Allergy: A Review.青霉素过敏的评估与管理:综述
JAMA. 2019 Jan 15;321(2):188-199. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19283.
8
Drug Allergy Delabeling Programs: Recent Strategies and Targeted Populations.药物过敏标签外使用计划:最新策略和目标人群。
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2022 Jun;62(3):484-504. doi: 10.1007/s12016-021-08913-x. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
9
Utility of beta-lactam allergy assessment in patients receiving vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis.对接受万古霉素进行外科手术预防的患者进行β-内酰胺类过敏评估的效用。
Surg Pract Sci. 2024 Mar;16:100232. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100232. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
10
Improving inpatient paediatric de-labelling of allergies to beta-lactams: a quality improvement study.改善住院儿童β-内酰胺类过敏的去标签化:一项质量改进研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2024 Dec 13;110(1):26-30. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326533.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-reported beta-lactam allergy, mislabeling and inappropriate antibiotic use: a study from South India.自我报告的β-内酰胺类过敏、标签错误及不适当的抗生素使用:一项来自印度南部的研究。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 30;5(1):e145. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.10049. eCollection 2025.
2
Management and Implications of Beta-Lactam Allergies.β-内酰胺类过敏的管理及影响
Cureus. 2024 May 14;16(5):e60281. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60281. eCollection 2024 May.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of interventions that support penicillin allergy assessment and delabeling of adult and pediatric patients by nonallergy specialists: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非过敏专科医生支持青霉素过敏评估和重新标记成人和儿科患者的干预措施的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Infect Dis. 2023 Apr;129:152-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.11.026. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
2
Drug allergy: A 2022 practice parameter update.药物过敏:2022年实践参数更新
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Dec;150(6):1333-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.08.028. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
3
Establishing Amoxicillin Allergy in Children Through Direct Graded Oral Challenge (GOC): Evaluating Risk Factors for Positive Challenges, Safety, and Risk of Cross-Reactivity to Cephalosporines.
通过直接分级口服激发试验(GOC)确立儿童对阿莫西林的过敏反应:评估阳性激发试验的风险因素、安全性以及与头孢菌素交叉反应的风险。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Nov;9(11):4060-4066. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.06.057. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
4
Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: A Multidisciplinary Opportunity.青霉素过敏标签修正:一个多学科的机会。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Oct;8(9):2858-2868.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.04.059.
5
The Penicillin Allergy Delabeling Program: A Multicenter Whole-of-Hospital Health Services Intervention and Comparative Effectiveness Study.青霉素过敏标签去除计划:一项多中心全院卫生服务干预和比较效果研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 2;73(3):487-496. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa653.
6
Development and Validation of a Penicillin Allergy Clinical Decision Rule.开发和验证青霉素过敏临床决策规则。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):745-752. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0403.
7
Penicillin Allergy Skin Testing in the Inpatient Setting.住院环境中的青霉素过敏皮肤试验
Pharmacy (Basel). 2019 Aug 27;7(3):120. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7030120.
8
Comparing Direct Challenge to Penicillin Skin Testing for the Outpatient Evaluation of Penicillin Allergy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.直接挑战与青霉素皮试用于门诊青霉素过敏评估的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Sep-Oct;7(7):2163-2170. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.05.037. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
9
The challenge of de-labeling penicillin allergy.消除青霉素过敏标签的挑战。
Allergy. 2020 Feb;75(2):273-288. doi: 10.1111/all.13848. Epub 2019 May 26.
10
Evaluation and Management of Penicillin Allergy: A Review.青霉素过敏的评估与管理:综述
JAMA. 2019 Jan 15;321(2):188-199. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19283.