Suppr超能文献

自膨式金属支架治疗不可切除食管癌患者的疗效与安全性:一项真实世界研究

Efficacy and safety of self-expanding metal stents in patients with inoperable esophageal cancer: a real-life study.

作者信息

Jiménez-Gutiérrez José Miguel, Alonso-Lárraga Juan Octavio, Hernández-Guerrero Angélica I, Lino-Silva Leonardo Saul, Olivas-Martinez Antonio

机构信息

Department of Endoscopy, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, San Fernando 22, Tlalpan, Ciudad de México 14080, México.

Department of Endoscopy, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Ciudad de México, México.

出版信息

Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Sep 26;16:26317745231200975. doi: 10.1177/26317745231200975. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia is the most frequent symptom in patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are the current palliative treatment of choice for dysphagia in patients with non-curable esophageal cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of different types of SEMS for palliation of dysphagia.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced esophageal cancer and SEMS placement for dysphagia palliation in a tertiary care center. The primary outcome was the clinical success defined as an improvement in dysphagia (reduction of at least 2 points in the Mellow-Pinkas scoring system for dysphagia) after SEMS placement.

RESULTS

Between January 1999 and May 2020, 295 patients with esophageal cancer were identified. Among them, 75 had a SEMS placement for dysphagia palliation. The mean age of the patients was 61.3 years (standard deviation: 13.4), 69 patients (92%) were men, and the mean Mellow-Pinkas scoring for dysphagia pre- and post-SEMS placement were 3.1 and 1.4 (change from baseline -1.7), respectively. Technical success and clinical success were achieved in 98.6% and 58.9%, respectively. AEs were identified in 35/75 patients (46.7%), and SEMS migration was the most frequent AE in 22/75 patients (29.3%). There were no significant differences in improvement in dysphagia ( = 0.054), weight changes ( = 0.78), and AE ( = 0.73) among fully covered SEMS (fc-SEMS) and partially covered SEMS (pc-SEMS). The median follow-up was 89 days (interquartile range: 29-221).

CONCLUSION

SEMS placement was associated with a rapid improvement in dysphagia, high technical success, and a modest improvement in dysphagia with no major AE among fc-SEMS and pc-SEMS.

摘要

背景

吞咽困难是食管癌患者最常见的症状。自膨式金属支架(SEMS)是目前无法治愈的食管癌患者吞咽困难的姑息治疗首选方法。本研究旨在评估不同类型的SEMS缓解吞咽困难的疗效和不良事件(AE)。

方法

我们在一家三级医疗中心对晚期食管癌患者及为缓解吞咽困难而放置SEMS的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。主要结局是临床成功,定义为放置SEMS后吞咽困难改善(吞咽困难的Mellow-Pinkas评分系统至少降低2分)。

结果

1999年1月至2020年5月期间,共确定295例食管癌患者。其中,75例因吞咽困难缓解而放置了SEMS。患者的平均年龄为61.3岁(标准差:13.4),69例(92%)为男性,放置SEMS前后吞咽困难的平均Mellow-Pinkas评分分别为3.1和1.4(较基线变化-1.7)。技术成功率和临床成功率分别为98.6%和58.9%。75例患者中有35例(46.7%)出现AE,22例(29.3%)患者中SEMS移位是最常见的AE。全覆膜SEMS(fc-SEMS)和部分覆膜SEMS(pc-SEMS)在吞咽困难改善(P = 0.054)、体重变化(P = 0.78)和AE(P = 0.73)方面无显著差异。中位随访时间为89天(四分位间距:29 - 221)。

结论

放置SEMS与吞咽困难迅速改善、高技术成功率相关,且fc-SEMS和pc-SEMS在吞咽困难方面有适度改善,无重大AE。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6f/10524049/438c5fc58cfa/10.1177_26317745231200975-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验