• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适应性图式问卷的编制与验证

Development and Validation of the Adaptive Schema Questionnaire.

作者信息

Jain Anjali, Singh Kamlesh

机构信息

Dept. of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Psychol Med. 2023 Sep;45(5):476-485. doi: 10.1177/02537176221105146. Epub 2022 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1177/02537176221105146
PMID:37772145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10523517/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Schemas help with the organization and interpretation of information. Adaptive schemas indicate positive predisposing thinking patterns in an individual. This study aimed to develop a psychometrically robust tool to assess adaptive schema in a nonclinical sample.

METHOD

This research comprises two independent studies. Study I was multiphased. In Phase I ( = 70), 36 open-ended items were generated following the Young schema therapy model and qualitatively analyzed. This facilitated the generation of 144 items in Phase II ( = 152) which were evaluated for content validity and subjected to rigorous item analysis. Exploratory factor analysis was performed in Phase III ( = 751). Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted in Study II ( = 244).

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis resulted in a six-factor solution comprising 25 items. These factors correspond to the six adaptive themes, namely, adequate, secured, self-reliant/autonomous, resistant, successful, and self-assured. The newly developed Adaptive Schema Questionnaire demonstrated adequate reliability (α = 0.86). Significant correlations between the obtained factors and Early Maladaptive Schemas, depression, big five personality factors, and positive and negative effects established the concurrent validity. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated acceptable goodness of fit for the obtained model.

CONCLUSION

The developed Adaptive Schema Questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument with promising utility in psychotherapy and research context.

摘要

背景

图式有助于信息的组织和解释。适应性图式表明个体存在积极的易感性思维模式。本研究旨在开发一种心理测量稳健的工具,以评估非临床样本中的适应性图式。

方法

本研究包括两项独立研究。研究I分多个阶段进行。在第一阶段(n = 70),按照杨式图式疗法模型生成了36个开放式项目并进行了定性分析。这有助于在第二阶段(n = 152)生成144个项目,对这些项目进行内容效度评估并进行严格的项目分析。在第三阶段(n = 751)进行探索性因素分析。在研究II(n = 244)中进行验证性因素分析。

结果

探索性因素分析得出了一个包含25个项目的六因素解决方案。这些因素对应于六个适应性主题,即充足、安全、自力更生/自主、有抵抗力、成功和自信。新开发的适应性图式问卷显示出足够的信度(α = 0.86)。所获得的因素与早期适应不良图式、抑郁、大五人格因素以及正负效应之间的显著相关性确立了同时效度。验证性因素分析表明所获得的模型具有可接受的拟合优度。

结论

所开发的适应性图式问卷是一种可靠且有效的工具,在心理治疗和研究背景下具有广阔的应用前景。

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of the Adaptive Schema Questionnaire.适应性图式问卷的编制与验证
Indian J Psychol Med. 2023 Sep;45(5):476-485. doi: 10.1177/02537176221105146. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
2
Psychometric Properties and Normative values of Early Maladaptive Schema Questionnaires Set for Children and Adolescents (SQS).儿童和青少年早期适应不良图式问卷集(SQS)的心理测量特性及常模值
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Mar;24(2):534-554. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2049. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
3
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form-3 in Medical Students.韩国青年图式问卷简表-3在医学生中的信效度研究
Psychiatry Investig. 2015 Jul;12(3):295-304. doi: 10.4306/pi.2015.12.3.295. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
4
The Dusseldorf Illustrated Schema Questionnaire for Children (DISC).杜塞尔多夫儿童图解式问卷(DISC)。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2018 Feb 20;31(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41155-018-0087-y.
5
Positive clinical psychology and Schema Therapy (ST): The development of the Young Positive Schema Questionnaire (YPSQ) to complement the Young Schema Questionnaire 3 Short Form (YSQ-S3).积极临床心理学和图式治疗(ST):Young Positive Schema Questionnaire(YPSQ)的发展,以补充 Young Schema Questionnaire 3 Short Form(YSQ-S3)。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Sep;30(9):1199-1213. doi: 10.1037/pas0000567. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
6
Validation of a Brief Internet-Based Self-Report Measure of Maladaptive Personality and Interpersonal Schema: Confirmatory Factor Analysis.一种基于互联网的简短的适应不良人格和人际图式自我报告测量方法的验证:验证性因素分析
Interact J Med Res. 2023 Sep 29;12:e48425. doi: 10.2196/48425.
7
Validation of the greek version of the Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form 3: Internal consistency reliability and validity.《青少年图式问卷简表3》希腊语版本的验证:内部一致性信度和效度
Psychiatriki. 2018 Jul-Sep;29(3):220-230. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2018.293.220.
8
Development and Validation of the Positive Parenting Schema Inventory (PPSI) to Complement the Young Parenting Inventory (YPI) for Schema Therapy (ST).积极养育图式量表(PPSI)的编制与验证,以补充用于图式疗法(ST)的青少年养育量表(YPI)。
Assessment. 2020 Jun;27(4):766-786. doi: 10.1177/1073191118798464. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
9
Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Young Positive Schema Questionnaire.中文版《青年积极图式问卷》的效度与信度
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 2;13:1048954. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1048954. eCollection 2022.
10
Validation of the Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form in a Flemish Community Sample.佛兰芒社区样本中青少年图式问卷简版的验证
Psychol Belg. 2018 Apr 23;58(1):34-50. doi: 10.5334/pb.406.

本文引用的文献

1
Positive clinical psychology and Schema Therapy (ST): The development of the Young Positive Schema Questionnaire (YPSQ) to complement the Young Schema Questionnaire 3 Short Form (YSQ-S3).积极临床心理学和图式治疗(ST):Young Positive Schema Questionnaire(YPSQ)的发展,以补充 Young Schema Questionnaire 3 Short Form(YSQ-S3)。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Sep;30(9):1199-1213. doi: 10.1037/pas0000567. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
2
A Study Of A Measure Of Sampling Adequacy For Factor-Analytic Correlation Matrices.因子分析相关矩阵抽样充足性度量的研究
Multivariate Behav Res. 1977 Jan 1;12(1):43-7. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1201_3.
3
Psychotherapy of borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍的心理治疗
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 Nov;120(5):373-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01448.x.
4
The absence of positive psychological (eudemonic) well-being as a risk factor for depression: a ten year cohort study.积极心理(幸福)缺失作为抑郁的风险因素:一项十年队列研究。
J Affect Disord. 2010 May;122(3):213-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.032. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
5
[The mediating role of the interpersonal schemas between parenting styles and psychological symptoms: a schema focused view].[人际图式在教养方式与心理症状之间的中介作用:基于图式的视角]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2009 Summer;20(2):144-52.
6
Childhood emotional maltreatment and later psychological distress among college students: the mediating role of maladaptive schemas.童年期情感虐待与大学生后期心理困扰:适应不良图式的中介作用
Child Abuse Negl. 2009 Jan;33(1):59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.12.007. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
7
Out-patient psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: cost-effectiveness of schema-focused therapy v. transference-focused psychotherapy.边缘型人格障碍的门诊心理治疗:图式聚焦疗法与移情聚焦心理治疗的成本效益比较
Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Jun;192(6):450-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.033597.
8
Factor structure and internal consistency of the Young Schema Questionnaire (Short Form) in Korean and Australian samples.韩国和澳大利亚样本中青少年图式问卷(简版)的因子结构与内部一致性
J Affect Disord. 2006 Jul;93(1-3):133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 May 2.
9
Stability and discriminative power of the Young Schema-Questionnaire in a Dutch clinical versus non-clinical population.青少年图式问卷在荷兰临床与非临床人群中的稳定性及区分能力
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;36(2):129-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2004.08.005.
10
Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.结构方程分析报告的原则与实践
Psychol Methods. 2002 Mar;7(1):64-82. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.64.