Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas, USA.
Am J Hematol. 2024 Jan;99(1):21-27. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27113. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
The World Health Organization (WHO) classification system categorizes advanced systemic mastocytosis (SM-Adv) into aggressive SM (ASM), mast cell leukemia (MCL), and SM with associated hematological neoplasm (SM-AHN). By contrast, the International Consensus Classification (ICC) requires "immature" MC cytomorphology for the diagnosis of MCL and limits SM-AHN to myeloid neoplasms (SM-AMN). The current study includes 329 patients with SM-Adv (median age 65 years, range 18-88; males 58%): WHO subcategories SM-AHN (N = 212; 64%), ASM (N = 99; 30%), and MCL (N = 18; 6%); ICC subcategories SM-AMN (N = 190; 64%), ASM (N = 99; 33%), and MCL (N = 9; 3%); WHO-defined MCL with "mature" MC cytomorphology and SM-AHN associated with lymphoid neoplasms were operationally labeled as "MCL-mature" (N = 9) and SM-ALN (N = 22), respectively, and distinguished from ICC-defined MCL and SM-AMN. Multivariable analysis that included the Mayo alliance risk factors for survival in SM (age >60 years, anemia, thrombocytopenia, increased alkaline phosphatase) revealed more accurate survival prediction with the ICC versus WHO classification order: (i) survival was significantly worse with MCL-immature versus MCL-mature (hazard ratio [HR] 15; p < .01), (ii) prognostic distinction between MCL and SM-AHN/AMN was confirmed in the context of ICC (HR 9.3; p < .01) but not WHO classification order (p = .99), (iii) survival was similar between MCL-mature and SM-AMN (p = .18), and (iv) SM-AMN (HR 1.7; p < .01) but not SM-ALN (p = .37) was prognostically distinct from ASM. The current study provides evidence for the independent prognostic contribution of both the ICC system for SM-Adv and the Mayo alliance risk factors for survival in SM.
世界卫生组织(WHO)分类系统将晚期系统性肥大细胞增多症(SM-Adv)分为侵袭性 SM(ASM)、肥大细胞白血病(MCL)和伴发血液肿瘤的 SM(SM-AHN)。相比之下,国际共识分类(ICC)要求 MCL 诊断中存在“不成熟”的 MC 细胞形态,并将 SM-AHN 限制为髓系肿瘤(SM-AMN)。本研究纳入了 329 例 SM-Adv 患者(中位年龄 65 岁,范围 18-88;男性占 58%):WHO 亚类 SM-AHN(N=212;64%)、ASM(N=99;30%)和 MCL(N=18;6%);ICC 亚类 SM-AMN(N=190;64%)、ASM(N=99;33%)和 MCL(N=9;3%);WHO 定义的伴有“成熟”MC 形态的 MCL 和伴发淋巴肿瘤的 SM-AHN 分别被标记为“MCL-成熟”(N=9)和 SM-ALN(N=22),并与 ICC 定义的 MCL 和 SM-AMN 相区分。纳入了 Mayoclinic 联盟中影响 SM 生存的危险因素的多变量分析显示,ICC 分类比 WHO 分类更能准确预测生存:(i)MCL-不成熟比 MCL-成熟的生存预后更差(风险比[HR]15;p<0.01),(ii)在 ICC 分类中确认了 MCL 和 SM-AHN/AMN 之间的预后差异(HR 9.3;p<0.01),但在 WHO 分类中则不然(p=0.99),(iii)MCL-成熟与 SM-AMN 的生存相似(p=0.18),(iv)SM-AMN(HR 1.7;p<0.01)而非 SM-ALN(p=0.37)与 ASM 具有不同的预后。本研究为 ICC 系统和 Mayoclinic 联盟影响 SM 生存的危险因素对 SM-Adv 具有独立的预后贡献提供了证据。