Department of Dosimetry and Physico-Technical Support of Radiation Therapy, Kazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology, 91Abay Ave., Almaty 050022, Kazakhstan.
Department of Solid State and Nonlinear Physics, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Sep 1;24(9):3133-3138. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.9.3133.
Brachytherapy is used in 17 radiotherapy facilities In Kazakhstan. Each institution has an individual quality control (QC) program in place to ensure the safe and accurate delivery of the treatment dose to the patient. The main objective of this paper is to explore current approaches to quality control of brachytherapy in Kazakhstan and reduce potential discrepancies in testing frequency and tolerance limits by identifying a set of basic quality control requirements.
A detailed brachytherapy quality control questionnaire was provided to 17 radiotherapy institutions for completion. A separate questionnaire was sent to two institutions associated with brachytherapy. Questions addressed safety aspects, radiation parameters, total time spent on quality control, and available imaging systems for dose determination. The results of the survey were compared with the recommendations set found in international brachytherapy quality control documents.
The results of the questionnaires revealed significant differences in the frequency and methods of testing. For example, only two of the 17 centers have at least some kind of quality assurance program for brachytherapy treatment. Only five centers have equipment with the help of which dosimetric control can be performed, and only two centers have local medical physicists performing this control. One of the centers is checked quarterly, while the other is checked only once a year. In the remaining 15 centers, dosimetric control is performed by specialists who recharge the source without providing any document or protocol. There were also significant differences in the amount of time spent on quality control, mostly related to the variety of approaches to quality control and differences in the availability of resources. Almost all centers (15 of 17) rely only on inspections from the radionuclide source supplier and do not monitor the dosimetric and mechanical parameters of the facility at all.
Based on the results of the survey and comparison with international recommendations, a set of basic requirements for brachytherapy quality control is needed.
在哈萨克斯坦的 17 家放射治疗机构中使用近距离放射治疗。每个机构都有单独的质量控制(QC)计划,以确保安全准确地将治疗剂量输送给患者。本文的主要目的是探讨哈萨克斯坦近距离放射治疗的当前质量控制方法,并通过确定一套基本的质量控制要求来减少测试频率和容差的潜在差异。
向 17 家放射治疗机构提供详细的近距离放射治疗质量控制调查问卷以供填写。还向两家与近距离放射治疗相关的机构发送了单独的问卷。问题涉及安全方面、辐射参数、用于质量控制的总时间以及用于剂量确定的可用成像系统。将调查结果与国际近距离放射治疗质量控制文件中的建议进行比较。
调查问卷的结果显示,测试的频率和方法存在显著差异。例如,17 个中心中只有两个至少有某种形式的近距离放射治疗质量保证计划。只有五个中心拥有可以进行剂量测定的设备,只有两个中心有当地的医学物理学家进行此控制。其中一个中心每季度检查一次,而另一个中心每年仅检查一次。在其余 15 个中心中,剂量测定控制由负责重新充电源的专家进行,而不提供任何文件或协议。在质量控制上花费的时间也存在显著差异,主要与质量控制方法的多样性以及资源可用性的差异有关。几乎所有中心(17 个中的 15 个)仅依赖于放射性核素源供应商的检查,根本不监测设施的剂量学和机械参数。
根据调查结果并与国际建议进行比较,需要制定一套近距离放射治疗质量控制的基本要求。