• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

GUMMETAL®与不锈钢合金在犬类牵引中的比较:一项试点分口随机对照试验。

Comparison of GUMMETAL® and stainless steel alloy during canine retraction: A pilot split-mouth randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.

出版信息

Int Orthod. 2023 Dec;21(4):100810. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100810. Epub 2023 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100810
PMID:37774499
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A TiNb alloy wire (GUMMETAL® [GM], Toyota Central R&D Labs, Inc., Nagakute, Japan) was recently developed with unique properties for orthodontic applications. This pilot split-mouth randomized controlled trial compared maxillary canine retraction during space closure using sliding mechanics on GM vs. stainless steel (SS) archwires.

METHODS

Subjects who met the inclusion criteria were treated with fixed appliances and maxillary first-premolar extractions between September 2020 and March 2022. After leveling and aligning, maxillary archwires, fabricated by crimping together segments of 0.016×0.022" GM and SS archwires, were placed and canine retraction initiated using nickel-titanium coil springs. Digital models of the maxillary arch were superimposed at 0, 4, 8 and 12 weeks and the amount of canine movement (mm), rate of movement (mm/month), and 3-dimensional changes (rotational, vertical extrusion, tip) were measured and compared statistically.

RESULTS

Of the 12 subjects recruited, only six completed the study with a median age of 15.8 years (12.0-17.4 years). At 12 weeks, the median canine retraction was 3.41mm (IQR: 2.10, 4.76) with GM versus 3.71mm (IQR: 1.62, 6.45) with SS. The retraction rate was 1.14mm/month (IQR: 0.69, 1.59) with GM, versus 1.24mm/month (IQR: 0.54, 2.15) with SS. The median rotational, vertical and tip changes of the canine were 7.90̊, 0.59mm and 6.15̊ with GM, and 7.25̊, 0.29mm and 2.05̊ with SS. Intergroup differences with all measurements were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were found between GM and SS during maxillary canine retraction. GM demonstrated clinical potential for space closure mechanics, however, future larger studies are needed.

摘要

目的

一种 TiNb 合金丝(GUMMETAL® [GM],丰田中央研发实验室,Nagakute,日本)最近因其在正畸应用中的独特特性而被开发出来。这项试点分口随机对照试验比较了使用滑动机制在 GM 与不锈钢(SS)弓丝上关闭间隙时上颌尖牙的回收情况。

方法

符合纳入标准的受试者于 2020 年 9 月至 2022 年 3 月期间接受固定矫治器和上颌第一前磨牙拔除治疗。在整平排齐后,通过将 0.016×0.022" GM 和 SS 弓丝的片段压接在一起来制作上颌弓丝,并使用镍钛螺旋弹簧开始尖牙回收。在 0、4、8 和 12 周时对上颌弓丝的数字模型进行叠加,并对尖牙的移动量(mm)、移动速度(mm/月)和 3 维变化(旋转、垂直挤压、尖端)进行测量和统计学比较。

结果

在招募的 12 名受试者中,只有 6 名完成了研究,中位年龄为 15.8 岁(12.0-17.4 岁)。在 12 周时,GM 的中位尖牙回收量为 3.41mm(IQR:2.10,4.76),SS 为 3.71mm(IQR:1.62,6.45)。GM 的回收速度为 1.14mm/月(IQR:0.69,1.59),SS 为 1.24mm/月(IQR:0.54,2.15)。GM 的尖牙旋转、垂直和尖端变化的中位数分别为 7.90°、0.59mm 和 6.15°,SS 为 7.25°、0.29mm 和 2.05°。所有测量指标的组间差异均无统计学意义。

结论

在上颌尖牙回收过程中,GM 与 SS 之间未发现显著差异。GM 显示出在关闭间隙力学方面的临床潜力,但需要进一步开展更大规模的研究。

相似文献

1
Comparison of GUMMETAL® and stainless steel alloy during canine retraction: A pilot split-mouth randomized controlled trial.GUMMETAL®与不锈钢合金在犬类牵引中的比较:一项试点分口随机对照试验。
Int Orthod. 2023 Dec;21(4):100810. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100810. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
2
Friction forces generated by aesthetic Gummetal® (Ti-Nb) orthodontic archwires: A comparative in vitro study.审美型 Gummetal®(Ti-Nb)正畸弓丝产生的摩擦力:一项比较性的体外研究。
Int Orthod. 2022 Dec;20(4):100683. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100683. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
3
The Effect of Using Self-ligating Brackets on Maxillary Canine Retraction: A Split-mouth Design Randomized Controlled Trial.使用自锁托槽对上颌尖牙后移的影响:一项双盲设计随机对照试验。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Jun 1;17(6):496-503. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1879.
4
Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.犬牙后移过程中微型螺钉种植体或跨腭弓介导的支抗增强:一项随机临床试验
J Orthod. 2012 Jun;39(2):102-10. doi: 10.1179/14653121226878.
5
Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces.重度和轻度持续正畸力作用下的牙齿移动速率
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Aug;136(2):150.e1-9; discussion 150-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.026.
6
A comparison of space closure rates between preactivated nickel-titanium and titanium-molybdenum alloy T-loops: a randomized controlled clinical trial.预激活镍钛和钛钼合金 T 形圈的间隙关闭率比较:一项随机对照临床试验。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Feb;34(1):33-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq156. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
7
Nickel titanium springs versus stainless steel springs: A randomized clinical trial of two methods of space closure.镍钛合金弹簧与不锈钢弹簧:两种间隙关闭方法的随机临床试验。
J Orthod. 2016 Sep;43(3):176-85. doi: 10.1080/14653125.2015.1122260. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
8
Evaluation of Periodontal Changes Adjacent to Extraction Sites during Upper Canine Retraction.上颌尖牙后移过程中拔牙位点周围牙周变化的评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Feb 1;18(2):117-125. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2001.
9
Anchorage loss during canine retraction using intermittent versus continuous force distractions; a split mouth randomized clinical trial.用间歇性与连续性力分散装置回收犬牙时的固位丢失:一项分口随机临床试验。
Prog Orthod. 2012 Sep;13(2):117-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pio.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 May 5.
10
Comparison of the orthodontic load systems created with elastomeric power chain to close extraction spaces on different rectangular archwires.比较弹性橡皮链正畸加载系统与不同方丝弓关闭拔牙间隙的效果。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Mar;141(3):262-268. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.09.007.