• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非插管与插管电视辅助胸腔镜肺大疱切除术的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。

Non-intubated vs. intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic bullectomy - a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Kuala Lumpur General Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Thoracic Surgery Unit, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Kuala Lumpur General Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Med J Malaysia. 2023 Sep;78(5):570-573.

PMID:37775481
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Thoracic surgery procedures evolved enormously over time from open surgery to video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and now non-intubated uniportal VATS. At our centre, the initial approach for bullectomy was by uniportal intubated VATS (iVATS) for most cases. Only in mid-2020, in the midst of COVID-19 pandemic, uniportal non-intubated VATS (NiVATS) took precedence. We compared the outcome of bullectomy via iVATS versus NiVATS for a period of 5 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of all patients that underwent bullectomy from 1st June 2017 to 31st May 2022. Mann Whitney U-test was completed for all variables. Primary objective was to compare operating time (OT), global operating time (GOT), post-operative length of stay (LOS) and complication rate.

RESULTS

A total of 90 bullectomies performed in which 36 were approached via iVATS and 54 NiVATS. It was found that the post-operative LOS, GOT, and OT were significantly shorter in the NiVATS as compared to iVATS. Complication rate between both groups showed no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

NiVATS bullectomy demonstrated a safe and reliable alternative surgical approach with superior surgical outcome than iVATS bullectomy.

摘要

引言

胸腔外科手术技术随着时间的推移经历了巨大的发展,从开胸手术到电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS),现在是非插管单端口 VATS。在我们中心,对于肺大疱切除术的初始方法是对大多数病例进行单端口插管 VATS(iVATS)。直到 2020 年年中,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,非插管单端口 VATS(NiVATS)才优先考虑。我们比较了 iVATS 与 NiVATS 治疗肺大疱的 5 年结果。

材料与方法

我们回顾了 2017 年 6 月 1 日至 2022 年 5 月 31 日期间接受肺大疱切除术的所有患者的病历。对所有变量均完成了曼-惠特尼 U 检验。主要目的是比较手术时间(OT)、总手术时间(GOT)、术后住院时间(LOS)和并发症发生率。

结果

共进行了 90 例肺大疱切除术,其中 36 例采用 iVATS 入路,54 例采用 NiVATS 入路。结果发现,与 iVATS 相比,NiVATS 的术后 LOS、GOT 和 OT 明显缩短。两组的并发症发生率无显著差异。

结论

NiVATS 肺大疱切除术是一种安全可靠的替代手术方法,其手术结果优于 iVATS 肺大疱切除术。

相似文献

1
Non-intubated vs. intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic bullectomy - a retrospective cohort study.非插管与插管电视辅助胸腔镜肺大疱切除术的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Med J Malaysia. 2023 Sep;78(5):570-573.
2
Perioperative outcomes of non-intubated versus intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in different thoracic procedures: a propensity score-matched analysis.非插管与插管电视辅助胸腔镜手术在不同胸部手术中的围手术期结局:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May 19;22(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01667-9.
3
Nonintubated versus intubated thoracoscopic bullectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: A multicenter propensity-matched analysis.非插管与插管胸腔镜下肺大疱切除术治疗原发性自发性气胸:一项多中心倾向匹配分析
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2022 Nov;30(9):1010-1016. doi: 10.1177/02184923221129239. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
4
Non-intubated versus intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer patients.非插管与插管电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术治疗肺癌患者
Asian J Surg. 2024 Jan;47(1):402-406. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.09.038. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
5
Effects of Non-intubated Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery on Patients With Pulmonary Dysfunction.非插管电视辅助胸腔镜手术对肺功能障碍患者的影响。
Front Surg. 2022 Jan 6;8:792709. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.792709. eCollection 2021.
6
Comparison of non-intubated and intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries of major pulmonary resections for lung cancer-a meta-analysis.非插管与插管电视辅助胸腔镜手术用于肺癌肺叶切除的比较——一项荟萃分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar 23;19(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02181-x.
7
Efficacy of intraoperative thoracoscopic intercostal nerve blocks in nonintubated and intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery: A randomized study.非插管和插管电视辅助胸腔镜手术中术中胸腔镜肋间神经阻滞的疗效:一项随机研究。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2023 Oct;122(10):986-993. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.05.025. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
8
Establishing a non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery programme for bilateral uniportal sympathectomy.建立非插管胸腔镜手术程序,用于双侧单孔交感神经切除术。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2019 Apr 17;149:w20064. doi: 10.4414/smw.2019.20064. eCollection 2019 Apr 8.
9
A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis for Non-Intubated Thoracic Surgery.非插管式胸腔手术的倾向评分匹配分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Nov 11;24:8081-8087. doi: 10.12659/MSM.910605.
10
Non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for thoracic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1,684 cases.非插管电视辅助胸腔镜手术与插管电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗胸部疾病:1684例病例的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Aug;11(8):3556-3568. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.07.48.

引用本文的文献

1
Current New Approach in Thoracoscopic Surgery: Non-Intubated Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (NI-UniVATS).胸腔镜手术的当前新方法:非插管单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术(NI-UniVATS)。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 1;61(4):641. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040641.
2
From Awake to Minimalist Spontaneous Ventilation Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery: An Ongoing Journey.从清醒到微创自主通气胸腔镜肺手术:一段持续的征程。
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 4;14(7):2475. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072475.