Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, The University of Manchester, Ellen Wilkinson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Ann Work Expo Health. 2024 Jan 8;68(1):1-7. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxad060.
In May 2023 the World Health Organization (WHO) Director General announced the "end" of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency of International Concern. Although the scale of the pandemic was unprecedented in living memory, it had not been unforeseen. Previous outbreaks of viral respiratory disease have shown important lessons regarding the need to protect healthcare workers (HCW), and research has also been undertaken into the relative effectiveness of control measures and their resource implications. Relevant guidance for worker protection, including HCW protection, which existed at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic was disregarded both at international and national governmental levels. In many countries there were significant systemic flaws in strategy, culture, and resource availability, and hence in overall preparedness. When the pandemic struck, many experts and organizations advocated a precautionary approach with regard to worker protection, consistent with good occupational hygiene science, practice, and standards. In many Asian countries, protective measures were relatively stringent. However, many workers were left unprotected especially as the WHO, the United States, the United Kingdom, and other governments did not pursue adequate COVID-19 protective measures at work. As the pandemic progressed, improvements in protection were patchy. A notable lack of protection arose from the underestimation of the contribution of aerosol exposure to infection risks, particularly among HCWs providing routine care of potentially infectious patients. A disciplined strategy of source control, pathway control (such as ventilation), and receptor control notably Respiratory Protective Equipment is needed, as well as worldwide vaccination, to contend with this pandemic. Control measures appropriate to the risk of infections transmitted through the air will remain necessary in the longer term, as well as adaptations in the workplace to take account of long-term COVID-19 morbidity and new work practices.
2023 年 5 月,世界卫生组织(WHO)总干事宣布 COVID-19 国际关注的突发公共卫生事件结束。尽管大流行的规模是人们记忆中前所未有的,但并非无法预见。以前的病毒性呼吸道疾病暴发表明,需要保护医护人员(HCW),并对控制措施的相对有效性及其资源影响进行了研究。关于工人保护的相关指南,包括 HCW 保护,在 COVID-19 大流行开始时就存在,但在国际和国家政府层面都被忽视了。在许多国家,战略、文化和资源可用性方面存在重大系统缺陷,因此整体准备不足。大流行来袭时,许多专家和组织主张采取预防措施保护工人,这与良好的职业卫生科学、实践和标准一致。在许多亚洲国家,保护措施相对严格。然而,许多工人没有得到保护,尤其是在世卫组织、美国、英国和其他政府没有在工作场所采取足够的 COVID-19 保护措施的情况下。随着大流行的发展,保护措施有所改善。由于低估了气溶胶暴露对感染风险的贡献,特别是在为可能感染的患者提供常规护理的 HCW 中,因此出现了明显的保护不足。需要采取一种有纪律的策略来控制源头、路径(如通风)和受体,特别是呼吸保护设备,以及全球疫苗接种,以应对这种大流行。在更长的时间内,需要采取适当的空气传播感染控制措施,以及适应工作场所,以应对长期 COVID-19 发病率和新的工作实践。