• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胆囊切除术后切口部位布比卡因浸润与否对疼痛控制和镇痛药物消耗的比较。

Comparison of Pain Control and Analgesic Consumption With or Without Infiltration of Bupivacaine at Port Sites after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

机构信息

Dr Iffat Sharmin, Resident, Department of Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh; E-mail:

出版信息

Mymensingh Med J. 2023 Oct;32(4):1133-1139.

PMID:37777912
Abstract

Pain management is an essential component of all surgical procedures. Analgesics are used for this purpose but there are some complications in using them. Local anesthetics like bupivacaine can be used to reduce postoperative pain as well as analgesics consumption. The objective of this study is to observe the result of infiltration of bupivacaine at port sites and to compare the postoperative pain relief with that of opioids and NSAID administration following laparoscopic cholecystectomy for chronic calculus cholecystitis. This is a cross sectional study was conducted over one year in the Department of Surgery of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh from September 2018 to August 2019. Here total 40 patients were enrolled by purposive sampling. They were divided in two groups. One group received bupivacaine while other did not. A numerical pain scale was used as tool. Data will be recorded by peer reviewed interview and observation based semi structured data collection sheet. Data analysis was done by SPSS version 23.0. P-value was significant at (p<0.05) and determined by chi square test. Written informed consent was taken from the patient. The mean Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score of pain at 6 hour was 2.55±0.6 in Group I and 6.8±1.15 in Group II. The mean NRS score of pain at 12 hour was 4.1±1.21 in Group I and 7.95±0.6 in Group II. The mean time of 1st analgesic administration was 13.85±1.57 hours in Group I and 2.75±0.72 hours in Group II. The mean repeat dose of analgesic was in 22±2.29 hours in Group I and 9.5±1.15 hours in Group II. In Group I one third patients (30.0%) single dose analgesic required in 1st 12 hours while in Group II almost 90.0% patients needed analgesics in 1st 12 hours. In Group I, total doses of analgesics required were 2 in 75.0% patients while in Group II at least 3 doses of analgesics were needed. In Group I only one patient needed analgesic in first 6 hours (5.0%) while in Group II, all the patients (100.0%) needed analgesics. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.05) between two groups. The patients receiving bupivacaine at port sites will experience less pain at postoperative period and will need less analgesic medications.

摘要

疼痛管理是所有外科手术的重要组成部分。为此使用了镇痛药,但使用它们存在一些并发症。局部麻醉剂如布比卡因可用于减轻术后疼痛和减少镇痛药的消耗。本研究的目的是观察布比卡因在端口部位的浸润效果,并比较其与阿片类药物和 NSAID 给药在慢性结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的术后疼痛缓解效果。这是一项在孟加拉国达卡的 Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib 医科大学(BSMMU)外科系进行的为期一年的横断面研究,时间为 2018 年 9 月至 2019 年 8 月。共纳入 40 名患者,采用目的性抽样。他们被分为两组。一组接受布比卡因,另一组不接受。使用数字疼痛量表作为工具。通过同行评议访谈和基于半结构化数据收集表的观察记录数据。使用 SPSS 版本 23.0 进行数据分析。P 值具有统计学意义(p<0.05),由卡方检验确定。患者签署了书面知情同意书。第 I 组在 6 小时时的平均数字评定量表(NRS)疼痛评分是 2.55±0.6,第 II 组是 6.8±1.15。第 I 组在 12 小时时的平均 NRS 疼痛评分是 4.1±1.21,第 II 组是 7.95±0.6。第 I 组第 1 次镇痛给药的平均时间是 13.85±1.57 小时,第 II 组是 2.75±0.72 小时。第 I 组第 1 次镇痛的平均重复剂量是 22±2.29 小时,第 II 组是 9.5±1.15 小时。第 I 组中有三分之一的患者(30.0%)在第 1 个 12 小时内仅需单次剂量的镇痛药,而第 II 组中有近 90.0%的患者在第 1 个 12 小时内需要镇痛药。第 I 组中,75.0%的患者需要 2 剂镇痛剂,而第 II 组中至少需要 3 剂镇痛剂。第 I 组中仅 1 名患者(5.0%)在第 1 个 6 小时内需要镇痛剂,而第 II 组中所有患者(100.0%)都需要镇痛剂。两组之间的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。在端口部位接受布比卡因的患者在术后期间将经历较少的疼痛,并将需要较少的镇痛药。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Pain Control and Analgesic Consumption With or Without Infiltration of Bupivacaine at Port Sites after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后切口部位布比卡因浸润与否对疼痛控制和镇痛药物消耗的比较。
Mymensingh Med J. 2023 Oct;32(4):1133-1139.
2
Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing standard analgesia with combined intra-operative cystic plate and port-site local anesthesia for post-operative pain management in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.前瞻性随机对照试验:比较标准镇痛与术中联合胆囊板及切口局部麻醉用于择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛管理的效果
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):704-713. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5024-5. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
3
Intraperitoneal application of bupivacaine plus morphine for pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.布比卡因加吗啡腹腔内给药用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的疼痛缓解
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003 Nov;20(11):891-6. doi: 10.1017/s0265021503001431.
4
Effect of Bupivacaine on Postoperative Pain after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.布比卡因对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛的影响。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2018 Sep;28(9):663-666. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2018.09.663.
5
The postoperative analgesic efficacy of intraperitoneal bupivacaine compared with levobupivacaine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中腹腔注射布比卡因与左旋布比卡因术后镇痛效果比较
Acta Chir Belg. 2014 May-Jun;114(3):174-8. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2014.11681004.
6
Intraperitoneal analgesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: bupivacaine versus bupivacaine with tramadol.腹腔镜胆囊切除术的腹腔内镇痛:布比卡因与布比卡因联合曲马多的比较。
Coll Antropol. 2009 Mar;33(1):299-302.
7
Prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of local anesthetic and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for postoperative pain management after laparoscopic surgery.局部麻醉药与非甾体类抗炎药用于腹腔镜手术后疼痛管理的前瞻性、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照比较。
Am Surg. 2007 Jun;73(6):618-24; discussion 624-5.
8
Bilateral 4-quadrant laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block reduces early postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective, single-blind, randomized study.双侧四象限腹腔镜辅助腹横肌平面阻滞减少腹腔镜胆囊切除术后早期疼痛:一项前瞻性、单盲、随机研究。
Saudi Med J. 2023 Feb;44(2):145-154. doi: 10.15537/smj.2023.44.2.20220407.
9
Postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised prospective double-blind clinical trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的疼痛缓解:一项随机前瞻性双盲临床试验。
Scand J Surg. 2003;92(2):121-4.
10
Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block for acute postoperative pain relief in kidney recipients: a double-blinded clinical trial.腹横肌平面阻滞对肾移植受者术后急性疼痛缓解的疗效:一项双盲临床试验。
Pain Med. 2014 Mar;15(3):460-4. doi: 10.1111/pme.12311. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The evaluation of feasibility of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy using intraoperative instillation of bupivacaine: a retrospective observational study.术中滴注布比卡因用于门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性评估:一项回顾性观察研究。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024 Jul;107(1):35-41. doi: 10.4174/astr.2024.107.1.35. Epub 2024 Jun 28.