Suppr超能文献

系统评价和荟萃分析局部使用氨甲环酸在脊柱手术中的应用。

Systematic review and meta-analysis of topical tranexamic acid in spine surgery.

机构信息

1Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.

2School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California; and.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Oct;55(4):E18. doi: 10.3171/2023.7.FOCUS23363.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic drug associated with reduced blood loss in a range of surgical specialties, including neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, and cardiac surgery. Concerns about venous thromboembolism and seizures from intravenous (IV) TXA have led to increased use of topical TXA. Given the relative scarcity of the literature on topical TXA compared with that on IV TXA within neurosurgery, the authors aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the safety, efficacy, and optimal administration of topical TXA in a wide range of spinal procedures and pathologies.

METHODS

The PRISMA guidelines, Cochrane risk of bias tool, and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to extract randomized controlled trials and high-quality case-control and cross-sectional/cohort studies (adult studies only) from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase published between 2016 and 2023. Studies were analyzed by two independent reviewers for variables including dosage, TXA administration route, type of spine procedure, blood loss, adverse events including thromboembolism and infection, postoperative hemoglobin level, and hospitalization length. Pooled analysis comparing intraoperative and postoperative blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin levels, and hospitalization length of stay on the basis of route of TXA administration was conducted.

RESULTS

Four cohort studies, 1 cross-sectional study, 1 case-control study, and 12 randomized controlled trials, together involving 2045 patients, were included. The most common route of topical TXA administration was via TXA in saline solution. Other routes of topical TXA included retrograde injection and TXA-soaked Gelfoam. In pooled analysis, topical TXA significantly reduced visible blood loss (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.22, 95% CI -0.45 to -0.00001), postoperative blood loss (SMD -1.63, 95% CI -2.03 to -1.22), and length of hospital stay (SMD -1.02, 95% CI -1.42 to -0.61), as well as higher postoperative hemoglobin (SMD 0.59, 95% CI 0.34-0.83), compared with non-TXA controls. No significant differences in outcomes were found between topical and IV TXA or between combined (topical and IV) and IV TXA. Thromboembolism and infection rates did not significantly differ between any TXA administration group and non-TXA controls.

CONCLUSIONS

In pooled analyses, topical TXA was associated with decreased perioperative blood loss in a wide range of scenarios, including cervical spine surgery and thoracolumbar trauma, as well as in patients with a thromboembolic history.

摘要

目的

氨甲环酸(TXA)是一种抗纤维蛋白溶解药物,可减少神经外科、矫形外科和心脏外科等多个外科专业的失血量。静脉(IV)TXA 引起的静脉血栓栓塞和癫痫发作的担忧导致局部 TXA 的使用增加。鉴于神经外科中局部 TXA 的文献相对较少,与 IV TXA 相比,作者旨在对广泛的脊柱手术和病理中局部 TXA 的安全性、疗效和最佳给药途径进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

方法

使用 PRISMA 指南、Cochrane 偏倚风险工具和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表,从 PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆和 Embase 中提取 2016 年至 2023 年发表的随机对照试验和高质量病例对照和横断面/队列研究(仅限成人研究)。两名独立评审员对变量进行分析,包括剂量、TXA 给药途径、脊柱手术类型、失血量、包括血栓栓塞和感染在内的不良事件、术后血红蛋白水平和住院时间。根据 TXA 给药途径进行了比较术中及术后失血量、术后血红蛋白水平和住院时间的汇总分析。

结果

共纳入 4 项队列研究、1 项横断面研究、1 项病例对照研究和 12 项随机对照试验,共涉及 2045 例患者。局部 TXA 最常见的给药途径是 TXA 生理盐水溶液。其他局部 TXA 给药途径包括逆行注射和 TXA 浸泡的 Gelfoam。在汇总分析中,与非-TXA 对照组相比,局部 TXA 显著减少了可见失血量(标准化均数差 [SMD] -0.22,95%CI -0.45 至 -0.00001)、术后失血量(SMD -1.63,95%CI -2.03 至 -1.22)和住院时间(SMD -1.02,95%CI -1.42 至 -0.61),以及更高的术后血红蛋白(SMD 0.59,95%CI 0.34-0.83)。局部 TXA 与 IV TXA 或联合(局部和 IV)与 IV TXA 之间的结果无显著差异。任何 TXA 给药组与非-TXA 对照组之间的血栓栓塞和感染发生率均无显著差异。

结论

在汇总分析中,局部 TXA 与广泛的手术场景(包括颈椎手术和胸腰椎创伤)以及有血栓栓塞病史的患者中围手术期失血量减少相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验