Department of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116021, China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Nov 1;19(1):707. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05215-8.
Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine (C-OPLL) is a degenerative disorder that leads to the narrowing of the spinal canal and compression of both the spinal cord and nerve roots. This condition is more prevalent in East Asian populations, with marked regional variations in incidence. Symptoms include neck pain, restricted movement, limb numbness, and motor impairment. In severe cases, surgery may be required.Surgical strategies for C-OPLL can be divided into anterior and posterior approaches, each offering distinct advantages and limitations. Anterior approaches, such as anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), anterior floating method and vertebral body sliding osteotomy (VBSO), provide the benefit of direct decompression but are technically demanding and carry a higher risk of complications. In contrast, posterior approaches, including laminectomy (with or without instrumented fusion) and laminoplasty (LAMP), offer indirect decompression but may increase the risk of cervical kyphosis. In recent years, innovative techniques like anterior cervical ossified posterior longitudinal ligament en bloc resection (ACOE), anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF), and minimally invasive endoscopic spine surgery have been developed to reduce complications and enhance surgical outcomes.Selecting the appropriate surgical technique requires a thorough assessment of factors such as the severity of the lesion, cervical alignment, and the surgeon's experience. This narrative review examines the differences between these surgical options, discusses their respective advantages and disadvantages, and provides updated insights and recommendations.
颈椎后纵韧带骨化症(C-OPLL)是一种退行性疾病,可导致椎管狭窄,并压迫脊髓和神经根。这种情况在东亚人群中更为常见,发病率存在明显的区域性差异。其症状包括颈部疼痛、活动受限、肢体麻木和运动功能障碍。在严重的情况下,可能需要手术。颈椎后纵韧带骨化症的手术策略可分为前路和后路,每种方法都有其独特的优势和局限性。前路方法,如前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术(ACCF)、前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)、前路浮动法和椎体滑动截骨术(VBSO),提供了直接减压的益处,但技术要求高,并发症风险较高。相比之下,后路方法包括椎板切除术(伴或不伴器械融合)和椎板成形术(LAMP),提供了间接减压的益处,但可能增加颈椎后凸的风险。近年来,为了降低并发症发生率和提高手术效果,出现了一些创新性技术,如前路颈椎骨化后纵韧带整块切除(ACOE)、前路可控前移位融合(ACAF)和微创内镜脊柱外科手术。选择合适的手术技术需要综合评估病变的严重程度、颈椎的排列和外科医生的经验等因素。本叙述性综述探讨了这些手术选择之间的差异,讨论了它们各自的优缺点,并提供了最新的见解和建议。