• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期肠内营养对活体肝移植后移植物丢失的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。

Effect of Early Enteral Nutrition on Graft Loss After Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2023 Nov;55(9):2164-2170. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.07.029. Epub 2023 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.07.029
PMID:37778930
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to elucidate the effect of early enteral nutrition on graft loss within 12 h after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using propensity score-matching analysis and subsequently examine the risk factors for graft loss after LDLT.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 467 LDLT patients who were assigned to the early and non-early groups based on the optimal cutoff value of 12 h for the starting time of early enteral nutrition after LDLT to predict graft loss.

RESULTS

The 1-year graft survival rate of the early group before propensity score-matching was 92.1%, whereas the 1-year graft survival rate of the non-early group was 86.2%. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .067). The incidences of early allograft dysfunction (EAD), small-for-size graft (SFSG) syndrome, acute cellular rejection (ACR), and sepsis were not statistically different between the 2 groups (P = .12, .91, .46, and .056, respectively). After propensity score-matching, the 1-year graft survival rate of the early group was 94.4%, whereas the 1-year graft survival rate of the non-early group was 85.4% (P = .034). The incidences of EAD, SFSG syndrome, and ACR were not statistically different between the 2 groups (P = .43, .81, and .24, respectively). However, the incidence of sepsis was statistically different between the 2 groups (non-early: 10.7% vs early: 3.6%, P = .038).

CONCLUSION

Early enteral nutrition within 12 h after LDLT may contribute to better graft survival in LDLT patients by preventing sepsis.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在通过倾向评分匹配分析阐明活体肝移植(LDLT)后 12 小时内早期肠内营养对移植物丢失的影响,随后探讨 LDLT 后移植物丢失的危险因素。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 467 例 LDLT 患者的数据,根据 LDLT 后早期肠内营养开始时间的最佳 12 小时截断值,将这些患者分为早期组和非早期组,以预测移植物丢失。

结果

在进行倾向评分匹配之前,早期组的 1 年移植物存活率为 92.1%,而非早期组的 1 年移植物存活率为 86.2%。两组间无显著差异(P=0.067)。两组间早期移植物功能障碍(EAD)、小肝综合征(SFSG)、急性细胞排斥(ACR)和脓毒症的发生率无统计学差异(P=0.12、0.91、0.46 和 0.056)。经过倾向评分匹配后,早期组的 1 年移植物存活率为 94.4%,而非早期组的 1 年移植物存活率为 85.4%(P=0.034)。两组间 EAD、SFSG 综合征和 ACR 的发生率无统计学差异(P=0.43、0.81 和 0.24)。然而,两组间脓毒症的发生率存在统计学差异(非早期组:10.7%;早期组:3.6%,P=0.038)。

结论

LDLT 后 12 小时内早期肠内营养可能通过预防脓毒症有助于改善 LDLT 患者的移植物存活率。

相似文献

1
Effect of Early Enteral Nutrition on Graft Loss After Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.早期肠内营养对活体肝移植后移植物丢失的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
Transplant Proc. 2023 Nov;55(9):2164-2170. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.07.029. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
2
Simultaneous splenectomy improves outcomes after adult living donor liver transplantation.成人活体肝移植术后同期脾切除术可改善预后。
J Hepatol. 2021 Feb;74(2):372-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.08.017. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
3
Bacterial sepsis after living donor liver transplantation: the impact of early enteral nutrition.活体肝移植术后细菌败血症:早期肠内营养的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Mar;214(3):288-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.12.001. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
4
Does modification of portal pressure and flow enhance recovery of the recipient after living donor liver transplantation? A systematic review of literature and expert panel recommendations.门静脉压力和血流的改变能否提高活体肝移植受者的恢复情况?一项文献系统综述及专家小组建议。
Clin Transplant. 2022 Oct;36(10):e14657. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14657.
5
Comparison of acute kidney injury between ABO-compatible and ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation: A propensity matching analysis.ABO 血型相容与 ABO 血型不相容活体供肝移植的急性肾损伤比较:一项倾向匹配分析。
Liver Transpl. 2016 Dec;22(12):1656-1665. doi: 10.1002/lt.24634.
6
Outcomes of adult patients adopting small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.成人患者在活体肝移植中采用小体积供肝移植物的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2019 Jun;18(3):206-213. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
7
Acute kidney injury after orthotopic liver transplantation using living donor versus deceased donor grafts: A propensity score-matched analysis.活体供体与尸体供体肝移植后急性肾损伤的倾向评分匹配分析
Liver Transpl. 2015 Sep;21(9):1179-85. doi: 10.1002/lt.24166. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
8
The outcomes and biliary complications of a staged biliary reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation: a propensity score matched analysis.分期胆道重建在活体肝移植中的结局和胆道并发症:倾向评分匹配分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2024 Jul;26(7):928-937. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.03.1160. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
9
Patterns of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Adult Live Donor Liver Transplantation: The A2ALL Experience.成人活体供肝移植早期移植肝功能障碍模式:A2ALL研究经验
Transplantation. 2016 Jul;100(7):1490-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001240.
10
Comparison of Liver Graft Regeneration Between ABO-Compatible and ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.ABO血型相容与ABO血型不相容活体供肝肝移植中肝移植肝再生的比较:倾向评分匹配分析
Ann Transplant. 2018 Jul 27;23:507-519. doi: 10.12659/AOT.908787.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing sepsis therapy: the evolving role of enteral nutrition.加强脓毒症治疗:肠内营养不断演变的作用。
Front Nutr. 2024 Oct 1;11:1421632. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1421632. eCollection 2024.