Department of Forensic Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Integrative Life Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
J Forensic Sci. 2023 Nov;68(6):2116-2127. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15371. Epub 2023 Oct 1.
While efforts have been made to reduce the pervasive backlog of sexual assault evidence collection kits, the actual laboratory process remains very time-consuming due to the requirement of a differential lysis step before DNA purification, as well as intricate mixture analysis towards the end of the DNA workflow. Recently, an alternative, direct-to-amplification sperm lysis method (using 1 M NaOH) was identified. However, a direct cell lysis method for non-sperm cells has not been identified yet. Thus, the primary objective of this work was to find an alternative method that is quick, inexpensive, and does not require multiple purification steps for the lysis of non-sperm cells in sexual assault samples. In this study, vaginal swab samples were lysed with the control method, prepGEM™, as well as six alternative reagents: alkaline buffer with 25-200 mM NaOH, high-salt stain extraction buffer, modified radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer, mammalian protein extraction reagent (M-PER™), digitonin buffer, and urea/thiourea buffer. Quantification using Quantifiler® Trio of vaginal and semen lysates revealed that the alkaline (25 mM NaOH) and M-PER™ methods were efficient for the lysis of vaginal epithelial cells without substantial sperm cell lysis. Following quantification, analysis of STR profiles from vaginal lysates revealed that the M-PER™ method showed promising results across all metrics examined, including the percentage of detected STR alleles, mean peak heights, peak height ratio, and interlocus balance. Thus, this method was recommended as an alternative to the traditional differential lysis method for non-sperm cells given its ability to produce amplification-ready lysates without any DNA purification step.
尽管已经做出努力来减少普遍存在的性侵犯证据采集套件积压,但由于在 DNA 纯化之前需要差异化裂解步骤,以及在 DNA 工作流程接近尾声时需要进行复杂的混合物分析,实际的实验室过程仍然非常耗时。最近,已经确定了一种替代的直接扩增精子裂解方法(使用 1M NaOH)。然而,尚未确定用于非精子细胞的直接细胞裂解方法。因此,这项工作的主要目标是找到一种替代方法,该方法快速、廉价,并且不需要多个纯化步骤即可裂解性侵犯样本中的非精子细胞。在这项研究中,使用对照方法 prepGEM™ 以及六种替代试剂裂解阴道拭子样本:碱性缓冲液(含 25-200mM NaOH)、高盐染色提取缓冲液、改良放射免疫沉淀测定 (RIPA) 缓冲液、哺乳动物蛋白提取试剂 (M-PER™)、十二烷基肌氨酸缓冲液和尿素/硫脲缓冲液。使用 Quantifiler® Trio 对阴道和精液裂解液进行定量,结果表明碱性(25mM NaOH)和 M-PER™ 方法对于裂解阴道上皮细胞而不大量裂解精子细胞非常有效。在定量之后,对阴道裂解物的 STR 谱进行分析表明,M-PER™ 方法在所有检查的指标上都显示出有希望的结果,包括检测到的 STR 等位基因的百分比、平均峰高、峰高比和基因座间平衡。因此,鉴于其能够产生无需任何 DNA 纯化步骤即可进行扩增的裂解液,该方法被推荐作为传统的非精子细胞差异化裂解方法的替代方法。