• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用参与式行动研究,增强地区医院工作人员的能力,为马拉维、赞比亚和坦桑尼亚的农村人口提供有质量保证的基本手术服务。

Using participatory action research to empower district hospital staff to deliver quality-assured essential surgery to rural populations in Malawi, Zambia, and Tanzania.

机构信息

School of Population Health, Institute of Global Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.

Nuffield Department of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 14;11:1186307. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1186307. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1186307
PMID:37780427
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10536269/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2017 the SURG-Africa project set out to institute a surgical, obstetric, trauma and anesthesia (SOTA) care capacity-building intervention focused on non-specialist providers at district hospitals in Zambia, Malawi and Tanzania. The aim was to scale up quality-assured SOTA care for rural populations. This paper reports the process of developing the intervention and our experience of initial implementation, using a participatory approach.

METHODS

Participatory Action Research workshops were held in the 3 countries in July-October 2017 and in October 2018-July 2019, involving representatives of key local stakeholder groups: district hospital (DH) surgical teams and administrators, referral hospital SOTA specialists, professional associations and local authorities. Through semi-structured discussions, qualitative data were collected on participants' perceptions and experiences of barriers to the provision of SOTA care at district level, and on the training and supervision needs of district surgical teams. Data were compared for themes across countries and across surgical team cadres.

RESULTS

All groups reported a lack of in-service training to develop essential skills to manage common SOTA cases; use and care of equipment; essential anesthesia care including resuscitation skills; and infection prevention and control. Very few district surgical teams had access to supervision. SOTA providers at DHs reported a demand for more feedback on referrals. Participants prioritized training needs that could be addressed through regular in-service training and supervision visits from referral hospital specialists to DHs. These data were used by participants in an action-planning cycle to develop site-specific training plans for each research site.

CONCLUSION

The inclusive, participatory approach to stakeholder involvement in SOTA system strengthening employed by this study supported the design of a locally relevant and contextualized intervention. This study provides lessons on how to rebalance power dynamics in Global Surgery, through giving a voice to district surgical teams.

摘要

背景

2017 年,SURG-Africa 项目着手实施一项外科、产科、创伤和麻醉(SOTA)护理能力建设干预措施,重点是赞比亚、马拉维和坦桑尼亚的地区医院的非专业提供者。目的是为农村人口扩大质量保证的 SOTA 护理。本文报告了干预措施的制定过程,以及我们在使用参与式方法实施初期的经验。

方法

2017 年 7 月至 10 月和 2018 年 10 月至 2019 年 7 月,在 3 个国家举行了参与式行动研究研讨会,参与者包括当地主要利益攸关方群体的代表:地区医院(DH)外科团队和管理人员、转诊医院 SOTA 专家、专业协会和地方当局。通过半结构化讨论,收集了关于参与者对地区一级提供 SOTA 护理的障碍的看法和经验,以及对地区外科团队的培训和监督需求的定性数据。对各国和外科团队干部的主题进行了比较。

结果

所有团体都报告说,缺乏在职培训来发展管理常见 SOTA 病例的基本技能;设备的使用和保养;基本的麻醉护理,包括复苏技能;以及感染预防和控制。很少有地区外科团队能够获得监督。DH 的 SOTA 提供者报告说,需要更多关于转诊的反馈。参与者优先考虑可以通过定期在职培训和转诊医院专家对 DH 进行监督访问来解决的培训需求。这些数据被参与者用于一个行动计划周期,为每个研究地点制定了具体的培训计划。

结论

本研究采用包容性、参与性的方法让利益攸关方参与 SOTA 系统的强化,支持了设计一个具有地方相关性和针对性的干预措施。本研究提供了关于如何通过赋予地区外科团队权力来重新平衡全球外科手术中的权力动态的经验教训。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b21e/10536269/866a3e15383a/fpubh-11-1186307-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b21e/10536269/866a3e15383a/fpubh-11-1186307-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b21e/10536269/866a3e15383a/fpubh-11-1186307-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Using participatory action research to empower district hospital staff to deliver quality-assured essential surgery to rural populations in Malawi, Zambia, and Tanzania.运用参与式行动研究,增强地区医院工作人员的能力,为马拉维、赞比亚和坦桑尼亚的农村人口提供有质量保证的基本手术服务。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 14;11:1186307. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1186307. eCollection 2023.
2
Anesthesia Capacity of District-Level Hospitals in Malawi, Tanzania, and Zambia: A Mixed-Methods Study.马拉维、坦桑尼亚和赞比亚地区级医院的麻醉能力:一项混合方法研究。
Anesth Analg. 2020 Apr;130(4):845-853. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004363.
3
Surgical ambulance referrals in sub-Saharan Africa - financial costs and coping strategies at district hospitals in Tanzania, Malawi and Zambia.撒哈拉以南非洲的外科救护车转诊——坦桑尼亚、马拉维和赞比亚地区医院的财务成本和应对策略。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 23;21(1):728. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06709-5.
4
Surgical service monitoring and quality control systems at district hospitals in Malawi, Tanzania and Zambia: a mixed-methods study.马拉维、坦桑尼亚和赞比亚地区医院的外科服务监测和质量控制系统:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Dec;30(12):950-960. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012751. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
5
Critical shortage of capacity to deliver safe paediatric surgery in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from 67 hospitals in Malawi, Zambia, and Tanzania.撒哈拉以南非洲地区安全开展小儿外科手术的能力严重短缺:来自马拉维、赞比亚和坦桑尼亚67家医院的证据。
Front Pediatr. 2023 May 31;11:1189676. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1189676. eCollection 2023.
6
Evaluation of a surgical supervision model in three African countries-protocol for a prospective mixed-methods controlled pilot trial.三个非洲国家手术监督模式的评估——一项前瞻性混合方法对照试验的方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Feb 18;5:25. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0409-6. eCollection 2019.
7
District health managers' perceptions of supervision in Malawi and Tanzania.马拉维和坦桑尼亚地区卫生经理对监督的看法。
Hum Resour Health. 2013 Sep 5;11:43. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-11-43.
8
Supervision as a tool for building surgical capacity of district hospitals: the case of Zambia.监督作为建立地区医院外科能力的工具:以赞比亚为例。
Hum Resour Health. 2020 Mar 26;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-00467-x.
9
Improving Access to Surgery Through Surgical Team Mentoring - Policy Lessons From Group Model Building With Local Stakeholders in Malawi.通过手术团队指导改善手术机会——马拉维地方利益攸关方群体建模的政策经验教训。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):1744-1755. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.78. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
10
Who accesses surgery at district level in sub-Saharan Africa? Evidence from Malawi and Zambia.在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,谁能在地区层面接受手术治疗?来自马拉维和赞比亚的证据。
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Dec;22(12):1533-1541. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12989. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence-Informed Surgical Systems Strengthening with Meaningful Stakeholder Involvement in Low-Resource Settings: A Response to Recent Commentaries.在资源匮乏地区通过有意义的利益相关者参与实现循证外科系统强化:对近期评论的回应
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8387. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.8387. Epub 2024 Jan 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Post-decolonisation: Global Health and Global Surgery's Coming of Age.后殖民时代:全球健康与全球外科的成熟
Indian J Surg. 2022 Apr;84(2):259-261. doi: 10.1007/s12262-022-03330-6. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
2
Decolonizing global health: what should be the target of this movement and where does it lead us?去殖民化全球健康:这场运动的目标应该是什么,它将把我们带向何方?
Glob Health Res Policy. 2022 Jan 24;7(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41256-022-00237-3.
3
Epistemic injustice in academic global health.学术全球健康中的认知不公正。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Oct;9(10):e1465-e1470. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00301-6. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
4
Which Surgical Operations Should be Performed in District Hospitals in East, Central and Southern Africa? Results of a Survey of Regional Clinicians.在东非、中非和南非,地区医院应开展哪些外科手术?对区域临床医生的调查结果。
World J Surg. 2021 Feb;45(2):369-377. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05793-8. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
5
Effectiveness of a multicomponent safe surgery intervention on improving surgical quality in Tanzania's Lake Zone: protocol for a quasi-experimental study.多组分安全手术干预提高坦桑尼亚湖区手术质量的效果:一项准实验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e031800. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031800.
6
The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia-a randomised controlled trial.赞比亚农村地区非医师临床医生提供手术服务的贡献:一项随机对照试验。
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Jul 22;17(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0398-9.
7
Global Surgery Priorities: A Response to Recent Commentaries.全球外科手术重点:对近期评论的回应
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 Jun 1;8(6):381-383. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.10.
8
Adult Learning Theories in Context: A Quick Guide for Healthcare Professional Educators.情境中的成人学习理论:医疗专业教育工作者快速指南
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2019 Apr 10;6:2382120519840332. doi: 10.1177/2382120519840332. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
9
Evaluation of a surgical supervision model in three African countries-protocol for a prospective mixed-methods controlled pilot trial.三个非洲国家手术监督模式的评估——一项前瞻性混合方法对照试验的方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Feb 18;5:25. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0409-6. eCollection 2019.
10
Social impact of participatory health research: collaborative non-linear processes of knowledge mobilization.参与式健康研究的社会影响:知识动员的协作式非线性过程
Educ Action Res. 2017;25(4):489-505. doi: 10.1080/09650792.2017.1329092. Epub 2017 May 25.