Suppr超能文献

在PROSPR-肺癌联盟中,经医疗服务提供者开具筛查医嘱后肺癌筛查CT的接受情况。

Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening CT After a Provider Order for Screening in the PROSPR-Lung Consortium.

作者信息

Neslund-Dudas Christine, Tang Amy, Alleman Elizabeth, Zarins Katie R, Li Pin, Simoff Michael J, Lafata Jennifer Elston, Rendle Katharine A, Hartman Andrea N Burnett, Honda Stacey A, Oshiro Caryn, Olaiya Oluwatosin, Greenlee Robert T, Vachani Anil, Ritzwoller Debra P

机构信息

Henry Ford Health System and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.

Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, One Ford Place, Suite 3E, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Feb;39(2):186-194. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08408-9. Epub 2023 Oct 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Uptake of lung cancer screening (LCS) has been slow with less than 20% of eligible people who currently or formerly smoked reported to have undergone a screening CT.

OBJECTIVE

To determine individual-, health system-, and neighborhood-level factors associated with LCS uptake after a provider order for screening.

DESIGN AND SUBJECTS

We conducted an observational cohort study of screening-eligible patients within the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process (PROSPR)-Lung Consortium who received a radiology referral/order for a baseline low-dose screening CT (LDCT) from a healthcare provider between January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019.

MAIN MEASURES

The primary outcome is screening uptake, defined as LCS-LDCT completion within 90 days of the screening order date.

KEY RESULTS

During the study period, 18,294 patients received their first order for LCS-LDCT. Orders more than doubled from the beginning to the end of the study period. Overall, 60% of patients completed screening after receiving their first LCS-LDCT order. Across health systems, uptake varied from 41 to 87%. In both univariate and multivariable analyses, older age, male sex, former smoking status, COPD, and receiving care in a centralized LCS program were positively associated with completing LCS-LDCT. Unknown insurance status, other or unknown race, and lower neighborhood socioeconomic status, as measured by the Yost Index, were negatively associated with screening uptake.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 40% of patients referred for LCS did not complete a LDCT within 90 days, highlighting a substantial gap in the lung screening care pathway, particularly in decentralized screening programs.

摘要

背景

肺癌筛查(LCS)的普及速度缓慢,据报道,目前或曾经吸烟的符合条件人群中,接受筛查CT的比例不到20%。

目的

确定在医生开出筛查医嘱后,与肺癌筛查普及相关的个体、卫生系统和社区层面因素。

设计与研究对象

我们对基于人群的优化筛查流程研究(PROSPR)-肺癌联盟中符合筛查条件的患者进行了一项观察性队列研究,这些患者在2015年1月1日至2019年6月30日期间从医疗服务提供者处收到了基线低剂量筛查CT(LDCT)的放射学转诊/医嘱。

主要测量指标

主要结局是筛查接受情况,定义为在筛查医嘱日期后的90天内完成肺癌筛查-LDCT。

关键结果

在研究期间,18294名患者收到了他们的第一份肺癌筛查-LDCT医嘱。从研究期开始到结束,医嘱数量增加了一倍多。总体而言,60%的患者在收到第一份肺癌筛查-LDCT医嘱后完成了筛查。在各个卫生系统中,接受率从41%到87%不等。在单变量和多变量分析中,年龄较大、男性、曾经吸烟状态、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)以及在集中式肺癌筛查项目中接受治疗与完成肺癌筛查-LDCT呈正相关。未知的保险状态、其他或未知种族以及用约斯特指数衡量的较低社区社会经济地位与筛查接受率呈负相关。

结论

总体而言,40%被转诊进行肺癌筛查的患者在90天内未完成LDCT,这凸显了肺癌筛查护理路径中存在的巨大差距,尤其是在分散式筛查项目中。

相似文献

1
Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening CT After a Provider Order for Screening in the PROSPR-Lung Consortium.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Feb;39(2):186-194. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08408-9. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
4
Lung Cancer Screening by Race and Ethnicity in an Integrated Health System in Hawaii.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2144381. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44381.
5
Racial Disparities in Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening and Recommended Follow-Up Care: A Multicenter Cohort Study.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Sep;19(9):1561-1569. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202111-1253OC.
6
Evaluating Lung Cancer Screening Across Diverse Healthcare Systems: A Process Model from the Lung PROSPR Consortium.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Feb;13(2):129-136. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0378. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
8
Barriers and Facilitators Impacting Lung Cancer Screening Uptake Among Black Veterans: A Qualitative Study.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024 Apr 18;22(4):231-236. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7098.
9
Real-world Clinical Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening-Evaluating Processes to Improve Screening Guidelines-Concordance.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1143-1152. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05539-w. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening and Rates of Cancer Diagnosis.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250942. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0942.
2
Implementing a Tribally Engaged Lung Cancer Screening Pilot Program in Rural Oklahoma.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2025 Jul 1;18(7):423-430. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0348.

本文引用的文献

1
Individuals Eligible for Lung Cancer Screening Less Likely to Receive Screening When Enrolled in Health Plans With Deductibles.
Med Care. 2023 Oct 1;61(10):665-673. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001903. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
2
National Survey of Lung Cancer Screening Practices in Veterans Health Administration Facilities.
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Nov;65(5):901-905. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 9.
3
Tobacco Product Use Among Adults - United States, 2021.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023 May 5;72(18):475-483. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7218a1.
4
Stage Migration and Lung Cancer Incidence After Initiation of Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening.
J Thorac Oncol. 2022 Dec;17(12):1355-1364. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.08.011. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
5
Factors Associated With Declining Lung Cancer Screening After Discussion With a Physician in a Cohort of US Veterans.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2227126. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.27126.
6
Racial Disparities in Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening and Recommended Follow-Up Care: A Multicenter Cohort Study.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Sep;19(9):1561-1569. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202111-1253OC.
8
Guideline-Recommended Lung Cancer Screening Adherence Is Superior With a Centralized Approach.
Chest. 2022 Mar;161(3):818-825. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
9
Financial hardship is associated with lower uptake of colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screenings.
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Oct;32(10):1173-1183. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01465-7. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
10
A comparison of two neighborhood-level socioeconomic indexes in the United States.
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;37:100412. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2021.100412. Epub 2021 Feb 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验