• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有保险免赔额的健康计划覆盖人群,接受肺癌筛查的比例更低。

Individuals Eligible for Lung Cancer Screening Less Likely to Receive Screening When Enrolled in Health Plans With Deductibles.

机构信息

Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, CO.

Center for Integrated Healthcare Research, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii.

出版信息

Med Care. 2023 Oct 1;61(10):665-673. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001903. Epub 2023 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001903
PMID:37582296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10840830/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and commercial insurance plans began covering lung cancer screening (LCS) without patient cost-sharing for all plans. We explore the impact of enrolling into a deductible plan on the utilization of LCS services despite having no out-of-pocket cost requirement.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data from the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process Lung Consortium. Our cohort included non-Medicare LCS-eligible individuals enrolled in managed care organizations between February 5, 2015, and February 28, 2019. We estimate a series of sequential logistic regression models examining utilization across the sequence of events required for baseline LCS. We report the marginal effects of enrollment into deductible plans compared with enrollment in no-deductible plans.

RESULTS

The total effect of deductible plan enrollment was a 1.8 percentage-point (PP) decrease in baseline LCS. Sequential logistic regression results that explore each transition separately indicate deductible plan enrollment was associated with a 4.3 PP decrease in receipt of clinician visit, a 1.7 PP decrease in receipt of LCS order, and a 7.0 PP decrease in receipt of baseline LCS. Reductions persisted across all observable races and ethnicities.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest individuals enrolled in deductible plans are more likely to forgo preventive LCS services despite requiring no out-of-pocket costs. This result may indicate that increased cost-sharing is associated with suboptimal choices to forgo recommended LCS. Alternatively, this effect may indicate individuals enrolling into deductible plans prefer less health care utilization. Patient outreach interventions at the health plan level may improve LCS.

摘要

背景

2015 年,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心和商业保险公司开始为所有计划提供肺癌筛查(LCS),而无需患者自付费用。我们探讨了尽管没有自付费用要求,但加入免赔额计划对 LCS 服务利用的影响。

方法

这项回顾性研究分析了基于人群的优化筛查过程肺联盟的数据。我们的队列包括 2015 年 2 月 5 日至 2019 年 2 月 28 日期间参加管理式医疗组织的非医疗保险 LCS 合格个体。我们估计了一系列顺序逻辑回归模型,检查了基线 LCS 所需事件序列中的利用情况。我们报告了与无免赔额计划相比,加入免赔额计划的边际效应。

结果

免赔额计划的加入总效应是基线 LCS 利用减少 1.8 个百分点。单独探索每个转变的顺序逻辑回归结果表明,免赔额计划的加入与临床医生就诊的接受率降低了 4.3 个百分点,LCS 订单的接受率降低了 1.7 个百分点,基线 LCS 的接受率降低了 7.0 个百分点。这种减少在所有可观察到的种族和族裔中都存在。

结论

这些发现表明,尽管没有自付费用,但加入免赔额计划的个体更有可能放弃预防性 LCS 服务。这一结果可能表明,增加自付费用与放弃推荐的 LCS 有关。或者,这种影响可能表明,加入免赔额计划的个体更喜欢减少医疗保健的利用。在健康计划层面进行患者外联干预可能会改善 LCS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a0/10840830/166c542fbcf6/nihms-1916694-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a0/10840830/f74cb610ea72/nihms-1916694-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a0/10840830/c7a8cd84a37b/nihms-1916694-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a0/10840830/8823774d6136/nihms-1916694-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a0/10840830/166c542fbcf6/nihms-1916694-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a0/10840830/f74cb610ea72/nihms-1916694-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a0/10840830/c7a8cd84a37b/nihms-1916694-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a0/10840830/8823774d6136/nihms-1916694-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a0/10840830/166c542fbcf6/nihms-1916694-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Individuals Eligible for Lung Cancer Screening Less Likely to Receive Screening When Enrolled in Health Plans With Deductibles.有保险免赔额的健康计划覆盖人群,接受肺癌筛查的比例更低。
Med Care. 2023 Oct 1;61(10):665-673. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001903. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
2
Out-of-Pocket Costs and Outpatient Visits Among Patients With Cancer in High-Deductible Health Plans.高自付额健康计划中癌症患者的自付费用和门诊就诊情况。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Mar 1;10(3):390-394. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6052.
3
How Have Patient Out-of-pocket Costs for Common Outpatient Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgical Procedures Changed Over Time? A Retrospective Study From 2010 to 2020.常见门诊骨科足部和踝关节手术患者自付费用是如何随时间变化的?一项 2010 年至 2020 年的回顾性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Feb 1;482(2):313-322. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002772. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
4
Are Quality Scores in the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services Merit-based Incentive Payment System Associated With Outcomes After Outpatient Orthopaedic Surgery?医疗补助与医疗照顾服务中心基于绩效的激励支付系统中的质量评分与门诊骨科手术后的结果相关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1107-1116. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003033. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
5
Reducing Smoking Requirements for Lung Screening to Address Health Disparities in a Community Cohort.降低肺部筛查的吸烟要求以解决社区队列中的健康差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2517149. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17149.
6
Transition of care for adolescents from paediatric services to adult health services.青少年医疗护理从儿科服务向成人健康服务的过渡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 29;4(4):CD009794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009794.pub2.
7
Homelessness, Patient Navigation, and Lung Cancer Screening in a Health Center Setting: A Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.健康中心环境下的无家可归、患者导航与肺癌筛查:一项随机临床试验的亚组分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2519780. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.19780.
8
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
9
Delivery of intravenous anti-cancer therapy at home versus in hospital or community settings for adults with cancer.成年癌症患者在家中与在医院或社区环境中接受静脉抗癌治疗的情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 22;4(4):CD014861. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014861.pub2.
10
Medicaid Spending in Coordination-Only Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans.仅协调的双重资格特殊需求计划中的医疗补助支出。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2455461. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55461.

引用本文的文献

1
Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening CT After a Provider Order for Screening in the PROSPR-Lung Consortium.在PROSPR-肺癌联盟中,经医疗服务提供者开具筛查医嘱后肺癌筛查CT的接受情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Feb;39(2):186-194. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08408-9. Epub 2023 Oct 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Percentage Up to Date With Chest Computed Tomography Among Those Eligible for Lung Cancer Screening.符合肺癌筛查条件者中接受胸部计算机断层扫描的比例。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Jul;65(1):126-130. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
2
The Impact of Financial Assistance Programs on Health Care Utilization: Evidence from Kaiser Permanente.经济援助计划对医疗保健利用的影响:来自凯撒医疗集团的证据
Am Econ Rev Insights. 2022 Sep;4(3):389-407. doi: 10.1257/aeri.20210515.
3
Stage Migration and Lung Cancer Incidence After Initiation of Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening.
启动低剂量 CT 筛查后肺癌发病率的阶段迁移。
J Thorac Oncol. 2022 Dec;17(12):1355-1364. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.08.011. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
4
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, Part 2: Patient Economic Burden Associated With Cancer Care.《国家癌症报告:第二部分:癌症护理相关患者经济负担》
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 29;113(12):1670-1682. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab192.
5
Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility and Screening Patterns Among Black and White Adults in the United States.美国黑人和白人成年人的肺癌筛查资格和筛查模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2130350. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.30350.
6
Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):962-970. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1117.
7
Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.用低剂量计算机断层扫描进行肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):971-987. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0377.
8
Real-world Clinical Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening-Evaluating Processes to Improve Screening Guidelines-Concordance.肺癌筛查的真实世界临床实施——评估改善筛查指南一致性的流程
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1143-1152. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05539-w. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
9
Lung Cancer Screening Uptake in the United States.美国肺癌筛查的接受情况。
Chest. 2020 Jan;157(1):236-238. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.08.2176.
10
Evaluating Lung Cancer Screening Across Diverse Healthcare Systems: A Process Model from the Lung PROSPR Consortium.评估不同医疗体系中的肺癌筛查:来自 Lung PROSPR 联盟的过程模型。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Feb;13(2):129-136. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0378. Epub 2019 Dec 23.