Baron Frédéric, Nagler Arnon, Galimard Jacques-Emmanuel, Sanz Jaime, Versluis Jurjen, Forcade Edouard, Chevallier Patrice, Sirvent Anne, Anthias Chloe, Kuball Jürgen, Furst Sabine, Rambaldi Alessandro, Sierra Jorge, von dem Borne Peter A, Gallego Hernanz Maria Pilar, Cluzeau Thomas, Robinson Stephen, Raiola Anna Maria, Labussière-Wallet Hélène, Byrne Jenny L, Malfuson Jean-Valère, Ruggeri Annalisa, Mohty Mohamad, Ciceri Fabio
GIGA-I3, Université de Liège et CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Division of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Br J Haematol. 2024 Jan;204(1):250-259. doi: 10.1111/bjh.19130. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
We investigated whether secondary versus de novo acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) would be associated with poor outcomes in adult acute AML patients in first complete remission (CR1) receiving unrelated cord blood transplantation (CBT). This is a retrospective study from the acute leukaemia working party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Inclusion criteria included adult at first allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation between 2000 and 2021, unrelated single or double unit CBT, AML in CR1, no ex vivo T-cell depletion and no post-transplant cyclophosphamide. The primary end-point of the study was leukaemia-free survival (LFS). A total of 879 patients with de novo (n = 696) or secondary (n = 183) AML met the inclusion criteria. In multivariable analyses, sAML patients had non-significantly different LFS (HR = 0.98, p = 0.86), overall survival (HR = 1.07, p = 0.58), relapse incidence (HR = 0.74, p = 0.09) and non-relapse mortality (HR = 1.26, p = 0.13) than those with de novo AML. Our results demonstrate non-significantly different LFS following CBT in adult patients with secondary versus de novo AML.
我们调查了继发性与原发性急性髓系白血病(AML)是否会使接受非亲缘脐血移植(CBT)且处于首次完全缓解期(CR1)的成年急性AML患者预后不良。这是一项来自欧洲血液与骨髓移植学会急性白血病工作组的回顾性研究。纳入标准包括2000年至2021年间首次进行异基因造血细胞移植的成年人、非亲缘单单位或双单位CBT、处于CR1期的AML、未进行体外T细胞去除以及未使用移植后环磷酰胺。该研究的主要终点是无白血病生存期(LFS)。共有879例原发性(n = 696)或继发性(n = 183)AML患者符合纳入标准。在多变量分析中,与原发性AML患者相比,继发性AML患者的LFS(风险比[HR]=0.98,p = 0.86)、总生存期(HR = 1.07,p = 0.58)、复发率(HR = 0.74,p = 0.09)和非复发死亡率(HR = 1.26,p = 0.13)无显著差异。我们的结果表明,继发性与原发性AML成年患者接受CBT后的LFS无显著差异。