• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典20世纪90年代通过筛查确定的青光眼患者与21世纪10年代常规临床护理中确定的青光眼患者疾病严重程度的比较。

Comparison of disease severity in glaucoma patients identified by screening in the 1990s and in routine clinical care in the 2010s in Sweden.

作者信息

Bengtsson B, Villalba C, Peters D, Aspberg J

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, Ophthalmology in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Department of Ophthalmology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar;102(2):238-245. doi: 10.1111/aos.15777. Epub 2023 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1111/aos.15777
PMID:37786298
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In a previous study comparing the amount of visual field damage at presentation in patients having open-angle glaucoma (OAG) identified through screening and in patients diagnosed in routine clinical practice in the 1990s, the damage was considerably worse in the clinically diagnosed patients. In the present study we compare visual field damage at presentation in the same 402 screened patients with that seen in 281 newly detected previously untreated patients clinically diagnosed in the 2010s.

METHODS

The perimetric visual field index mean deviation (MD) was compared in the two groups of patients.

RESULTS

In the clinical patients diagnosed with bilateral visual field damage the median MD was -5.1 dB in the better eye and -13.0 dB in the worse eye. In the screened patients the median MD in the better eye was -6.5 dB and -11.5 dB in the worse eye. The differences between the clinical and screened patients were non-significant, p = 0.28 and p = 0.67 respectively. More clinical patients had severe visual field loss, defined as MD less than -20 dB, in the worse eye than in the screened patients, 18.5% versus 12.7% respectively, p = 0.037.

CONCLUSION

The visual field damage at presentation in clinically diagnosed OAG patients has improved in the past 20 years, but the proportion of patients with severe visual field loss in at least one eye, almost 20%, is still unacceptably high considering that severe visual field damage at presentation is the most important risk factor for later development of glaucoma blindness.

摘要

背景与目的

在之前一项研究中,比较了通过筛查确诊的开角型青光眼(OAG)患者与20世纪90年代在常规临床实践中确诊的患者就诊时的视野损害程度,结果发现临床确诊患者的损害要严重得多。在本研究中,我们将这402名经筛查的患者就诊时的视野损害情况与281名2010年代临床确诊的新发现且未经治疗的患者的视野损害情况进行了比较。

方法

比较两组患者的视野平均缺损(MD)。

结果

在临床诊断为双侧视野损害的患者中,较好眼的MD中位数为-5.1dB,较差眼为-13.0dB。在经筛查的患者中,较好眼的MD中位数为-6.5dB,较差眼为-11.5dB。临床患者与经筛查患者之间的差异无统计学意义,p值分别为0.28和0.67。较差眼中有更多临床患者出现严重视野缺损(定义为MD小于-20dB),分别为18.5%和12.7%,p = 0.037。

结论

在过去20年中,临床诊断的OAG患者就诊时的视野损害有所改善,但考虑到就诊时严重视野损害是青光眼致盲后期发展的最重要危险因素,至少一只眼出现严重视野缺损的患者比例近20%,仍然高得令人无法接受。

相似文献

1
Comparison of disease severity in glaucoma patients identified by screening in the 1990s and in routine clinical care in the 2010s in Sweden.瑞典20世纪90年代通过筛查确定的青光眼患者与21世纪10年代常规临床护理中确定的青光眼患者疾病严重程度的比较。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar;102(2):238-245. doi: 10.1111/aos.15777. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
2
A comparison of glaucoma patients identified through mass screening and in routine clinical practice.通过大规模筛查和常规临床实践确诊的青光眼患者的比较。
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002 Dec;80(6):627-31. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2002.800613.x.
3
Correlation of visual field progression between eyes in patients with open-angle glaucoma.开角型青光眼患者双眼视野进展的相关性
Ophthalmology. 2002 Nov;109(11):2093-9. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01241-1.
4
SHORT TERM EVALUATION OF PERIMETRIC PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA AND DIABETES.开角型青光眼合并糖尿病患者视野进展的短期评估
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2016 Jan-Mar;120(1):83-9.
5
Progression of visual field in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma - ProgF study 1.原发性开角型青光眼患者视野进展 - ProgF研究1
Acta Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;93(8):e615-20. doi: 10.1111/aos.12788. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
6
Long-term Impact of Immediate Versus Delayed Treatment of Early Glaucoma: Results From the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial.早期显性青光眼试验:即时治疗与延迟治疗早期青光眼的长期影响。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug;252:286-294. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.04.010. Epub 2023 May 2.
7
Relationship between severity of visual field loss at presentation and rate of visual field progression in glaucoma.视野丧失严重程度与青光眼视野进展速度的关系。
Ophthalmology. 2011 Feb;118(2):249-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.05.027. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
8
Comparison of visual field progression in new-diagnosed primary open-angle and exfoliation glaucoma patients in Sweden.瑞典原发性开角型和剥脱性青光眼患者新诊断时视野进展的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug 5;20(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01592-w.
9
Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus drops for newly diagnosed ocular hypertension and glaucoma: the LiGHT RCT.选择性激光小梁成形术与滴眼液治疗新发眼压升高和青光眼的比较:LiGHT RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jun;23(31):1-102. doi: 10.3310/hta23310.
10
Comparison of Rates of Fast and Catastrophic Visual Field Loss in Three Glaucoma Subtypes.三种青光眼亚型中快速和灾难性视野丧失发生率的比较。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Jan 2;60(1):161-167. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-25391.

引用本文的文献

1
Optometrists' Assessment of Pseudoexfoliation and Its Impact on Glaucoma Referrals.验光师对假性剥脱的评估及其对青光眼转诊的影响。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 30;19:1111-1118. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S505365. eCollection 2025.