Suppr超能文献

优化随访结肠镜检查的时间:知识转化工具的试点聚类随机试验。

Optimizing Timing of Follow-Up Colonoscopy: A Pilot Cluster Randomized Trial of a Knowledge Translation Tool.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Paul Albrechtsen Research Institute Cancer, Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 1;119(3):547-555. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002542. Epub 2023 Oct 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopists have low adherence to guideline-recommended colonoscopy surveillance intervals. We performed a cluster-randomized single-blind pilot trial in Winnipeg, Canada, to assess the effectiveness of a newly developed digital application tool that computes guideline-recommended follow-up intervals.

METHODS

Participant endoscopists were randomized to either receive access to the digital application (intervention group) or not receive access (control group). Pathology reports and final recommendations for colonoscopies performed in the 1-4 months before randomization and 3-7 months postrandomization were extracted. Generalized estimating equation models were used to determine whether the access to the digital application predicted guideline congruence.

RESULTS

We included 15 endoscopists in the intervention group and 14 in the control group (of 42 eligible endoscopists in the city), with 343 patients undergoing colonoscopy before randomization and 311 postrandomization. Endoscopists who received the application made guideline-congruent recommendations 67.6% of the time before randomization and 76.1% of the time after randomization. Endoscopists in the control group made guideline-congruent recommendations 72.4% and 72.9% of the time before and after randomization, respectively. Endoscopists in the intervention group trended to have an increase in guideline adherence comparing postintervention with preintervention (odds ratio [OR]: 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-2.74). By contrast, the control group had no change in guideline adherence (OR: 1.07, 95% CI 0.50-2.29). Endoscopists in the intervention group with less than median guideline congruence prerandomization had a significant increase in guideline-congruent recommendations postrandomization.

DISCUSSION

An application that provides colonoscopy surveillance intervals may help endoscopists with guideline congruence, especially those with a lower preintervention congruence with guideline recommendations ( ClincialTrials.gov number, NCT04889352).

摘要

背景

内镜医生遵循指南推荐的结肠镜检查监测间隔的比例较低。我们在加拿大温尼伯进行了一项集群随机单盲试点试验,以评估一种新开发的数字应用工具的有效性,该工具可计算出指南推荐的随访间隔。

方法

将参与研究的内镜医生随机分为使用数字应用工具组(干预组)或不使用数字应用工具组(对照组)。提取随机分组前 1-4 个月和随机分组后 3-7 个月的病理报告和结肠镜检查的最终建议。使用广义估计方程模型确定是否使用数字应用工具可预测与指南的一致性。

结果

我们纳入了干预组的 15 名内镜医生和对照组的 14 名内镜医生(该市 42 名符合条件的内镜医生中的),共有 343 名患者在随机分组前进行了结肠镜检查,311 名患者在随机分组后进行了结肠镜检查。在随机分组前,使用数字应用工具的内镜医生做出符合指南的建议的比例为 67.6%,随机分组后为 76.1%。对照组内镜医生在随机分组前和后做出符合指南的建议的比例分别为 72.4%和 72.9%。干预组的内镜医生在与干预后相比,在指南依从性方面呈上升趋势(比值比[OR]:1.50,95%置信区间[CI]:0.82-2.74)。相比之下,对照组的指南依从性没有变化(OR:1.07,95%CI:0.50-2.29)。随机分组前指南一致性低于中位数的干预组内镜医生,在随机分组后做出符合指南的建议的比例显著增加。

讨论

提供结肠镜检查监测间隔的应用程序可能有助于内镜医生遵循指南,特别是对于那些与指南建议一致性较低的内镜医生(临床试验编号:NCT04889352)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验