Suppr超能文献

碳水化合物计数与固定膳食计划在印度 1 型糖尿病儿童中的应用:一项随机对照试验。

Carbohydrate Counting vs. Fixed Meal Plan in Indian Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Mother and Child Block, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, 110029, India.

Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Pediatr. 2024 Dec;91(12):1232-1237. doi: 10.1007/s12098-023-04850-z. Epub 2023 Oct 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To study the impact of carbohydrate counting vs. fixed-meal plan on glycemic control, quality of life (QoL) and diabetes-related emotional distress in children with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).

METHODS

Children aged 6-18 y with T1DM of duration >1 y were eligible for the study if they were on multiple daily injections of insulin and regularly monitoring blood glucose. Those with celiac disease, hypothyroidism, any underlying chronic renal/liver/systemic disease or HbA1c >13% were excluded. Both groups received education on diabetes management and healthy diet. In the intervention arm, parents were taught to quantify carbohydrate content and modify insulin doses according to insulin-carbohydrate ratio. The control arm had dietary prescription according to recommended dietary allowance and food exchange list. Standard validated questionnaires were used to assess the QoL and emotional distress related to diabetes.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty five patients (61 intervention, 64 controls) were enrolled and 91.8% and 84.3%, respectively, completed 6-mo follow-up. There was a reduction in HbA1c in both the groups, but was not statistically significant within or between groups {Intervention: 8.9 (1.4) to 8.6 (1.5) vs. control: 9.1 (1.6) to 8.8 (1.9), [95% CI 8.3-9.3 vs. 8.3-9.0, intention to treat (ITT), p = 0.63]}. There was a significant reduction in diabetes distress in the intervention group; DAWN Problem Areas in Diabetes Questionnaire (PAID) score with a median (interquartile range) of 21 (11-33) vs. control: 27 (20-40), (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in the carbohydrate-counting group demonstrated lower diabetes distress scores and less emotional burnout compared to fixed-meal plan over a 6 mo period though overall glycemic control was comparable between groups.

摘要

目的

研究碳水化合物计数与固定膳食计划对 1 型糖尿病(T1DM)儿童血糖控制、生活质量(QoL)和糖尿病相关情绪困扰的影响。

方法

患有 T1DM 超过 1 年且正在接受多次胰岛素注射和定期血糖监测的 6-18 岁儿童符合研究条件。患有乳糜泻、甲状腺功能减退症、任何潜在的慢性肾/肝/全身疾病或糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)>13%的儿童被排除在外。两组均接受糖尿病管理和健康饮食教育。在干预组中,父母接受了量化碳水化合物含量并根据胰岛素-碳水化合物比例调整胰岛素剂量的教育。对照组则根据推荐的饮食允许量和食物交换清单进行饮食处方。使用标准的经过验证的问卷评估与糖尿病相关的 QoL 和情绪困扰。

结果

共纳入 125 名患者(61 名干预组,64 名对照组),分别有 91.8%和 84.3%的患者完成了 6 个月的随访。两组的 HbA1c 均有所下降,但组内和组间均无统计学意义[干预组:8.9(1.4)降至 8.6(1.5);对照组:9.1(1.6)降至 8.8(1.9);[95%可信区间(CI):8.3-9.3 与 8.3-9.0,意向治疗(ITT),p=0.63]。干预组糖尿病困扰显著减轻;糖尿病困扰问卷(DAWN)的问题领域(PAID)评分中位数(四分位距)从 21(11-33)降至 27(20-40),(p=0.04)。

结论

与固定膳食计划相比,在 6 个月的时间内,进行碳水化合物计数的患者在糖尿病困扰评分较低,情绪倦怠较少,尽管两组之间的总体血糖控制相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验