文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

碳水化合物计数法对1型和2型糖尿病患者的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of carbohydrate counting in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Sakane Naoki, Domichi Masayuki, Suganuma Akiko

机构信息

Division of Preventive Medicine, Clinical Research Institute, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, 1-1Mukaihata-cho, Fukakusa, Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, 612-8555 Japan.

出版信息

Diabetol Int. 2025 Apr 10;16(3):546-558. doi: 10.1007/s13340-025-00810-4. eCollection 2025 Jul.


DOI:10.1007/s13340-025-00810-4
PMID:40607153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12209165/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although carbohydrate counting (CC) being the recommended dietary strategy for achieving glycemic control in people with diabetes, there is limited evidence. Our aim is to systematically assess the efficacy of CC in people with diabetes. METHODS: We searched PubMed up to October 2024 and assessed randomized controlled trials of interventions longer than 12 weeks in people with diabetes. Change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels was the primary outcome. The results of clinically and statistically homogenous studies were pooled and meta-analyzed using the random-effects model to provide estimates of the efficacy of CC. RESULTS: We identified 16 studies (633 children and 640 adults) in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and 6 studies (966 adults) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). There was significant improvement in HbA1c levels with CC versus the other diets in T1DM (- 0.21%, 95% CI - 0.41 to - 0.01;  = 0.042) with large heterogeneity (I2 = 85.2%) in people with T1DM. In subgroup analyses, advanced CC (ACC) showed improved HbA1c levels (- 0.47%, 95% CI - 0.78 to - 0.15;  = 0.004) in adults with T1DM, but ACC did not in children with T1DM (- 0.07%, 95% CI - 0.25 to 0.10;  = 0.419). The effects of basic CC (BCC) on glycemic control for children with T1DM were not significant. Additionally, BCC did not show improved HbA1c levels in in adults with T2DM. CONCLUSIONS: For glycemic control in people with T1DM, CC was an effective option. Although BCC was not effective for glycemic control in adults with T2DM, further high-quality and long-term studies are needed to confirm these issues.

摘要

背景:尽管碳水化合物计数法(CC)是糖尿病患者实现血糖控制的推荐饮食策略,但相关证据有限。我们的目的是系统评估CC对糖尿病患者的疗效。 方法:检索截至2024年10月的PubMed,并评估糖尿病患者中干预时间超过12周的随机对照试验。糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平的变化是主要结局。对临床和统计学上同质的研究结果进行汇总,并使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,以提供CC疗效的估计值。 结果:我们在1型糖尿病(T1DM)中确定了16项研究(633名儿童和640名成人),在2型糖尿病(T2DM)中确定了6项研究(966名成人)。与其他饮食相比,T1DM患者采用CC后HbA1c水平有显著改善(-0.21%,95%CI -0.41至-0.01;P = 0.042),但T1DM患者存在较大异质性(I2 = 85.2%)。在亚组分析中,成人T1DM患者采用强化碳水化合物计数法(ACC)后HbA1c水平有所改善(-0.47%,95%CI -0.78至-0.15;P = 0.004),但儿童T1DM患者采用ACC后HbA1c水平未改善(-0.07%,95%CI -0.25至0.10;P = 0.419)。基础碳水化合物计数法(BCC)对T1DM儿童血糖控制的效果不显著。此外,BCC在T2DM成人患者中未显示HbA1c水平改善。 结论:对于T1DM患者的血糖控制,CC是一种有效的选择。虽然BCC对T2DM成人患者的血糖控制无效,但需要进一步的高质量长期研究来证实这些问题。

相似文献

[1]
Efficacy of carbohydrate counting in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Diabetol Int. 2025-4-10

[2]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19

[3]
Psychological interventions for diabetes-related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-9-27

[4]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9

[5]
Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-12-12

[6]
Dipeptidyl-peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 analogues for prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its associated complications in people at increased risk for the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-5-10

[7]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22

[8]
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.

Health Technol Assess. 2024-10

[9]
Continuous glucose monitoring systems for type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-1-18

[10]
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-5-31

本文引用的文献

[1]
Effects of basic carbohydrate counting versus standard dietary care for glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes (The BCC Study): a randomised, controlled trial.

Nutr Diabetes. 2024-6-27

[2]
Twelve-Month Follow-up from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Simplified Meal Announcement Versus Precise Carbohydrate Counting in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Using the MiniMed™ 780G Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System.

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024-3

[3]
Basic carbohydrate counting and glycemia in young people with type 1 diabetes in India: A randomized controlled trial.

Nutrition. 2024-3

[4]
The Impact of Using Carbohydrate Counting on Managing Diabetic Patients: A Review.

Cureus. 2023-11-18

[5]
Optimization of nutritional strategies using a mechanistic computational model in prediabetes: Application to the J-DOIT1 study data.

PLoS One. 2023-11-30

[6]
Carbohydrate counting implementation on pediatric type 1 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2023-9

[7]
Carbohydrate Counting vs. Fixed Meal Plan in Indian Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Indian J Pediatr. 2024-12

[8]
Nutrition education to type 1 diabetes patients: few changes over the time.

Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2023-8-29

[9]
Unannounced Meal Challenges Using an Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System.

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023-9

[10]
A Randomized Crossover Trial to Compare Automated Insulin Delivery (the Artificial Pancreas) With Carbohydrate Counting or Simplified Qualitative Meal-Size Estimation in Type 1 Diabetes.

Diabetes Care. 2023-7-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索