Suppr超能文献

右美托咪定与瑞芬太尼在玻璃体切除术中镇静效果的比较:一项回顾性研究

Comparison of the Sedative Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Vitrectomy Surgery: A Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Kuvvet Yoldaş Tuba, Gümüş Nevin Esra

机构信息

Clinic of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, TUR.

Clinic of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Samsun, TUR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Sep 29;15(9):e46204. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46204. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Background Vitrectomy surgery is a painful and lengthy procedure. Therefore, administering sedation to reduce patient agitation provides both surgical comfort and hemodynamic stability. However, various complications can arise during the perioperative period depending on the sedation agent used. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil sedation applications on patient hemodynamics and perioperative complications in vitrectomy surgery. Methods Our retrospective study included patients aged 18-70 who underwent vitrectomy surgery between 2021 and 2022 with complete file data and ASA scores of 1-3 after obtaining approval from our hospital's ethics committee. Patients were classified into two groups based on the sedation agent used: Group D for dexmedetomidine and Group R for remifentanil. Demographic data of patients, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation, and bispectral index values during perioperative monitoring, operation duration, and complications such as perioperative nausea, vomiting, and low saturation were recorded. The data of both groups were statistically evaluated, with p<0.05 values considered statistically significant. Results Because of missing data in 18 out of 58 patient files, these cases were excluded from the study. A total of 40 patients were included in the study, with 20 in Group D and 20 in Group R. The mean age of the patients was 64. Among them, 18 (45%) were male, and 22 (55%) were female. The mean operation duration was 61.8 ± 24.1 minutes in Group D and 56.3 ± 17.2 minutes in Group R. The heart rate in Group D was statistically significantly lower than in Group R, starting from the 20th minute of the perioperative period. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation, and bispectral index values. One case of bradycardia occurred in Group D, requiring intervention. Conclusion In vitrectomy surgery, both dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusions can be used for sedation, but caution is advised regarding bradycardia in Group D. Anticipating potential complications with an experienced anesthesia team is crucial for both patient and surgical comfort.

摘要

背景

玻璃体切除术是一种痛苦且耗时的手术。因此,给予镇静以减少患者躁动可提供手术舒适度并维持血流动力学稳定。然而,根据所使用的镇静剂不同,围手术期可能会出现各种并发症。在我们的研究中,我们旨在评估右美托咪定和瑞芬太尼镇静应用对玻璃体切除术患者血流动力学及围手术期并发症的影响。

方法

我们的回顾性研究纳入了2021年至2022年间接受玻璃体切除术的18至70岁患者,这些患者在获得我院伦理委员会批准后,拥有完整的病历数据且ASA评分为1至3级。根据所使用的镇静剂将患者分为两组:右美托咪定组(D组)和瑞芬太尼组(R组)。记录患者的人口统计学数据、围手术期监测期间的心率、平均动脉压、血氧饱和度和脑电双频指数值、手术时长以及围手术期恶心、呕吐和低氧饱和度等并发症情况。对两组数据进行统计学评估,p<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

由于58份患者病历中有18份存在数据缺失,这些病例被排除在研究之外。共有40例患者纳入研究,其中D组20例,R组20例。患者的平均年龄为64岁。其中,18例(45%)为男性,22例(55%)为女性。D组的平均手术时长为61.8±24.1分钟,R组为56.3±17.2分钟。从围手术期第20分钟开始,D组的心率在统计学上显著低于R组。两组在平均动脉压、血氧饱和度和脑电双频指数值方面无显著差异。D组发生1例心动过缓,需要进行干预。

结论

在玻璃体切除术中,右美托咪定和瑞芬太尼输注均可用于镇静,但对于D组的心动过缓需谨慎。由经验丰富的麻醉团队预测潜在并发症对于患者和手术舒适度都至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验