What Quality Assessment Tool Should I Use? A Practical Guide for Systematic Reviews Authors.
作者信息
Delavari Somayeh, Pourahmadi Mohammadreza, Barzkar Farzaneh
机构信息
Center for Educational Research in Medical Sciences (CERMS), Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Physical Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
出版信息
Iran J Med Sci. 2023 May;48(3):229-231. doi: 10.30476/IJMS.2023.98401.3038.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
What Quality Assessment Tool Should I Use? A Practical Guide for Systematic Reviews Authors.我应该使用哪种质量评估工具？给系统评价作者的实用指南。
Iran J Med Sci. 2023 May;48(3):229-231. doi: 10.30476/IJMS.2023.98401.3038.
2
Appraisal of systematic reviews on the management of peri-implant diseases with two methodological tools.使用两种方法学工具评估关于种植体周围疾病管理的系统评价。
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45(6):754-766. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12893.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区，服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中，叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Tai Chi for improving balance and reducing falls: An overview of 14 systematic reviews.太极拳改善平衡和减少跌倒：14 项系统评价综述。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Nov;63(6):505-517. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.12.008. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
5
Crowdsourcing critical appraisal of research evidence (CrowdCARE) was found to be a valid approach to assessing clinical research quality.众包研究证据评价（CrowdCARE）被发现是评估临床研究质量的一种有效方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Dec;104:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
6
Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool.病例系列研究的方法学质量：JBI 批判性评价工具介绍。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2127-2133. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00099.
7
A practitioner's guide to developing critical appraisal skills: reviews of research.临床医师评判性思维技能培养指南：研究评价。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 May;144(5):527-30. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0155.
8
Completeness of reporting of systematic reviews in the animal health literature: A meta-research study.动物健康文献中系统评价报告的完整性：一项元研究。
Prev Vet Med. 2021 Oct;195:105472. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105472. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
9
Characteristics of the sources, evaluation, and grading of the certainty of evidence in systematic reviews in public health: A methodological study.系统评价中公共卫生证据确定性的来源、评估和分级特征：一项方法学研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 30;11:998588. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.998588. eCollection 2023.
10
Deferred cord clamping and cord milking: Certainty and quality of the evidence in meta-analyses, and systematic reviews of randomized control trials, guidelines, and implementation studies.延迟脐带夹闭和脐带挤奶：荟萃分析、随机对照试验的系统评价、指南和实施研究中的证据确定性和质量。
Semin Perinatol. 2023 Aug;47(5):151790. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2023.151790. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
引用本文的文献
1
Etomidate in Severe Cushing Syndrome: A Systematic Review.依托咪酯治疗重度库欣综合征：一项系统评价。
J Endocr Soc. 2025 Mar 19;9(4):bvaf039. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvaf039. eCollection 2025 Mar 3.
2
Intranasal insulin for the treatment of olfactory dysfunction: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.经鼻腔给予胰岛素治疗嗅觉功能障碍：系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 12;14(11):e090554. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090554.
3
Teaching and learning clinical reasoning skill in undergraduate medical students: A scoping review.本科医学生临床推理技能的教学与学习：范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 16;19(10):e0309606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309606. eCollection 2024.
4
Assessing Telehealth in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness and Challenges in Rural and Underserved Areas.评估姑息治疗中的远程医疗：对农村和服务不足地区的有效性及挑战的系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Aug 31;16(8):e68275. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68275. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Does brain entrainment using binaural auditory beats affect pain perception in acute and chronic pain?: a systematic review.使用双耳音频节拍进行脑波同步是否会影响急性和慢性疼痛中的疼痛感知？：系统评价。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024 Jan 12;24(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12906-024-04339-y.
本文引用的文献
1
Quality versus Risk-of-Bias assessment in clinical research.临床研究中的质量与偏倚风险评估。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:172-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.044.
2
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.《可信系统评价的更新指南：干预措施系统评价的新版Cochrane手册》
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10(10):ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.
3
Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect.在缺乏单一效应估计值的情况下对证据的确定性进行评级。
Evid Based Med. 2017 Jun;22(3):85-87. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110668. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
4
Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study.随机对照试验的偏倚风险与质量评估：横断面研究
BMJ. 2009 Oct 19;339:b4012. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4012.
5
2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group.2009 年考科蓝背部评价组系统评价更新方法指南。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 15;34(18):1929-41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b1c99f.
6
Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.医疗保健中的系统评价：评估对照临床试验的质量。
BMJ. 2001 Jul 7;323(7303):42-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42.
Zotero 插件