Beckman Coulter Microbiology , West Sacramento, California, USA.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine , Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Oct 24;61(10):e0115422. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01154-22. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
Accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and reporting are essential for guiding appropriate therapy for patients and direction for public health prevention and control actions. A critical feature of AST reporting is the interpretation of AST results using clinical breakpoints for reporting as susceptible, susceptible-dose dependent, intermediate, or resistant. Breakpoints are subject to continuous adjustment and updating to best reflect current clinical data. These breakpoint changes can benefit patients and public health only if adopted in a timely manner. A recent survey identified that up to 70% of College of American Pathologists (CAP)-accredited U.S. laboratories and 45% of CAP-accredited laboratories outside the U.S. use various obsolete clinical breakpoints to interpret AST results to guide patient care. The reason for the ongoing use of obsolete breakpoints is multifactorial, including barriers encountered by laboratories, commercial AST device manufacturers, standards development organizations, and regulatory bodies alike. To begin to address this important patient safety issue, CAP implemented checklist requirements for CAP-accredited laboratories to ensure up-to-date clinical breakpoint use. Furthermore, the topic was discussed at the June 2022 American Society for Microbiology Clinical Microbiology Open (CMO) with various stakeholders to identify potential solutions. This minireview summarizes the breakpoint setting process in the U.S. and highlights solutions to close the gap between breakpoint revisions and implementation in clinical and public health laboratories. Solutions discussed include clarification of data requirements and minimum inhibitory concentration only reporting for regulatory clearance of AST devices, clinical data generation to close breakpoints gaps, advocacy, education, and greater dialogue between stakeholders.
准确的抗菌药物敏感性测试(AST)和报告对于指导患者的适当治疗以及公共卫生预防和控制措施的方向至关重要。AST 报告的一个关键特征是使用报告敏感、敏感剂量依赖性、中介和耐药的临床折点来解释 AST 结果。折点会不断进行调整和更新,以最好地反映当前的临床数据。只有及时采用这些折点变化,才能使患者和公共卫生受益。最近的一项调查发现,高达 70%的美国病理学家学会(CAP)认证的美国实验室和 45%的美国以外的 CAP 认证实验室使用各种过时的临床折点来解释 AST 结果,以指导患者护理。持续使用过时折点的原因是多方面的,包括实验室、商业 AST 设备制造商、标准制定组织和监管机构遇到的障碍。为了解决这个重要的患者安全问题,CAP 为 CAP 认证的实验室实施了清单要求,以确保使用最新的临床折点。此外,该主题在 2022 年 6 月的美国微生物学会临床微生物学开放(CMO)会议上进行了讨论,与会者来自不同利益相关方,以确定潜在的解决方案。这篇简评总结了美国的折点设定过程,并强调了缩小折点修订与临床和公共卫生实验室实施之间差距的解决方案。讨论的解决方案包括澄清数据要求和仅为 AST 设备的监管批准报告最低抑菌浓度,生成临床数据以缩小折点差距,以及倡导、教育和加强利益相关方之间的对话。