Department of Rehabilitation & Extended Care, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Division of Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024 Aug 1;48(4):441-447. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000284. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
The purpose of this study was to explore self-reported Veterans Affairs (VA) amputation clinician perspectives and clinical practices regarding the measurement and treatment for amputation-related pain.
Cross-sectional survey with 73 VA rehabilitation clinicians within the VA Health Care System.
The most frequent clinical backgrounds of respondents included physical therapists (36%), prosthetists (32%), and physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist (21%). Forty-one clinicians (56%) reported using pain outcome measures with a preference for average pain intensity numeric rating scale (generic) (97%), average phantom limb pain intensity numeric rating scale (80%), or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference (12%) measures. Clinicians' most frequently recommended interventions were compression garments, desensitization, and physical therapy. Clinicians identified mindset, cognition, and motivation as factors that facilitate a patient's response to treatments. Conversely, clinicians identified poor adherence, lack of belief in interventions, and preference for traditional pain interventions (e.g., medications) as common barriers to improvement. We asked about the frequently used treatment of graded motor imagery. Although graded motor imagery was originally developed with 3 phases (limb laterality, explicit motor imagery, mirror therapy), clinicians reported primarily using explicit motor imagery and mirror therapy.
Most clinicians who use standardized pain measures prefer intensity ratings. Clinicians select pain interventions based on the patient's presentation. This work contributes to the understanding of factors influencing clinicians' treatment selection for nondrug interventions. Future work that includes qualitative components could further discern implementation barriers to amputation pain rehabilitation interventions for greater consistency in practice.
本研究旨在探讨退伍军人事务部(VA)截肢临床医生对截肢相关疼痛的测量和治疗的看法和临床实践。
对退伍军人医疗保健系统内的 73 名 VA 康复临床医生进行横断面调查。
受访者最常见的临床背景包括物理治疗师(36%)、假肢师(32%)和物理医学和康复专家(21%)。41 名临床医生(56%)报告使用疼痛结局测量方法,最偏好平均疼痛强度数字评分量表(通用)(97%)、平均幻肢疼痛强度数字评分量表(80%)或患者报告的结果测量信息系统疼痛干扰(12%)测量方法。临床医生最常推荐的干预措施是压缩服装、脱敏和物理治疗。临床医生认为心态、认知和动机是促进患者对治疗反应的因素。相反,临床医生认为,不良的依从性、对干预措施的不信任以及对传统疼痛干预措施(如药物)的偏好是改善的常见障碍。我们询问了经常使用的分级运动想象治疗方法。尽管分级运动想象最初是通过 3 个阶段(肢体侧偏性、明确的运动想象、镜像治疗)开发的,但临床医生报告主要使用明确的运动想象和镜像治疗。
大多数使用标准化疼痛测量方法的临床医生更喜欢强度评分。临床医生根据患者的表现选择疼痛干预措施。这项工作有助于了解影响临床医生选择非药物干预治疗的因素。未来包括定性成分的工作可以进一步发现截肢疼痛康复干预措施的实施障碍,以提高实践的一致性。